Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Evaluation and Recognition by CMR (PREFER-CMR)

December 13, 2021 updated by: University of East Anglia

PReserved Ejection Fraction Evaluation and Recognition by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common and growing condition with a poor prognosis but the pathophysiology and management are still being investigated. The PREFER-CMR project aims to evaluate and validate the application of novel 4D cardiac magnetic resonance flow dynamic methods to measure left ventricular pressures and validate these measurements with direct pressure measurement by coronary angiography. This is a prospective observational study of patients with HFpEF undergoing clinical evaluation with coronary angiography who will also undergo contemporaneous cardiac MRI. The primary outcome will be the level of agreement between the two methods using angiography as the reference method.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is prevalent, increasing in incidence and has a poor prognosis. Accurate left ventricular (LV) haemodynamic assessment is needed to diagnose and manage patients with HFpEF. The reference method for assessment is an invasive study using catheters to measure intra-ventricular pressure but this is rarely done due to its invasive nature, high procedural costs and lack of expertise, despite the fact that haemodynamic guided therapy is associated with reduced re-hospitalisation and mortality. Non-invasive methods of LV haemodynamic assessment are inaccurate. The Investigators have developed an accurate four-dimensional flow cardiac magnetic resonance (4D flow CMR) protocol which is non-invasive and addresses the issues with existing practices to evaluate HFpEF. This observational-analytical study aims to assess the utility of a non-invasive 4D flow CMR protocol for haemodynamic assessment of HFpEF, to generate clinical data to support future clinical trials, clinical translation and patient benefit. This research study will involve generating a precise haemodynamic model using invasive and non-invasive data of prospectively recruited patients. This model will be also optimised in clinical patients with arrhythmias. Also, observational data will be collected to test the model's prognostic value.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

  • Suspected heart failure patients
  • Suspected coronary artery disease patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults: age≥18 years.
  2. Typical HF symptoms (NYHA stage>I) within the last six months.
  3. Raised NTproBNP (>400 pg/ml)
  4. EF>50 % with the absence of structural heart disease on TTE (except left ventricular hypertrophy or left atrial enlargement).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients unable/unwilling to provide informed consent.
  2. Bodyweight>120 kg or inability to lie flat/still.
  3. Contraindication for invasive workup (allergy to contrast, severe renal insufficiency with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGRF)<30 ml/min).
  4. Contraindications for a contrast-enhanced CMR study (allergy to contrast, incompatible devices or implants, severe claustrophobia).
  5. Previous medical history of EF <50%
  6. Pregnancy

The extended observational arm of the study will have wider eligibility criteria

- Patients undergoing cardiac MRI for clinical indications irrespective of EF

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
HFpEF group
Suspected HFpEF group: 80 patients will be recruited with history of dyspnoea, LV ejection fraction ≥ 50%, raised NTproBNP
Diagnostic test: Multi Parametric Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
Research based Cardiac MRI evaluation to determine cardiovascular haemodynamics
Control group
20 patients with suspected CAD but with no dyspnoea and normal echocardiogram.
Diagnostic test: Multi Parametric Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
Research based Cardiac MRI evaluation to determine cardiovascular haemodynamics

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Left ventricular pressure measured by invasive angiography (reference method) and modelled by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
Time Frame: 30 days
Agreement of invasively measured left ventricular pressure in millimeters of mercury (mmHg) by invasive angiography to non-invasively modelled left ventricular pressure by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The agreement will be tested by Bland-Altman plots..
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prognostic relevance of left ventricular pressures measured by cardiac MRI
Time Frame: Ten years
Is cardiovascular magnetic resonance modelled left ventricular pressure in millimeters of mercury (mmHg) associated with MACE events including re-hospitalization, stroke, myocardial infarction and death. Association between pressure measurements and MACE will be tested by Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
Ten years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of East Anglia

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Clinical Research and Trials Unit (Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, UK)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Pankaj Garg, MD, University of East Anglia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2032

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 28, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 13, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRAS 301141

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The dataset of this study are available at the discretion of the Principal Investigator on reasonable request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings