Shifting Perspectives R33 Phase: Enhancing Outcomes in Anorexia Nervosa With CRT

June 30, 2025 updated by: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Shifting Perspectives R33 Phase: Enhancing Outcomes in Adolescent Anorexia Nervosa With Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT)

Anorexia Nervosa is a serious life-threatening illness with a typical age of onset in adolescence; if not effectively treated, it has the potential to significantly impact adolescent development and quality of life. Research on executive functioning in anorexia nervosa indicates that it may be a viable target for intervention that could improve outcome. The current project focuses on determining whether or not the investigators can improve set-shifting in affected adolescents in the hopes that improvements in set-shifting will, ultimately, improve outcome.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is the second phase (R33) of a two-phased project exploring the effect of adding Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT) to traditional Family Based Treatment (FBT) for adolescents with Anorexia Nervosa (AN) and their families. This phase (R33) follows a prior 2-year study (R61) which examined the impact of CRT on set-shifting abilities (a type of executive functioning often referred to as cognitive flexibility). This second phase aims to replicate findings from the first study as well as examine whether the addition of CRT to traditional FBT will impact treatment outcomes (e.g., eating disorder symptoms, weight outcomes). CRT is an adjunctive treatment approach where adolescents learn different ways of thinking and problem solving to become more flexible thinkers. The investigators will recruit and randomly assign 96 families of youth with AN to either an FBT group or FBT with adolescent-focused CRT group. Parents and adolescents will complete questionnaires and assessments to evaluate outcomes and predictors of outcome. Evidence supporting FBT+CRT to increase set-shifting in adolescents will inform future efforts to leverage understanding of neurobiology of AN in adolescents to improve outcome. Results will also inform how best to augment current treatments, support parents, and increase positive outcomes for adolescents with AN, and reduce relapse.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
283

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Catherine Alix Timko, PhD
  • Phone Number: 267-426-5467
  • Email: timkoc@chop.edu

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19146
        • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Adolescents

  1. Age 12-18
  2. Currently meets Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 criteria for Anorexia Nervosa
  3. Medically stable for outpatient treatment
  4. Fluent in English
  5. No co-morbid condition that would exclude participation
  6. Medical clearance from primary care physician and permission to speak to Primary Care Physician about clinical issues
  7. Biological parent or primary caregiver willing to engage in treatment and who lives with the adolescent

Inclusion Criteria: Parents

  1. Age >18
  2. Child with a diagnoses of AN
  3. Parent or caregiver willing to participate
  4. Fluent in English
  5. No co-morbid condition that would exclude participation

Exclusion Criteria: Adolescents

  1. Adolescent outside age range
  2. No more than four sessions of prior CRT in any format
  3. Pregnant adolescent
  4. Presence of: pervasive developmental disability, psychosis, bipolar disorder, substance abuse, autism spectrum disorder, or intellectual disability
  5. Presence of: a brain disorder or injury (such as TBI) that could impact the ability to engage in treatment
  6. Use of anti-psychotic medication during first 15 FBT sessions. Use of this medication is permitted in the optional 12 FBT sessions in the 6-month follow-up period of this study. This medication can affect cognitive abilities, which may interact with assessments that measure cognitive flexibility. However, we do not measure cognitive flexibility in the 6-month follow-up period when the 12 additional FBT sessions can take place.
  7. Concurrent psychosocial therapy

Exclusion Criteria: Parents

  1. Presence of: pervasive developmental disability, psychosis, uncontrolled bipolar disorder, substance abuse, autism spectrum disorder, or intellectual disability.
  2. Presence of: a brain disorder or injury (such as TBI) that could impact the ability to engage in treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Family Based Treatment (FBT)
Families will receive 15 sessions of FBT alone.
Behavioral: Family Based Treatment
Family Based Treatment (FBT) is an evidence based treatment in which parents are responsible for adolescent re-nourishment. They play an active role in treatment and their self-efficacy to make decisions regarding their child's treatment is empowered.
Other Names:
  • FBT
Experimental: FBT w/ Adolescent-focused Cognitive Remediation Therapy
Family Based Treatment with Adolescent-focused Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT): Families will receive 15 sessions of FBT over six months. The first 9 sessions of FBT will be preceded by adolescent-focused CRT.
Behavioral: Family Based Treatment
Family Based Treatment (FBT) is an evidence based treatment in which parents are responsible for adolescent re-nourishment. They play an active role in treatment and their self-efficacy to make decisions regarding their child's treatment is empowered.
Other Names:
  • FBT
Behavioral: Cognitive Remediation Therapy
Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT) is an adjunctive treatment focused on increasing set-shifting ability and developing meta-cognition. CRT is a behavioral treatment that presents tasks to participants in a standardized order within each session. Each task has a number of levels. Participants stay at the same task-based level until mastered. They then move up a level on that task. participants can be at different levels on different tasks within each session. After completion of tasks, participants are asked to reflect on their thought processes in solving the tasks. Standard prompts are used to guide the discussion.
Other Names:
  • CRT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in executive functioning
Time Frame: Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Investigators will use the Delis Kaplan Executive Functioning System (D-KEFS ) Trails Number-Letter Sequencing subtest, a neurocognitive behavioral task, to assess ability to set-shift (a core component of executive functioning). Investigators will compare change in scaled scores from pre, during, and post-treatment across groups. Scaled scores range from 0-19 with higher scores indicating better executive functioning.
Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Change in response inhibition
Time Frame: Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Investigators will use the Delis Kaplan Executive Functioning System Inhibition subtest, neurocognitive behavioral task, to assess ability to inhibit automatic responses. Investigators will compare change in scaled scores from pre, during, and post-treatment across groups. Scaled scores range from 0-19 with higher scores indicating better response inhibition.
Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Change in set-shifting
Time Frame: Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Also using the Delis Kaplan Executive Functioning System Inhibition task, investigators will use scores from the D-KEFS Inhibition/Switching subtest to assess ability to switch between alternating rules (a component of set shifting). Investigators will compare change in scaled scores from pre, during, and post-treatment across groups. Scaled scores range from 0-19 with higher scores indicating better set-shifting.
Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Change in shifting accuracy
Time Frame: Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Investigators will use the Delis Kaplan Executive Functioning System Verbal Fluency subtest, neurocognitive behavioral task, to assess accuracy in shifting categories (a component of executive functioning). Investigators will compare change in scaled scores from pre, during, and post-treatment across groups. Scaled scores range from 0-19 with higher scores indicating better shifting accuracy.
Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Change in category switching flexibility
Time Frame: Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Investigators will also use the Delis Kaplan Executive Functioning System Verbal Fluency subtest, category switching scores, to assess flexible switching (a component of executive functioning). Investigators will compare change in scaled scores from pre, during, and post-treatment across groups. Scaled scores range from 0-19 with higher scores indicating better switching flexibility.
Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Change in flexibility
Time Frame: Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Investigators will use the Delis Kaplan Executive Functioning System Sorting subtest, neurocognitive behavioral task, to assess changes in flexibility.Investigators will compare change in scaled scores from pre, during, and post-treatment across groups. Scaled scores range from 0-19 with higher scores indicating better flexibility.
Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Change in self-reported inhibition control
Time Frame: Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning is a self and parent-report measure of executive functioning. The measure comprises 10 clinical scales, of which investigators will use the Inhibition subscale to assess self-reported inhibition control (ranged from 0-100, with higher reporting greater set-shifting ability). Investigators will compare change in T scores from pre, during, and post-treatment across groups.
Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Change in self-reported set-shifting
Time Frame: Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning is a self and parent-report measure of executive functioning. The measure comprises 10 clinical scales, of which investigators will use the Shifting subscale to assess self-reported set-shifting. Investigators will compare change in T scores (ranged from 0-100, with higher reporting greater set-shifting ability) from pre, during, and post-treatment across groups.
Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Rate of weight gain
Time Frame: Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Investigators will weigh participants during treatment to compare rate of change (slope) in weight gain from pre, during, and post-treatment across groups. Larger change in weight indicates greater recovery from the eating disorder.
Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Change in eating disorder symptomology
Time Frame: Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Adolescents will complete the Eating Disorder Examination - Questionnaire (a 28-item self-report measure of eating disorders symptomatology), while parents will complete the Anorectic Behavior Observation Scale (a 30-item collateral report measure of eating and exercise behavior). Investigators will examine changes in these scores from baseline, during, and post-treatment. Scores range from 0-6 with higher scores suggesting more severe eating disorder symptomatology.
Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Change in behavioral flexibility (amount consumed)
Time Frame: Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Adolescents will complete a buffet meal during which investigators will record the amount of food they consume in grams. This task aims to assess changes in behavioral flexibility by objectively assessing food choice in individuals with an eating disorder. Investigators will examine changes from baseline, during, and at treatment completion. A larger amount of food eaten (in grams) represents greater behavioral flexibility.
Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Change in behavioral flexibility (eating disorder behaviors)
Time Frame: Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment
Adolescents will complete a buffet meal during which investigators will record eating behaviors using a novel checklist (a total score of eating disorder behaviors observed). These behaviors include staring, fidgeting, inappropriate napkin use, frequency of food tearing, frequency of dissecting food. Minimum score for this variable is 0, however, there is no maximum frequency. This task aims to assess changes in behavioral flexibility by objectively assessing eating-related behaviors in individuals with an eating disorder, with higher scores suggesting lower behavioral flexibility. Investigators will examine changes from baseline, during, and at treatment completion.
Baseline, during treatment, end of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Catherine Alix Timko, PhD, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 5, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 21, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 21, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 30, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 21-019079
  • 5R61MH119262-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • R33MH119262 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings