Virtual Reality for Improving Symptoms in Palliative Care (VRPC)

May 3, 2024 updated by: Patricia Valcke, Western University, Canada
The objective of this study is to determine whether VR can ameliorate symptoms for palliative care patients within a hospice setting. We also aim to verify the efficacy with a larger sample size than previously shown, as well as extend the population to include non-cancer patients receiving Hospice care. We will further attempt to delineate whether there is a sustainability of symptomatic improvement one week after VR experiences.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Potential candidates will be provided with our assent and consent information form and the study will be explained to them in detail prior to gaining consent. As per standard practice at The Hospice of Windsor & Essex County, palliative care ESAS symptoms will be measured at baseline during the week prior to the VR experience. The mean of these pre-VR scores will be calculated as a baseline, optimally 3 separate ESAS scores in the preceding week. ESAS symptoms and expectations/satisfaction will then be measured immediately before and after the VR experience. An average set of ESAS scores will then be calculated in the same manner for one week post VR as per baseline pre-VR scores above.

We expect to find a decrease in Palliative Care symptoms after the intervention of a VR experience.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
15

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • at least 18 years or older
  • admitted to Hospice for Specialty Palliative Care

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) ≤ 20%
  • severe cognitive impairment leading to inability to provide ESAS scores for 5 key symptoms measured in this study
  • severe visual and/or hearing impairment preventing use of VR (glasses and hearing aids may be worn during VR sessions and do not exclude participation)
  • absolute inability to sit
  • paralysis of an upper limb
  • participant dies before VR experience

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: VR experience
Participants will be given a list of VR applications to choose from. They will then be given instructions by a research assistant (approximately 10 minutes) on how to use the selected application they have chosen, as well as time for any questions they may have before starting their VR experience. They will then have an approximately 30-minute session of that VR experience. They may or may not be accompanied by a family member or significant other and will also have a research assistant available to aid them in any difficulties experienced during the VR experience.
Device: Virtual Reality
The intervention is a Virtual Reality experience within a selected application using an Oculus Quest 2 ©, as previously in the relevant intervention arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VR experience effect on pain, shortness of breath, depression, anxiety, and well-being scores (0 - 10)
Time Frame: ESAS scores measured immediately before VR experience will be compared to ESAS scores measured immediately after VR experience
The primary outcome of this study will be a significant difference in change of ESAS score for 5 key symptoms (pain, shortness of breath, depression, anxiety, and well-being) immediately before and after a VR experience.
ESAS scores measured immediately before VR experience will be compared to ESAS scores measured immediately after VR experience

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VR experience longitudinal effect (one week later) on baseline pain, shortness of breath, depression, anxiety, and well-being scores (0 - 10)
Time Frame: Baseline average ESAS scores measured one week prior to the VR experience will be compared to the average of ESAS scores one week following the VR experience.
The first secondary outcome of this study will be a significant difference between the mean of the 1-week pre-VR and the mean of the 1-week post-VR ESAS scores for 5 key symptoms (pain, shortness of breath, depression, anxiety, and well-being). For more objective evaluation of pain and distress we will also be measuring vitals immediately before and immediately after each VR experience.
Baseline average ESAS scores measured one week prior to the VR experience will be compared to the average of ESAS scores one week following the VR experience.
VR experience effect on Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) (part of vital signs) as indicator for Pain and/or Distress
Time Frame: MAP measured immediately before and immediately after each VR experience.
For more objective evaluation of pain and distress, the investigators will be measuring blood pressure to compare the Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP; mmHg) immediately before and immediately after each VR experience.
MAP measured immediately before and immediately after each VR experience.
VR experience effect on Heart Rate (HR) (part of vital signs) as indicator for Pain and/or Distress
Time Frame: HR measured immediately before and immediately after each VR experience.
For more objective evaluation of pain and distress, the investigators will be measuring Heart Rate (HR; beats per minute [bpm]) immediately before and immediately after each VR experience.
HR measured immediately before and immediately after each VR experience.
VR experience effect on Respiratory Rate (RR) (part of vital signs) as indicator for Pain and/or Distress
Time Frame: RR measured immediately before and immediately after each VR experience.
For more objective evaluation of pain and distress, the investigators will be measuring Respiratory Rate (RR; breaths per minute [brpm]) immediately before and immediately after each VR experience.
RR measured immediately before and immediately after each VR experience.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Western University, Canada

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 20, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 3, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Windsor Essex Hospice VR

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Currently, there is no plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings