Psycho-traumatic Consequences of the COVID-19 Health Crisis Among Professionals in Emergency Services (COVER PRO LT)

January 26, 2022 updated by: Elisa Letellier, Hospices Civils de Lyon

Psycho-traumatic Consequences of the COVID-19 Health Crisis Among Professionals in Emergency Services and SAMU: Multicenter Cohort Study (COVid in EmeRgency PROfessionnals Long Term)

The COVID-19 outbreak has been categorized as a pandemic and declared an international public health emergency by WHO. In this context, an exceptional mobilization and a complete reorganization of the organization of the healthcare offer was put in place.The investigators will study the psychological consequences among emergency department (ED) / SAMU (Service d'Aide Médicale Urgente) professionals exposed during the COVID-19 pandemic to high psychological stress due to work overload, changes in practices and fears of contamination.They will evaluate at 9 and 12 months after the end of the second lockdown (July December 2020), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), personal and professional stress, anxiety and depression, burn-out and consumption of anxiolytic products. This is a multi-center study and includes doctors, DE interns and nurses, other paramedics and medical regulatory assistants working in one of the ED or SAMU working during phase 3 of the COVID-19 pandemic. It should make it possible to know the psychological load of the months following the epidemic among health professionals who worked in emergencies during this period and to understand their risk of occurrence of PTSD. These elements are also essential to improve the management of health crises and to put in place preventive measures for health professionals, in particular in anticipation of recurrences, second wave or future new episode.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
71

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Pierre-Bénite, France, 69310
        • Service d'Accueil des Urgences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults
  • Administrative and technical medical staff of the Hospices Civils de Lyon
  • Contractual or holder
  • Having participated in the COVER PRO study
  • Working in one of the HCL phase 3 departments of the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Affiliated with a social security system
  • Having signed an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate
  • Major under legal protection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Follow-up
Other: PTSD evaluation of emergency room staff 9 and 12 months after the end of second lockdown in France during COvid-19 pandemic
PCL-5 autoquestionnaire to make the PTSD diagnosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Existence of a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) at 12 months using PTSD Scale
Time Frame: 12 months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
: Existence of a PTSD after the end of the second lockdown using the PCL-5 scale (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist, 20 items, self-questionnaire) validated in French for PTSD screening. The presence of a "probable PTSD" will be defined by a cut-off score of 31/80 and at least a positive response to one of the four questions asking if the symptoms were causing difficulties in relations with family, friends, work or in daily life
12 months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Existence of a Post Ttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) 9 months using PTSD Scale
Time Frame: 9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Existence of a PTSD after the end of the second lockdown using the PCL-5 scale (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist, 20 items, self-questionnaire) validated in French for PTSD screening. The presence of a "probable PTSD" will be defined by a cut-off score of 31/80 and at least a positive response to one of the four questions asking if the symptoms were causing difficulties in relations with family, friends, work or in daily life
9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Anxiety evaluation at 12 months using HAD scale
Time Frame: 12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Existence of anxious symptomatology assessed by the HAD scale. 14 items, cut-off score: 8 suspected disorder, 11: proven disorder
12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Anxiety evaluation at 9 months using HAD scale
Time Frame: 9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Existence of anxious symptomatology assessed by the HAD scale. 14 items, cut-off score: 8 suspected disorder, 11: proven disorder
9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Depression evaluation at 12 months using HAD scale
Time Frame: 12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Existence of depression symptomatology assessed by the HAD scale. 14 items, cut-off score: 8 suspected disorder, 11: proven disorder
12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Depression evaluation at 9 months using HAD scale
Time Frame: 9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Existence of depression symptomatology assessed by the HAD scale. 14 items, cut-off score: 8 suspected disorder, 11: proven disorder
9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Presence of a Burn out at 12 months using the Maslach Burnot Inventory (MBI) scale
Time Frame: 12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Burnout characterized by the Maslach burnout inventory scale. All MBI items are scored using a 7 level frequency ratings from "never" to "daily." The MBI has three component scales: emotional exhaustion (9 items), depersonalization (5 items) and personal achievement (8 items). Each scale measures its own unique dimension of burnout.
12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Presence of a Burn out at 9 months using the MBI scale
Time Frame: 9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Burnout characterized by the Maslach burnout inventory scale. All MBI items are scored using a 7 level frequency ratings from "never" to "daily." The MBI has three component scales: emotional exhaustion (9 items), depersonalization (5 items) and personal achievement (8 items). Each scale measures its own unique dimension of burnout.
9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Work-related stress measured using Karasek questionnaire at 12 months
Time Frame: 12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Work-related stress measured using Karasek questionnaire at 12 months
12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Work-related stress measured using Karasek questionnaire at 9 months
Time Frame: 9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Work-related stress measured using Karasek questionnaire at 9 months
9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Consumption of psychoactive substances at 12 months
Time Frame: 12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Change in the consumption of psychoactive substances at 12 months
12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Percentage of patients with psychological Support at 12 months
Time Frame: 12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Percentage of patients who benefit from a psychological support at 12 months
12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Mean number of days of sick leave at 12 months
Time Frame: 12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Mean number of days of sick leave at 12 months
12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospices Civils de Lyon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 12, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 16, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 16, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 26, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 69HCL21_0311

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings