Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation Versus TheraTogs on Treatment of Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy.
Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation Versus TheraTogs on Gait and Balance in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Mecca, Saudi Arabia, 715
- Maternity and Children hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Their weight should be less than 40 kg.
- The spasticity degrees of the affected lower limb will range between grades (1, 1+ & 2) according to Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS).
- Those children functioning scores at Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) Levels I and II.
- They can walk 10 min conditionally without an orthosis.
- Ought to be intellectually skilled and ready to comprehend and take after directions.
- They will have neither serious nor recurring medical complications.
- Children's height will be more than 100 cm to fit with the Biodex balance equipment that will be used in this study to evaluate balance performance.
- No serious hip & knee flexion tightness will be present. Knee flexion at starting contact should be between 20-40º .
- Peroneal nerve and the proximal leg muscles ought to be in place.
- They ought to have no significant issues influencing balance other than spasticity.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children who demonstrate skin diseases or allergic reactions to adhesive tape or any other materials used in this study.
- Children with visual, auditory or perceptual deficits.
- Children with surgical interference for the lower limb.
- Children with seizures or epilepsy.
- Children who received botulinum toxin in the lower extremity musculature during the past 6 months or who wish to receive it within the period of study, other spasticity medication within 3 months of pre-treatment testing .
- Children with pacemakers or other diseases that are contraindicated by electrical stimulation.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: FACTORIAL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Functional Electrical Stimulation Group
Functional Electrical Stimulation Group received 1.5 hours of conventional physical therapy program /session - 3 sessions weekly - three successive months + 1/2 hour of the gait training program with functional electrical stimulation /session - 3 sessions weekly - three successive months.
|
Functional Electrical Stimulation Group received 1.5 hours of conventional physical therapy program /session - 3 sessions weekly - three successive months + 1/2 hour of the gait training program with functional electrical stimulation /session - 3 sessions weekly - three successive months.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: TheraTogs Group
TheraTogs Arm The participating children will wear TheraTogs orthotic undergarment and strapping as preparatory stage without application of any exercise program with gradually increasing the worn time till reaching the 8 hours per day.
|
TheraTogs Arm The participating children worn TheraTogs orthotic undergarment and strapping as preparatory stage without application of any exercise program with gradually increasing the worn time till reaching the 8 hours per day.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline spatial and temporal gait parameters at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
|
Gait parameters were evaluated for every child at baseline and 3 months post-intervention using the Pro-Reflex motion analysis system (Qualisys; Qualisys Inc, Goeteborg, Sweden).
For the purpose of this study four commonly used and reliable gait parameters were examined: stride length, step length, velocity, cadence, and stance and swing phase percentage.
|
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
|
|
Change from baseline postural stability at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
|
Postural stability were evaluated at baseline and 3 months post-intervention using the Biodex Balance System (BBS) (Balance System SD, Shirely, NY, USA).
|
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Umm Al-Qura
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.