Shock Wave Therapy in Individuals With Lateral Epicondylitis
Analgesic Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Individuals With Lateral Epicondylitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Amman, Jordan, 11622
- Isra University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- An inclusion criterion was a confirmed diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis with lateral elbow pain lasting more than 6 months and less than 1 year.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants were excluded from this study if they had cervical radiculopathy, elbow deformity, history of diabetes mellitus, hypo- or hyperthyroidism, history of malignancy, chronic inflammatory diseases, and pregnancy. Patients who received corticosteroid injections to the lateral epicondyle within 6 weeks were also excluded.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy
The participants in the experiment group received 5 consecutive sessions of ESWT for 5 minutes.
Treatment parameters for the shock wave therapy group were set similar to a previous study (Devrimsel et al., 2013) 2000 shock waves with 1.6 bar intensity and 16 Hz frequency were applied for five sessions using the Swiss DolorClast Master (EMS, Nyon, Switzerland).
All participants used 10-cm lateral epicondyle bandages in the treatment period, while none of them received analgesic or anti-inflammatory drugs and received exercise programs.
|
The participants in the experiment group received 5 consecutive sessions of ESWT for 5 minutes.
Treatment parameters for the shock wave therapy group were set similar to a previous study (Devrimsel et al., 2013) 2000 shock waves with 1.6 bar intensity and 16 Hz frequency were applied for five sessions using the Swiss DolorClast Master (EMS, Nyon, Switzerland).
All participants used 10-cm lateral epicondyle bandages in the treatment period, while none of them received analgesic or anti-inflammatory drugs and received exercise programs.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional physiotherapy
The participants in the control group received 5 sessions of conventional physical therapy intervention for 5 minutes.
The control group intervention consists of a 1-minute friction massage over the common extensor tendon of the elbow, followed by 3 minutes therapeutic ultrasound with a frequency of 1.5 Hz, and a 1-minute ice massage over the common extensor tendon of the elbow.
All participants used 10-cm lateral epicondyle bandages in the treatment period, while none of them received analgesic or anti-inflammatory drugs and received exercise programs.
|
The participants in the control group received 5 sessions of conventional physical therapy intervention for 5 minutes.
The control group intervention consists of a 1-minute friction massage over the common extensor tendon of the elbow, followed by 3 minutes therapeutic ultrasound with a frequency of 1.5 Hz, and a 1-minute ice massage over the common extensor tendon of the elbow.
All participants used 10-cm lateral epicondyle bandages in the treatment period, while none of them received analgesic or anti-inflammatory drugs and received exercise programs.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at 5 day
|
Participants were asked to rate their present pain intensity, as caused by the lateral epicondylitis, from zero to 10 using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
|
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at 5 day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Upper extremity disability and symptoms
Time Frame: Change from baseline Upper extremity disability and symptoms at 5 day
|
Upper extremity disability and symptoms were evaluated using the Taiwan version Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire (Khoury, 2009).
This 30-item questionnaire asks about the participants' ability to perform 21 various tasks, includes nine questions associated with symptoms on a 5-point scale, with the score of one representing no difficulty or no symptom and the score of five representing the inability to finish the task or severe pain.
|
Change from baseline Upper extremity disability and symptoms at 5 day
|
|
Maximal grip strength
Time Frame: Change from baseline maximal grip strength at 5 day
|
The maximal grip strength of the involved arm was evaluated using a grip strength dynamometer (Exacta Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer, North Coast Medical Inc, Gilroy, CA).
Participants were asked to grip the dynamometer as hard as possible three times at 10-second rest intervals in the sitting position, with 90 degrees of elbow flexion, the shoulder in adduction, the wrist in slight extension, and the forearm in neutral position.
The highest grip strength number was recorded.
|
Change from baseline maximal grip strength at 5 day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Salameh Aldaja, PhD, Isra University, Jordan
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 17/173
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.