LLLT Effects on Inferior Alveolar Nerve (IAN) Recovery Post-orthognathic Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Timothy Levine, DMD
- Phone Number: 7189186147
- Email: timothy.levine@nychhc.org
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Jennifer Acosta
- Phone Number: 7189185635
- Email: jennifer.acotsa@nychhc.org
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
- Jacobi Medical Center, Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing mandibular surgery with bilateral sagittal split osteotomies
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients must be free from pre-operative inferior alveolar neurosensory deficiencies
- intra-operative accidental fracture or rupture of the inferior alveolar nerve
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Low-level therapy intervention
Patients will receive low-level laser therapy on the skin overlying the mandible for 40 seconds per side.
All other post-operative care will be as per clinic routine.
|
The proposed LLLT protocol will use the Biolase Epic X, an InGaAsP diode laser (940nm) using the pain relief handpiece, a device which has received FDA approval (GUDID 00647529002537) for the treatment of pain, muscle relaxation and healing via increased local circulation.
The LLLT will be administered to the experimental group at 30 j/cm2.
The laser will be applied extraorally, on the skin overlying the mandible.
Application will be for 40 seconds per side, with 10 seconds administered in four places along the jawline, 1 cm apart starting from the gonial angle.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: dummy intervention
Patients will receive no dose of laser, but the handpiece will be used against their skin top mimic the LLLT.
All other post-operative care will be as per clinic routine.
|
The Biolase Epic X with pain relief handpiece will be applied with no power extraorally, on the skin overlying the mandible.
Application will be for 40 seconds per side, with 10 seconds administered in four places along the jawline, 1 cm apart starting from the gonial angle.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Soft Stimuli
Time Frame: 24 hours post-surgery
|
IAN function for soft stimuli was assessed by brushing a cotton swab along a 2cm path of the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw.
Regions right and left 1, 2 and 3 are on the skin of lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline.
Right and left regions were identified as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively.
Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the cotton swab using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response.
The number of patients who responded Yes is summarized by study arm.
|
24 hours post-surgery
|
|
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Soft Stimuli
Time Frame: 1 week post-surgery
|
IAN function for soft stimuli was assessed by brushing a cotton swab along a 2cm path of the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw.
Regions right and left 1, 2 and 3 are on the skin of lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline.
Right and left regions were identified as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively.
Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the cotton swab using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response.
The number of patients who responded Yes is summarized by study arm.
|
1 week post-surgery
|
|
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Soft Stimuli
Time Frame: 2 weeks post-surgery
|
IAN function for soft stimuli was assessed by brushing a cotton swab along a 2cm path of the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw.
Regions right and left 1, 2 and 3 are on the skin of lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline.
Right and left regions were identified as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively.
Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the cotton swab using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response.
The number of patients who responded Yes is summarized by study arm.
|
2 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Soft Stimuli
Time Frame: 3 weeks post-surgery
|
IAN function for soft stimuli was assessed by brushing a cotton swab along a 2cm path of the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw.
Regions right and left 1, 2 and 3 are on the skin of lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline.
Right and left regions were identified as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively.
Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the cotton swab using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response.
The number of patients who responded Yes is summarized by study arm.
|
3 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Soft Stimuli
Time Frame: 4 weeks post-surgery
|
IAN function for soft stimuli was assessed by brushing a cotton swab along a 2cm path of the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw.
Regions right and left 1, 2 and 3 are on the skin of lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline.
Right and left regions were identified as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively.
Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the cotton swab using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response.
The number of patients who responded Yes is summarized by study arm.
|
4 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Soft Stimuli
Time Frame: 5 weeks post-surgery
|
IAN function for soft stimuli was assessed by brushing a cotton swab along a 2cm path of the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw.
Regions right and left 1, 2 and 3 are on the skin of lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline.
Right and left regions were identified as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively.
Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the cotton swab using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response.
The number of patients who responded Yes is summarized by study arm.
|
5 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Soft Stimuli
Time Frame: 6 weeks post-surgery
|
IAN function for soft stimuli was assessed by brushing a cotton swab along a 2cm path of the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw.
Regions right and left 1, 2 and 3 are on the skin of lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline.
Right and left regions were identified as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively.
Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the cotton swab using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response.
The number of patients who responded Yes is summarized by study arm.
|
6 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Soft Stimuli
Time Frame: 8 weeks post-surgery
|
IAN function for soft stimuli was assessed by brushing a cotton swab along a 2cm path of the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw.
Regions right and left 1, 2 and 3 are on the skin of lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline.
Right and left regions were identified as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively.
Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the cotton swab using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response.
The number of patients who responded Yes is summarized by study arm.
|
8 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Soft Stimuli
Time Frame: 20 weeks post-surgery
|
IAN function for soft stimuli was assessed by brushing a cotton swab along a 2cm path of the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw.
Regions right and left 1, 2 and 3 are on the skin of lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline.
Right and left regions were identified as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively.
Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the cotton swab using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response.
The number of patients who responded Yes is summarized by study arm.
|
20 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Hard Stimuli
Time Frame: 24 hours post-surgery
|
IAN function for hard stimuli was assessed by pressing a toothpick into the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw.
Regions right and left 1, 2, and 3 are on the skin of the lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline.
Right and left regions were abbreviated as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively.
Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the toothpick using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response.
The number of patients who responded Yes (+) is summarized by study arm.
|
24 hours post-surgery
|
|
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Hard Stimuli
Time Frame: 1 week post-surgery
|
IAN function for hard stimuli was assessed by pressing a toothpick into the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw.
Regions right and left 1, 2, and 3 are on the skin of the lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline.
Right and left regions were abbreviated as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively.
Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the toothpick using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response.
The number of patients who responded Yes (+) is summarized by study arm.
|
1 week post-surgery
|
|
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Hard Stimuli
Time Frame: 2 weeks post-surgery
|
IAN function for hard stimuli was assessed by pressing a toothpick into the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw.
Regions right and left 1, 2, and 3 are on the skin of the lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline.
Right and left regions were abbreviated as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively.
Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the toothpick using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response.
The number of patients who responded Yes (+) is summarized by study arm.
|
2 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Hard Stimuli
Time Frame: 3 weeks post-surgery
|
IAN function for hard stimuli was assessed by pressing a toothpick into the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw.
Regions right and left 1, 2, and 3 are on the skin of the lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline.
Right and left regions were abbreviated as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively.
Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the toothpick using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response.
The number of patients who responded Yes (+) is summarized by study arm.
|
3 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Hard Stimuli
Time Frame: 4 weeks post-surgery
|
IAN function for hard stimuli was assessed by pressing a toothpick into the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw.
Regions right and left 1, 2, and 3 are on the skin of the lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline.
Right and left regions were abbreviated as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively.
Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the toothpick using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response.
The number of patients who responded Yes (+) is summarized by study arm.
|
4 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Hard Stimuli
Time Frame: 5 weeks post-surgery
|
IAN function for hard stimuli was assessed by pressing a toothpick into the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw.
Regions right and left 1, 2, and 3 are on the skin of the lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline.
Right and left regions were abbreviated as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively.
Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the toothpick using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response.
The number of patients who responded Yes (+) is summarized by study arm.
|
5 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Hard Stimuli
Time Frame: 6 weeks post-surgery
|
IAN function for hard stimuli was assessed by pressing a toothpick into the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw.
Regions right and left 1, 2, and 3 are on the skin of the lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline.
Right and left regions were abbreviated as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively.
Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the toothpick using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response.
The number of patients who responded Yes (+) is summarized by study arm.
|
6 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Hard Stimuli
Time Frame: 8 weeks post-surgery
|
IAN function for hard stimuli was assessed by pressing a toothpick into the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw.
Regions right and left 1, 2, and 3 are on the skin of the lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline.
Right and left regions were abbreviated as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively.
Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the toothpick using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response.
The number of patients who responded Yes (+) is summarized by study arm.
|
8 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Hard Stimuli
Time Frame: 20 weeks post-surgery
|
IAN function for hard stimuli was assessed by pressing a toothpick into the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw.
Regions right and left 1, 2, and 3 are on the skin of the lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline.
Right and left regions were abbreviated as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively.
Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the toothpick using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response.
The number of patients who responded Yes (+) is summarized by study arm.
|
20 weeks post-surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Post-operative Pain
Time Frame: 24 hours post-surgery
|
Post-operative pain was assessed and reported during each study visit using a single-item Visual Analog Scale (VAS) question.
Patients rated the intensity of pain on each side of the mandible (right and left) on an 11-point Likert scale.
Possible VAS scores ranged from 0 (complete absence of pain) to 10 (maximum amount of pain imaginable).
Results were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
|
24 hours post-surgery
|
|
Post-operative Pain
Time Frame: 1 week post-surgery
|
Post-operative pain was assessed and reported during each study visit using a single-item Visual Analog Scale (VAS) question.
Patients rated the intensity of pain on each side of the mandible (right and left) on an 11-point Likert scale.
Possible VAS scores ranged from 0 (complete absence of pain) to 10 (maximum amount of pain imaginable).
Results were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
|
1 week post-surgery
|
|
Post-operative Pain
Time Frame: 2 weeks post-surgery
|
Post-operative pain was assessed and reported during each study visit using a single-item Visual Analog Scale (VAS) question.
Patients rated the intensity of pain on each side of the mandible (right and left) on an 11-point Likert scale.
Possible VAS scores ranged from 0 (complete absence of pain) to 10 (maximum amount of pain imaginable).
Results were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
|
2 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Post-operative Pain
Time Frame: 3 weeks post-surgery
|
Post-operative pain was assessed and reported during each study visit using a single-item Visual Analog Scale (VAS) question.
Patients rated the intensity of pain on each side of the mandible (right and left) on an 11-point Likert scale.
Possible VAS scores ranged from 0 (complete absence of pain) to 10 (maximum amount of pain imaginable).
Results were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
|
3 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Post-operative Pain
Time Frame: 4 weeks post-surgery
|
Post-operative pain was assessed and reported during each study visit using a single-item Visual Analog Scale (VAS) question.
Patients rated the intensity of pain on each side of the mandible (right and left) on an 11-point Likert scale.
Possible VAS scores ranged from 0 (complete absence of pain) to 10 (maximum amount of pain imaginable).
Results were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
|
4 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Post-operative Pain
Time Frame: 5 weeks post-surgery
|
Post-operative pain was assessed and reported during each study visit using a single-item Visual Analog Scale (VAS) question.
Patients rated the intensity of pain on each side of the mandible (right and left) on an 11-point Likert scale.
Possible VAS scores ranged from 0 (complete absence of pain) to 10 (maximum amount of pain imaginable).
Results were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
|
5 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Post-operative Pain
Time Frame: 6 weeks post-surgery
|
Post-operative pain was assessed and reported during each study visit using a single-item Visual Analog Scale (VAS) question.
Patients rated the intensity of pain on each side of the mandible (right and left) on an 11-point Likert scale.
Possible VAS scores ranged from 0 (complete absence of pain) to 10 (maximum amount of pain imaginable).
Results were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
|
6 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Post-operative Pain
Time Frame: 8 weeks post-surgery
|
Post-operative pain was assessed and reported during each study visit using a single-item Visual Analog Scale (VAS) question.
Patients rated the intensity of pain on each side of the mandible (right and left) on an 11-point Likert scale.
Possible VAS scores ranged from 0 (complete absence of pain) to 10 (maximum amount of pain imaginable).
Results were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
|
8 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Post-operative Pain
Time Frame: 20 weeks post-surgery
|
Post-operative pain was assessed and reported during each study visit using a single-item Visual Analog Scale (VAS) question.
Patients rated the intensity of pain on each side of the mandible (right and left) on an 11-point Likert scale.
Possible VAS scores ranged from 0 (complete absence of pain) to 10 (maximum amount of pain imaginable).
Results were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
|
20 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Post-operative Mandibular Swelling
Time Frame: 24 hours post-surgery
|
Post-operative mandibular swelling was measured using soft measuring tape.
The extent of post-operative swelling was measured from the tip of the chin to the base of the earlobe bilaterally (right and left).
Measurements were recorded in millimeters (mm) and results summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
|
24 hours post-surgery
|
|
Post-operative Mandibular Swelling
Time Frame: 1 week post-surgery
|
Post-operative mandibular swelling was measured using soft measuring tape.
The extent of post-operative swelling was measured from the tip of the chin to the base of the earlobe bilaterally (right and left).
Measurements were recorded in millimeters (mm) and results summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
|
1 week post-surgery
|
|
Post-operative Mandibular Swelling
Time Frame: 2 weeks post-surgery
|
Post-operative mandibular swelling was measured using soft measuring tape.
The extent of post-operative swelling was measured from the tip of the chin to the base of the earlobe bilaterally (right and left).
Measurements were recorded in millimeters (mm) and results summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
|
2 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Post-operative Mandibular Swelling
Time Frame: 3 weeks post-surgery
|
Post-operative mandibular swelling was measured using soft measuring tape.
The extent of post-operative swelling was measured from the tip of the chin to the base of the earlobe bilaterally (right and left).
Measurements were recorded in millimeters (mm) and results summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
|
3 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Post-operative Mandibular Swelling
Time Frame: 4 weeks post-surgery
|
Post-operative mandibular swelling was measured using soft measuring tape.
The extent of post-operative swelling was measured from the tip of the chin to the base of the earlobe bilaterally (right and left).
Measurements were recorded in millimeters (mm) and results summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
|
4 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Post-operative Mandibular Swelling
Time Frame: 5 weeks post-surgery
|
Post-operative mandibular swelling was measured using soft measuring tape.
The extent of post-operative swelling was measured from the tip of the chin to the base of the earlobe bilaterally (right and left).
Measurements were recorded in millimeters (mm) and results summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
|
5 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Post-operative Mandibular Swelling
Time Frame: 6 weeks post-surgery
|
Post-operative mandibular swelling was measured using soft measuring tape.
The extent of post-operative swelling was measured from the tip of the chin to the base of the earlobe bilaterally (right and left).
Measurements were recorded in millimeters (mm) and results summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
|
6 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Post-operative Mandibular Swelling
Time Frame: 8 weeks post-surgery
|
Post-operative mandibular swelling was measured using soft measuring tape.
The extent of post-operative swelling was measured from the tip of the chin to the base of the earlobe bilaterally (right and left).
Measurements were recorded in millimeters (mm) and results summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
|
8 weeks post-surgery
|
|
Post-operative Mandibular Swelling
Time Frame: 20 weeks post-surgery
|
Post-operative mandibular swelling was measured using soft measuring tape.
The extent of post-operative swelling was measured from the tip of the chin to the base of the earlobe bilaterally (right and left).
Measurements were recorded in millimeters (mm) and results summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
|
20 weeks post-surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Timothy Levine, DMD, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- D'Agostino A, Trevisiol L, Gugole F, Bondi V, Nocini PF. Complications of orthognathic surgery: the inferior alveolar nerve. J Craniofac Surg. 2010 Jul;21(4):1189-95. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181e1b5ff.
- Haghighat A, Khosrawi S, Tamizifar A, Haghighat M. RETRACTED: Does Low-Level Laser Photobiomodulation Improve Neurosensory Recovery After Orthognathic Surgery? A Clinical Trial With Blink Reflex. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Mar;79(3):685-693. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.11.025. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
- Gasperini G, Rodrigues de Siqueira IC, Rezende Costa L. Does low-level laser therapy decrease swelling and pain resulting from orthognathic surgery? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul;43(7):868-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.015. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
- Khullar SM, Emami B, Westermark A, Haanaes HR. Effect of low-level laser treatment on neurosensory deficits subsequent to sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 Aug;82(2):132-8. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(96)80215-0.
- Firoozi P, Keyhan SO, Kim SG, Fallahi HR. Effectiveness of low-level laser therapy on recovery from neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Dec 17;42(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40902-020-00285-0.
- Ezzati K, Fekrazad R, Raoufi Z. The Effects of Photobiomodulation Therapy on Post-Surgical Pain. J Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Spring;10(2):79-85. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2019.13. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
- Ozen T, Orhan K, Gorur I, Ozturk A. Efficacy of low level laser therapy on neurosensory recovery after injury to the inferior alveolar nerve. Head Face Med. 2006 Feb 15;2:3. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-2-3.
- Esteves Pinto Faria P, Temprano A, Piva F, Sant'ana E, Pimenta D. Low-level laser therapy for neurosensory recovery after sagittal ramus osteotomy. Minerva Stomatol. 2020 Jun;69(3):141-147. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4970.20.04289-2. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
- Bittencourt MA, Paranhos LR, Martins-Filho PR. Low-level laser therapy for treatment of neurosensory disorders after orthognathic surgery: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017 Nov 1;22(6):780-787. doi: 10.4317/medoral.21968.
- Hamid MA. Low-level Laser Therapy on Postoperative Pain after Mandibular Third Molar Surgery. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jul-Dec;7(2):207-216. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_5_17.
- Boutault F, Diallo R, Marecaux C, Modiga O, Paoli JR, Lauwers F. [Neurosensory disorders and functional impairment after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: role of the anatomical situation of the alveolar pedicle in 76 patients]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2007 Jun;108(3):175-82; discussion 182. doi: 10.1016/j.stomax.2006.11.006. Epub 2007 Apr 19. French.
- Al-Bishri A, Barghash Z, Rosenquist J, Sunzel B. Neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: as reported in questionnaires and patients' records. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 May;34(3):247-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.06.009.
- Al-Bishri A, Rosenquist J, Sunzel B. On neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Dec;62(12):1472-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.04.021.
- Reddy GK. Photobiological basis and clinical role of low-intensity lasers in biology and medicine. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2004 Apr;22(2):141-50. doi: 10.1089/104454704774076208.
- Kuroyanagi N, Miyachi H, Ochiai S, Kamiya N, Kanazawa T, Nagao T, Shimozato K. Prediction of neurosensory alterations after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jul;42(7):814-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.11.016. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
- Baas EM, Horsthuis RB, de Lange J. Subjective alveolar nerve function after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis of mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Apr;70(4):910-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.107. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
- TRAUNER R, OBWEGESER H. The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. II. Operating methods for microgenia and distoclusion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1957 Aug;10(8):787-92; contd. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021-12990
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.