Restart TICrH Alpha Pilot Protocol, Restarting DOACs After Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

May 14, 2021 updated by: Truman J Milling Jr, University of Texas at Austin

A Pilot Trial of Restarting Direct Oral Anticoagulants After Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Randomized pilot trial of restarting DOACs at 1 week versus 4 weeks after traumatic intracranial hemorrhage

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Restart TICrH two-center pilot trial will assign patients with anticoagulant-associated traumatic intracranial hemorrhage to restart anticoagulation at 1 week or 4 weeks. Entry into the trial is primarily driven pragmatically by clinician intent to restart any Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC, i.e. apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, dabigatran. There is no head to head evidence of superiority of any drug) after anticoagulant-associated traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and equipoise concerning restart of anticoagulation at the specified time intervals. DOAC will be at label dose with label adjustments for creatinine clearance. DOAC will be at continuation dose, i.e. not initial therapy high doses in the setting of VTE.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute traumatic intracranial hemorrhage on anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) or Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
  2. Patient is higher risk for stroke or other thrombotic events as witnessed by having a CHA2DS2-VASc score of > 3 (at least 3 of the following risk factors: age greater than 65, (age > 75 counts for 2 points), history of stroke or TIA (2 points), history of heart failure, history of diabetes, history of atherosclerotic vascular disease, female biological sex, history of hypertension)
  3. DOAC prescribed at label dose with creatinine clearance adjustments. DOAC at continuation dose, i.e., not initial therapy high doses in the setting of VTE

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Mechanical Valve or Ventricular Assist Device (VAD)
  2. SDH >8 mm maximum width or any midline shift at any time point or more than one SDH
  3. Physician plan to start/restart antiplatelet therapy during trial period
  4. Abbreviated Injury Scale other than head >3
  5. Pregnancy
  6. Inability to understand need for adherence to study protocol
  7. Renal function below DOAC label exclusions
  8. Any active pathological bleeding (e.g. no acute blood on most recent CT)
  9. Hypersensitivity to drug or other label contraindication
  10. Any bleeding that the investigator deems unsafe to restart DOAC at 1 week post injury, or conversely unsafe to hold DOAC to 4 weeks
  11. Completion of DOAC therapy expected prior to 60 day primary endpoint, e.g. 3-6 month VTE treatment
  12. Concomitant need for strong inducers/inhibitors of p-gp and CYP3A4
  13. Low body weight (<45kg)
  14. Inability to swallow

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 1 week restart
restart DOAC at 1 week post injury at label dose and frequency
Drug: Apixaban
Direct Oral Anticoagulation all at label dose and frequency
Other Names:
  • Dabigatran
  • Edoxaban
  • Rivaroxaban
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 4 week restart
restart DOAC at 4 weeks post injury at label dose and frequency
Drug: Apixaban
Direct Oral Anticoagulation all at label dose and frequency
Other Names:
  • Dabigatran
  • Edoxaban
  • Rivaroxaban

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
60-day composite endpoint
Time Frame: 60 days
A 60-day composite endpoint that includes the following clinical events: New or expansion of intracranial hemorrhage, other BARC3a or above major hemorrhage 28, stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and cardiovascular death
60 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disability Rating Scale (0-29 scale range)
Time Frame: 60 days
Functional Measure
60 days
Modified Rankin Scale (0-6 scale range)
Time Frame: 60 day
Functional Measure
60 day
Standard Gamble
Time Frame: pre-randomization (The day before randomization, which must occur within 6 days of index injury) and after endpoints (the day after one of the endpoints occurs. We cannot know precisely when this will occur in the 60 day follow up period)
The standard gamble is the gold standard for analysis of decision making under uncertainty 7. It is an interview technique that begins with a description of a disease state. The patient is then asked to imagine suffering the disease and having a choice between taking a medication that might cure them but also might kill them. The so-called ping-pong method requires the interviewer to start with a hypothetical scenario of 0% probability of cure and 100% probability of a painless instant death. The interviewer then asks the patient if they would take the medication. He then flips the scenario, 100% cure, 0% death. He then goes back and forth between successive scenarios of lower death higher cure and lower cure higher death. Eventually, the patient settles at an equipoise and indecision of whether the risk of dying is worth incurring to take the medication and cure the disease. This is the patient's utility for that disease, expressed as a number between 0 and 1.
pre-randomization (The day before randomization, which must occur within 6 days of index injury) and after endpoints (the day after one of the endpoints occurs. We cannot know precisely when this will occur in the 60 day follow up period)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Texas at Austin

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Kansas

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 14, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 14, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ML42205

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Sharing via BIOLINCC

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After primary publication

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings