A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effects and Mechanism of Action of Dysport®, Botox® and Xeomin® in the Extensor Digitorum Brevis Model in Healthy Adult Male Participants
A Phase I, Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Single-centre Comparative Study to Evaluate the Pharmacodynamic Profile of Dysport®, Botox®, and Xeomin® in the Extensor Digitorum Brevis (EDB) Model in Healthy Adult Male Participants
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Manchester, United Kingdom
- Mac Research Clinical research Unit
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participant must be between18 to 65 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent
- Participants who are overtly healthy as determined by medical evaluation including medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, vital signs and cardiac monitoring
- A body mass index (BMI) within the range 18 and 30 kg/m2 (inclusive).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any medical condition that may put the participant at risk with exposure to BoNT, including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or any other disease that might interfere with neuromuscular function
- Previous treatment with botulinum toxin (BoNT) (any serotype) during the past 6 months
- Known hypersensitivity to any of the components of the Dysport/ Botox/ Xeomin formulation (which includes human serum albumin, lactose, sucrose) or allergy to cow's milk protein
- Use of agents that could interfere with neuromuscular transmission, including calcium channel blockers, penicillamine, aminoglycosides, lincosamides, polymixins, magnesium sulphate, anticholinesterases, succinylcholine and quinidine
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Dysport®
40 Units (U) Intramuscular (IM) injection at day 1.
|
Intramuscular Injection, concentration 300 units (U)
Other Names:
Intramuscular Injection, concentration 50 U
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Botox®
16U IM at day 1.
|
Intramuscular Injection, concentration 300 units (U)
Other Names:
Intramuscular Injection, concentration 50 U
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Xeomin®
16U IM at day 1.
|
Intramuscular Injection, concentration 300 units (U)
Other Names:
Intramuscular Injection, concentration 50 U
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Adjusted Mean (AM) Percentage (%) of CMAP Total Amplitude at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28
|
The CMAP procedure was performed on the injected foot by a neurophysiologist.
Percentage relative to baseline was calculated as (value at Week 28 [mean of the 3 measurements]/baseline value) multiplied by (*) 100.
The adjusted mean was obtained from a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model with Fisher scoring.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to study drug administration.
Baseline value used for this analysis was the average of 6 measurements, the 3 measurements at screening and the 3 measurements at baseline.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in AM % of CMAP Total Amplitude at Week 40
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 40
|
The CMAP procedure was performed on the injected foot by a neurophysiologist.
It was measured as percentage relative to baseline defined as CMAP at the corresponding visit (mean of the 3 measurements)/CMAP at baseline (mean of the 6 measurements)*100.
The adjusted mean was obtained from a MMRM model with Fisher scoring.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to study drug administration.
Baseline value used for this analysis was the average of 6 measurements, the 3 measurements at screening and the 3 measurements at baseline.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 40
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Recovery of CMAP Total Amplitude
Time Frame: At Weeks 28 and 40
|
The recovery was considered to be reached for all the visits occurring after the time to recovery, that is (i.e.) the first visit for which CMAP total amplitude returned to at least 85% of the baseline value.
Percentage of participants with recovery of CMAP total amplitude was analyzed at Weeks 28 and 40.
|
At Weeks 28 and 40
|
|
Time to Onset of Action of Study Intervention
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 40
|
Time to onset of action was defined as the first timepoint when EDB CMAP total amplitude was less or equal to 85% of the baseline value.
|
From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 40
|
|
Duration of Response
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 40
|
Duration of response was calculated as time to recovery of CMAP total amplitude - time to onset.
Time to recovery was defined as the first timepoint where EDB CMAP total amplitude returned to at least 85% of the baseline value.
|
From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 40
|
|
Percentage of Maximal Inhibition (Maximal Effect) of CMAP Total Amplitude
Time Frame: Up to Week 40
|
Maximal inhibition was defined as the maximal measured inhibition of CMAP total amplitude of stimulated EDB.
|
Up to Week 40
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Maximal Effect of CMAP Total Amplitude
Time Frame: At Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 20
|
Time to maximal effect was defined on an individual basis as the time between baseline and the timepoint of maximal inhibition of CMAP amplitude of stimulated EDB.
Participants with maximal effect of CMAP total amplitude were reported.
|
At Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 20
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Ipsen Medical Director, Ipsen
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Cholinergic Agents
- Neuromuscular Agents
- Acetylcholine Release Inhibitors
- Botulinum Toxins, Type A
- abobotulinumtoxinA
- Botulinum Toxins
- incobotulinumtoxinA
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- D-FR-52120-279
- 2021-000802-14 (EudraCT Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.