Addressing Stress Amongst Female Entrepreneurs in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a Pilot Study (DWMTS)
Stress and Emotion Management Training for Female Entrepreneurs in Ethiopia
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- PSI and World Bank, Ethiopia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18;
- Women entrepreneurs who obtained loan or business skills training from WEDP;
- Those who have plan to live in Addis Ababa in the next six months;
- Those who can read and speak Amharic and can understand the study questionnaire;
- Those who have capacity to provide informed consent;
- Score 8 or above on the Ethiopian adaptation of Kessler-6;
Exclusion Criteria:
- Kessler 6 score >20;
- Those who have recent or current suicidal thoughts or plans;
- Those who have limitation to understand the study questionnaire;
- Those who have not capacity to provide informed consent;
- Do not own a mobile phone;
- Not interested in receiving the intervention
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Stress and emotion management
A locally adapted self-help guidebook originally developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), 'Doing what matters in times of stress' for managing disruptive emotions and psychological distress, will be delivered to female entrepreneurs at their residence, followed by 5-6 phone calls from a trained mental health helper to reinforce the materials over a 6-week period.
The intervention is intended to help people manage their psychological distress associated with a range of adversities but is not intended for participants with severe mental health problems such as psychosis or imminent risk of suicide.
|
The handbook materials and lay helper scripts are based on principles of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and aims to enhance psychological flexibility.
Psychological flexibility reflects how a person adapts to fluctuating situational demands, reconfigures mental resources, shifts perspective, and balances competing needs.
ACT teaches alternative methods to accommodate difficult thoughts and feelings, primarily through mindfulness techniques.
At the same time, ACT also focuses on guiding participants to live in ways consistent with their personal values.
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Control group
No intervention.
May receive intervention post study if findings are indicative of any benefit.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mental Distress using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-6)
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks post intervention
|
Minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 24.
Higher scores indicate high levels of psychological distress (worse outcome)
|
4-6 weeks post intervention
|
|
Mental Distress using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-6)
Time Frame: 6-9 months post intervention
|
Minimum value of 0 and a maximum score of 24.
Higher scores indicate high levels of psychological distress (worse outcome)
|
6-9 months post intervention
|
|
Depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks post intervention
|
Minimum score 0 and a maximum score of 27.
Higher scores indicate increased levels of depressive symptoms (worse outcome).
|
4-6 weeks post intervention
|
|
Depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 6-9 months post intervention
|
Minimum score 0 and a maximum score of 27.
Higher scores indicate increased levels of depressive symptoms (worse outcome).
|
6-9 months post intervention
|
|
Stress using the Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks post intervention
|
Minimum score of 0 and a maximum of 40.
Higher scores indicate high levels of perceived stress (worse outcome).
Investigators will reverse code items 4,5, 7 and 8
|
4-6 weeks post intervention
|
|
Stress using the Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: 6-9 months post intervention
|
Minimum score of 0 and a maximum of 40.
Higher scores indicate high levels of perceived stress (worse outcome).
Investigators will reverse code items 4,5, 7 and 8
|
6-9 months post intervention
|
|
Self-reported Business outcomes
Time Frame: 6-9 months post intervention
|
Self-reported past month profits in local currency
|
6-9 months post intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-reported Business outcomes
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks post intervention
|
Self-reported past month profits in local currency
|
4-6 weeks post intervention
|
|
Self-reported Business Closure
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks post intervention
|
Self-reported business closure
|
4-6 weeks post intervention
|
|
Self-reported Business Closure
Time Frame: 6-9 months post intervention
|
Self-reported business closure
|
6-9 months post intervention
|
|
Self-reported number of recent hires
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks post intervention
|
Average self-reported number of employees hired in the past month
|
4-6 weeks post intervention
|
|
Self-reported number of employees
Time Frame: 6-9 months post intervention
|
Average self-reported number of employees
|
6-9 months post intervention
|
|
Self-Esteem using the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks post intervention
|
Minimum score 10 and a maximum score of 40.
Investigators will reverse code items 3,5,8,9 and 10 .
Higher scores indicate high levels of self-esteem (better outcome)
|
4-6 weeks post intervention
|
|
Self-Esteem using the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale
Time Frame: 6-9 months post intervention
|
Minimum score 10 and a maximum score of 40.
Investigators will reverse code items 3,5,8,9 and 10.
Higher scores indicate high levels of self-esteem (better outcome)
|
6-9 months post intervention
|
|
World Health Organisation- Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5)
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks post intervention
|
Minimum score of 0 and a maximum of 25.
Higher scores mean better wellbeing (better outcome).
Scores are transformed to 0-100 (by multiplying by 4.
|
4-6 weeks post intervention
|
|
World Health Organisation- Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5)
Time Frame: 6-9 months post intervention
|
Minimum score of 0 and a maximum of 25.
Higher scores mean better wellbeing (better outcome).
Scores are transformed to 0-100 (by multiplying by 4.
|
6-9 months post intervention
|
|
Functional Impairment using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-2.0 -12 item version)
Time Frame: 6-9 months post intervention
|
Minimum score of 12 and a maximum of 60.
Higher scores indicate high levels of disability (worse outcome)
|
6-9 months post intervention
|
|
Functional Impairment using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-2.0 -12 item version)
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks post intervention
|
Minimum score of 12 and a maximum of 60.
Higher scores indicate high levels of disability (worse outcome)
|
4-6 weeks post intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Naira Kalra, PhD, World Bank
- Principal Investigator: Adiam Hailemicheal, MSc, World Bank
- Principal Investigator: Kassahun Habtamu Mekonnen, PhD, Addis Ababa University
- Principal Investigator: Medhin Selamu Tegegn, PhD, College of health science, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- DWMTS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Publicly available. Use of the dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include:
- the Identification of the Primary Investigator
- the title of the survey (including country, acronym and year of implementation)
- the survey reference number
- the source and date of download
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.