Novel Dose Adjustment Schedule for Late Injection in SCIT in AR
Comparative Study of Novel and Conventional Dose Adjustment Schedules for Late Injection of More Than 16 Weeks in Subcutaneous Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
- Beijing Tongren Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- (1) aged 18 to 60 years;
- (2) only had a positive response to Der p and Der f but no other inhalant allergens based on EUROline Allergy Diagnostics (Beijing Oumeng Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Meanwhile at least Der p -specific IgE (sIgE) in serum of was ≥ 0.7 kU/l (CAP Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) using ImmunoCAP system (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) regardless of the result of Der p -specific IgE in serum;
- (3) had reached cluster SCIT maintenance period and the overall treatment time was more than 1 year but less than 2 years;
- (4) hope to continue to complete the entire treatment and have good compliance.
Exclusion Criteria:
- (1) diagnosed as asthma based on the guidelines of the Global Initiative for Asthma(13);
- (2) had Grade II or above systemic adverse reactions occurred in the past SCIT period.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Novel dose adjustment schedule
The patients in this group had late injections of more than 16 weeks in maintenance period, and restarted SCIT with novel dose adjustment schedule.
|
novel dose adjustment schedule means directly reaching dose of Vial 4, 10,000 SQ
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional dose adjustment
The patients in this group had late injections of more than 16 weeks in maintenance period, and restarted SCIT with conventional dose adjustment schedule.
|
conventional dose adjustment schedule means restarting from dose of Vial 1, 10 SQ
|
|
Active Comparator: Continuous cluster SCIT schedule
The subjects had a routine cluster SCIT schedule without interrupted period.
|
Patient receiving continuous cluster SCIT for DM during the same period
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The change of Combined Symptom and Medication Score
Time Frame: baseline, week 3, week 6, week 26.
|
CSMS which was calculated as follows: (total nasal symptom scores (TNSS))/4+ MS as recommended by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Position Paper.
The CSMS score was 0-6, 0 for good therapeutic effect and 6 for poor therapeutic effect.
|
baseline, week 3, week 6, week 26.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The change of total nasal symptom scores
Time Frame: baseline, week 3, week 6, week 26.
|
last 7 days' overall symptom scores of major nasal symptoms (nasal obstruction, nasal itching, sneezing, and rhinorrhea: 0, no symptoms; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, serious).
TNSS scores was 0 to 12 (0 = no symptoms;12 = most severe symptoms).
|
baseline, week 3, week 6, week 26.
|
|
The change of medication score
Time Frame: Baseline, week 26.
|
MS was calculated as follows: 1, oral Clarityne tablet; 2, intranasal Budesonide nasal spray.
|
Baseline, week 26.
|
|
Adverse reactions
Time Frame: week 26.
|
The patients were instructed to immediately report to the physician if any symptom appeared or adverse reactions occurred during the observation period.
The time and severity of onset, estimation of a possible reason, resolution, and outcome should be recorded.
The adverse reactions were classified in terms of the localization (local or systemic) and the time of appearance (immediate or delayed).
Local reactions (LRs) were expressed as the length of the wheal diameter.
Systemic reactions (SRs) were graded in accordance with the standards of the EAACI
|
week 26.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Luo Zhang, Beijing Tongren Hospital, China
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- TR-SIT-16w
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.