Prediction of Recovery in Patients With Neck Pain
Prediction of Recovery in Patients With Neck Pain: Prospective Longitudinal Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
KPK
-
Mansehra, KPK, Pakistan, 21300
- Recruiting
- Helping Hand Institute Of rehabilitation sciences
-
Contact:
- Keramat Ullah
- Phone Number: 0997440424
- Email: karamatjee@yahoo.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Seerat Rashid
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subacute and chronic neck pain.
- Patients with neck pain with a score of 4-10 on the numeric pain rating scale.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Acute neck pain.
- Neck pain due to fracture, tumour, infection or metabolic bone disease.
- History of cervical spine injury or surgery.
- Patients presented with disc herniation.
- Cervical instability
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: TRIPLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Follow-up on daily basis
Patient receiving treatments on daily basis (5 days a week)
|
Conventionally used intervention for subacute and chronic neck pain.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Follow-up on alternate days
Patients receiving treatment on alternate days (3 days a week)
|
Conventionally used intervention for subacute and chronic neck pain.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Numeric pain rating scale
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
|
The Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) is a self-reported, or clinician-administered, measurement tool consisting of a numerical point scale with extreme anchors of 'no pain' to 'extreme pain.
The scale is typically set up on a horizontal or vertical line, ranges most commonly from 0-10 or 0-100, and can be administered in written or verbal form.
The patient is asked to rate his/her pain intensity and a particular time frame or descriptor is established (e.g.
within the last 24 h, today, worst pain, average pain, or least pain).
The NPRS scores are high on ease of administration and simplicity for scoring.
The last reading will be taken when the NPRS score will be less than 3.
|
Up to 2 months
|
|
Neck disability index
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
|
The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a 10-item questionnaire that measures a patient's self-reported neck pain-related disability.
The NDI is the most widely used, translated and oldest questionnaire for neck pain.
Questions include activities of daily living, such as personal care, lifting, reading, work, driving, sleeping, recreational activities, pain intensity, concentration and headache.
Each question is measured on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 5, and an overall score out of 100 is calculated by adding each item score together and multiplying it by two.
A higher NDI score means the greater a patient's perceived disability due to neck pain.
The "minimally clinically important change" by patients has been found to be 5 or 10%.
The last reading will be taken when the NPRS score will be less than 3.
|
Up to 2 months
|
|
Range of Motion
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
|
Goniometric measurements are used by physical therapists to quantify baseline limitations of motion, decide on appropriate therapeutic interventions, and document the effectiveness of these interventions.
Goniometry can be considered a fundamental part of the "basic science" of physical therapy.
To most physical therapists, however, the universal goniometer (i.e.
full-circle manual goniometer) remains the most versatile and widely used instrument in clinical practice.
The last reading will be taken when the NPRS score will be less than 3.
|
Up to 2 months
|
|
Manual muscle testing for strength of cervical muscle
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
|
Medical Research Council Manual Muscle Testing scale is the most commonly accepted method of evaluating muscle strength.
This method involves testing key muscles from the upper and lower extremities against the examiner's resistance and grading the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale accordingly; 0 means no muscle activation, 1 means trace muscle activation, such as a twitch, without achieving full Range of Motion (ROM), 2 means muscle activation with gravity eliminated, achieving full ROM, 3 means muscle activation against gravity, full ROM, 4 means muscle activation against some resistance, full ROM, 5 means muscle activation against examiner's full resistance, full ROM.
The last reading will be taken when the NPRS score will be less than 3.
|
Up to 2 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Anxiety symptom scale
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
|
The Pain Anxiety symptom scale -20 (PASS-20) was constructed by extracting 20 items from its 40-item parent measure Pain Anxiety symptom scale (PASS) (18).
The PASS-20 is a 20-item self-report instrument, measuring 4 factorially distinct components of pain-related anxiety.
The cognitive subscale assesses cognitive anxiety symptoms, such as racing thoughts and impaired concentration due to pain.
The fear subscale assesses fearful thoughts and anticipated negative consequences of pain.
The escape/avoidance subscale assesses behavioural responses that reduce or terminate pain.
The physiological anxiety subscale assesses physiological arousal in response to pain.
Each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 5 (always).
Summing each subscale provides a score that can be considered a general measure of pain-related anxiety.
The last reading will be taken when the NPRS score will be less than 3.
|
Up to 2 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cai C, Ming G, Ng LY. Development of a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain who are likely to benefit from home-based mechanical cervical traction. Eur Spine J. 2011 Jun;20(6):912-22. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1673-6. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
- Sleijser-Koehorst MLS, Coppieters MW, Heymans MW, Rooker S, Verhagen AP, Scholten-Peeters GGM. Clinical course and prognostic models for the conservative management of cervical radiculopathy: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2710-2719. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5777-8. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- REC/0876 Seerat Rashid
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.