Effects of Modified Constraint-Induced on Chronic Stroke Patients
Comparison of the Effect of Proprioceptive Training Therapy or Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on Upper Extremity Physical Functions in Chronic Stroke Patients - A Randomized Controlled Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34752
- Acibadem University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Post stroke hemiparetic patients of six months
- spasticity ≤ Grade -3 on modified Ashworth scale
- those patients capable of extension of at least 10º each at Metacarpophalangeal (MCP), Proximal Interphalangeal (PIP) and Distal Interphalangeal (DIP) joints and 20º at wrist joint
- a score of 24 or higher on the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination
- no excessive pain in the affected upper limb, as measured by a score of 4 or higher on a 10-point visual analog scale
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with history of previous stroke,
- angina,
- uncontrolled hypertension, on medication that could impair neuromuscular performance,
- wrist or finger pathologies, significant visual or hearing impairment,
- balance problems which may compromise safety during sound upper limb constraint,
- unwilling to participate
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: conventional rehabilitation
|
Patients received conventional rehabilitation schedule
|
|
Experimental: Modified constraint-induced therapy
|
Patients received conventional rehabilitation and modified constraint-induced therapy schedule
|
|
Experimental: Proprioceptive Training
|
Patients received conventional rehabilitation and Proprioceptive Training schedule
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fugl-Meyer assessment test
Time Frame: Score change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
|
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based upper extremity function.
The maximum available score is 66 and The minimum available score is zero.The higher total score means better motor function in the arm
|
Score change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
|
|
Action Research arm test
Time Frame: Score change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
|
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is a 19 item observational measure used by physical therapists and other health care professionals to assess upper extremity performance.
The maximum available score from the 19 items was 57.
The higher total score means better motor function in the arm
|
Score change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
|
|
Motor Activity Log
Time Frame: Score change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
|
Daily use of the affected upper extremity was assessed using Motor Activity Log.
It is a self-statement questionnaire to determine the frequency and quality of movement in the upper extremity.
Score range is 0-5, The higher total score means better motor function in the arm
|
Score change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: Score change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
|
Modified Ashworth Scale was measure muscle spasticity.
It is among the most commonly used scales for clinical and research purposes.
The resistance against passive movement is evaluated on a scale of 0-4 points.The lower total score means better spasticity in the arm
|
Score change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
|
|
thumb localizing test
Time Frame: Score change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
|
A proprioception examination, called the 'thumb localizing test' (TLT), is described as a technique for testing 'limb localization'.
With the patient's eyes closed, the examiner positions one of the patient's upper limbs (fixed limb) and asks him to pinch the thumb of that limb with the opposite thumb and index finger (reaching limb).It is evaluated on a 0-3 point scale.
The lower the total score, the better the proprioceptive in the arm.
|
Score change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020-24/05
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.