Cannabidiol on Reward- and Stress-related Neurocognitive Processes in Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder

September 14, 2023 updated by: Joji Suzuki, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Cannabidiol on reward-and Stress-related Neurocognitive Processes in Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder: A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Cross-over Trial

The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of cannabidiol on reward- and stress-related neurocognitive processes among individuals with opioid use disorder on buprenorphine or methadone treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) demonstrate reward- and stress-related neurocognitive changes compared to individuals without OUD, including cravings for opioids in response to exposure to triggers, tendency to make impulsive and disadvantageous decisions, and a strong attentional bias towards drug-related cues. Together, these deficits are significant contributors to relapse and discontinuation of treatment. Cannabidiol (CBD) has been shown to impact some of these cognitive deficits but studies of CBD among individuals with OUD are mostly lacking. Therefore, this study aims to answer whether CBD has any impact on reward-related neurocognitive deficits in individuals with OUD. If successful, this line of research will lay the groundwork for future studies to evaluate CBD's impact on OUD treatment outcomes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
15

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    • Vermont
      • Rutland, Vermont, United States, 05701
        • Rutland Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • English speaking
  • DSM5 diagnosis of opioid use disorder
  • Receiving buprenorphine or methadone for treatment of opioid use disorder
  • Agreeable to abstaining from using any cannabis or CBD products for the duration of the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any self-reported use of cannabis or CBD products in the past 30 days
  • Baseline depression (PHQ9) or anxiety (GAD7) scores of greater than 10
  • Currently pregnant
  • Hepatic liver enzymes greater than 3x upper normal limit
  • Hypersensitivity to cannabinoids or sesame oil (CBD solution comes in sesame oil emulsion)
  • Currently taking any medications with known significant pharmacokinetic interactions with CBD

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Cannabidiol 600mg
All subjects will receive 600mg of oral cannabidiol in a double-blind fashion. Cannabidiol will be provided using Epidiolex™ oral solution 100mg/mL. Following administration, a battery of tests will be conducted to examine reward- and stress-related neurocognitive processes.
Drug: Cannabidiol 100 MG/ML [Epidiolex]
600mg
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
All subjects will receive a matching placebo in a double-blind fashion. Following administration, a battery of tests will be conducted to examine the impact on reward- and stress-related neurocognitive processes.
Drug: Placebo
Matching placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Cue-reactivity
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3 (at least 1 week apart)
The primary outcomes is cue-induced cravings (Opioid Craving Scale). This was measured with a single 10-point likert scale asking about cravings, where 0 represented lower levels of craving and 10 indicated higher levels of cravings. This was given at 3 different time points, pre-cue, post-neutral, and post-drug images. Cue-induced craving is the difference between drug cue and pre-cue scores.
Visit 2 and 3 (at least 1 week apart)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delayed Discount
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3 (at least 1 week apart)
Monetary Choice Questionnaire will be used to calculate impulse decision making. This is a 27-item self-administered questionnaire where participants choose between a smaller, immediate monetary reward and a larger, delayed monetary reward. A participants score is between one of the two endpoints (0.25 or 0.00016). If an individual is more likely to prefer the delayed versus immediate reward, their score is more likely to be closer to the 0.00016 endpoint. Please note the rate of delayed discounting is not the same for each question.
Visit 2 and 3 (at least 1 week apart)
Decision Making
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3 (at least 1 week apart)
Iowa Gambling Task will be used to assess impulsive decision-making. The larger the number, the more "safer" options were chosen. This is measured by taking the total number of "risky" choices and subtracting it from the "less risky" choices. The lower the number, the more "high risky" options were chosen. If participants chose the less risky option, they received a positive point, if individuals picked the riskier choice, they received a negative point. Negative values indicate a participant chose more riskier decisions than less-risky, whereas positive values indicate participants chose the less riskier decision more often. The lowest score an individual could receive is -100 (very risk) to 100 (least risky).
Visit 2 and 3 (at least 1 week apart)
Attentional Bias
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3 (at least 1 week apart)
Visual probe task will be used to assess attentional bias to drug-related cues. Opioid-related and neutral images will be used. Each trial will begin with a fixation point lasting 500ms. A pair of images then will appear on the left and right of the screen for either a short (200ms) or long (500ms) stimulus duration to assess automatic orientating and controlled attention processing, respectively. Image pairs will be replaced by a probe in the location of either the opioid-related or neutral image. The probe will remain until the participant responds to identify the probe orientation by pressing the response keys as quickly as possible. Attentional bias is calculated as the difference in reaction time (RT) between when the probe replaced the neutral compared with the opioid-related images (i.e. RTneutral - RTopioid). Therefore the more positive the number, the less attentional bias toward drug cue, and a negative number represents more attentional bias toward the drug cue.
Visit 2 and 3 (at least 1 week apart)
Stress-reactivity
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3 (at least 1 week apart)
Physiologic and subjective stress will be assessed. Stress-reactivity was measured by participants mirror tracing an image on a compute screen where a loud beeping noise would occur if a participant took too long or went outside the lines. It's measured in ms and the longer someone stayed on the task, the better ability they have to react stress.
Visit 2 and 3 (at least 1 week apart)
Stress-Reactivity (Physiological)
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3 (at least 1 week apart)
For this outcome, participants received a salivary cortisol test prior to, immediately after, and 20 minutes after the cue-reactivity paradigm. Lower levels indicate lower levels of salivary cortisol in the sample.
Visit 2 and 3 (at least 1 week apart)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 2, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 2, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 14, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2021P001829

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings