Immunosuppressant Combined With Pirfenidone in CTD-ILD

November 16, 2023 updated by: Qiang Shu, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Efficacy, Safety and Predictive Indicators of Immunosuppressant Combined With Pirfenidone in the Treatment of Connective Tissue Disease-related Interstitial Lung Disease (CTD-ILD)

A prospective cohort study was used to observe the efficacy and safety of different immunosuppressive agents with/wo pirfenidone on CTD-ILD patients in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University for 36 months.The main research endpoints are lung function, patient dyspnea score, 6-minute walking distance, imaging indicators, primary disease activity, adverse reactions, etc.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study will enroll 200 cases of connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) patients in China, including inflammatory myopathy (IIM) patients, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients, Sjogren's syndrome (SS) patients and other connective tissue disease patients.According to the patient's condition,the participants plan to be treated with different immunosuppressive agents with/wo pirfenidone .Participants can choose to continue the study up to 36 months.The efficacy and safety of the treatment in CTD-ILD patients will be evaluated with lung function, quality of life / cardiopulmonary function assessment and other disease activity indices.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250012
        • Qilu hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who meet the following inclusion criteria will be eligible to participate in the study:

    1. Aged 18-80 years;
    2. In accordance with the diagnostic criteria of connective tissue disease-related pulmonary interstitial disease (CTD-ILD);The diagnosis of CTD is in line with the international classification standard of rheumatism (including inflammatory myopathy, systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, sjogren's syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, mixed connective tissue disease, undifferentiated connective tissue disease);
    3. Subjects are willing to participate and use medication and follow-up time according to the treatment plan, and sign the informed consent;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:

    1. Subjects have non-diffuse connective tissue disease or other arthritis other than RA, such as ANCA-relateed vasculitis, psoriatic arthritis, etc;
    2. Patients who have ILD with clear etiology, such as HIV, GVHD ；

    3. Combined viscera function significantly abnormal patient:

      1. Liver: AST, ALT >1.3ULN; Bilirubin >1.5 ULN; or previous diagnosis of viral hepatitis;
      2. Kidney: Creatinine clearance <30 mL/min;
      3. Lung: Airway obstruction (pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.7); pleural effusion accounts for more than 20% of pleural effusion ;severe pulmonary infection or other clinically significant pulmonary abnormalities;
      4. Cardiovascular: Myocardial infarction or unstable angina within six months;
      5. Gastrointestinal tract: With active peptic ulcer or bleeding;
      6. Blood system: Severe anemia, decreased white blood cells and platelets
      7. Nervous system: Patients with mental disorders; cerebral thrombosis events within the past 1 year;
    4. Combined with poor prognosis of diseases, such as cancer, genetic diseases and so on;
    5. Women during pregnancy or lactation or childbearing age cannot ensure effective contraception;
    6. According to the researchers, exhibited evidence of alcohol or drug abuse;
    7. Any other major medical events beyond control;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Pirfenidone group
CTD-ILD patients treated with DMARDs and pirfenidone
Drug: Pirfenidone
CTD-ILD patients treated with pirfenidone up to the maximum tolerable dose
Drug: DMARDs
CTD-ILD patients treated with DMARDs according to the condition of the disease
Active Comparator: No-Pirfenidone group
CTD-ILD patients treated with DMARDs, without pirfenidone
Drug: DMARDs
CTD-ILD patients treated with DMARDs according to the condition of the disease

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in FVC
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in forced vital capacity(FVC) from 12 months to baseline
12 months
Change in DLCo
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCo) from 12 months to baseline
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in FVC
Time Frame: 6 months，24 months，36 months
Changes from baseline in forced vital capacity(FVC)
6 months，24 months，36 months
Changes in DLCo
Time Frame: 6 months，24 months，36 months
Changes from baseline in carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCo)
6 months，24 months，36 months
Changes from baseline in Dyspnea score
Time Frame: 6 months，12 months, 24 months，36 months
Changes from baseline in Dyspnea score. Dyspnea score:activity tolerance of patients with dyspnea in daily life: 0: normal, 1: dyspnea when climbing the fifth floor, 2: dyspnea when climbing the third floor, 3: dyspnea when climbing the second floor, 4: Difficulty in breathing when walking on the flat ground 100-500m, 5: Difficulty in breathing when walking on flat ground for 50-100m, 6: Difficulty in breathing when walking on flat ground for 15-50m, 7: Difficulty in breathing when walking on flat ground 5-15m, 8: Difficulty in breathing during daily dressing, 9: Difficulty in breathing when eating, 10: Difficulty in breathing when resting.The higher the score, the more severe the disease.
6 months，12 months, 24 months，36 months
Imaging changes
Time Frame: 6 months，12 months, 24 months，36 months
Changes from baseline in high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT)
6 months，12 months, 24 months，36 months
Changes from baseline in 6 minutes walking distance
Time Frame: 6 months，12 months, 24 months，36 months
Changes from baseline in 6 minutes walking distance
6 months，12 months, 24 months，36 months
Changes from baseline in C-reactive protein(CRP)
Time Frame: 6 months，12 months, 24 months，36 months
Changes from baseline in C-reactive protein(CRP)
6 months，12 months, 24 months，36 months
Changes from baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate(ESR)
Time Frame: 6 months，12 months, 24 months，36 months
Changes from baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate(ESR)
6 months，12 months, 24 months，36 months
Changes from baseline in VAS score
Time Frame: 6 months，12 months, 24 months，36 months
The visual analogue scale (VAS) is used for pain assessment. The basic method is to use a moving ruler with a length of about 10cm. One side is marked with 10 scales. The two ends are respectively "0" and "10" points. A point of 0 means no pain, and a point of 10 means the most unbearable. Severe pain. It can reflect the degree of activity of the primary disease.
6 months，12 months, 24 months，36 months
Number of participants with "adverse events (AEs)"
Time Frame: Up to month 36
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product.
Up to month 36

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Yang Xiaoyun, Dr., Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 9, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 16, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CTD-ILD QiluH

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings