Photographic Evidence of Oral Precancerous Lesions in Current Tobacco and Areca Nut Users Improves Their Quit Rates

January 28, 2022 updated by: Dr. Shalini Gupta, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

Visual Communication Through Personal Intraoral Photographs of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders in Current Tobacco and Areca Nut Users Improves Habit Abstinence: a Pilot Interventional Study

The success of tobacco and areca nut cessation programs in individuals with Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders (OPMDs) is imperative for risk reduction and prevention of oral cancer. A prospective pilot interventional study where 200 participants with current tobacco and areca nut habits and OPMD were randomly divided in two groups. Group A ( n=100; Habit cessation counselling with general and medical management for OPMD). Group B ( n=100; Habit cessation counselling with general and medical management for OPMD and visual exposure to personal intraoral photographs of oral lesions at baseline and review).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A prospective pilot interventional study was carried out in a Oral Medicine unit at a tertiary referral center where OPMD and Oral cancer screening is carried out routinely in all patients examined in the Out Patient Department (OPD). Ethical clearance for conducting the study and taking serial intraoral photographs of OPMD in consenting participants was obtained from the Institute Ethics Committee.All patients in OPD were initially screened for current habits of any form of tobacco and areca nut products through history and referred to the Tobacco Cessation Clinic (TCC) for individual counselling session.This counselling was based on the toolkit issued by the World Health Organization (WHO) for delivering brief tobacco intervention under WHO capacity building training package.The patients then underwent detailed intraoral examination for any oral mucosal changes. Those patients that were diagnosed as having any OPMD as per clinical diagnostic criteria were then recruited as participants in the study. A total of 200 participants with current tobacco and areca nut habits and OPMDs were recruited after informed written consent and randomly assigned to the two groups. The Control Group A had 100 participants who received standard management protocol for OPMD. The experimental Group B received all the management as in Control Group A but were also shown their intraoral photographs of oral lesions and explained about the areas of abnormalities that were of concern. All the participants were reviewed at 1, 3 and 6 months for surveillance of OPMD lesions and habit status.The data was analysed for statistically significant differences between the two groups p<0.05.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • India
    • Delhi
      • New Delhi, Delhi, India, 100029
        • Oral Medicine and Radiology, CDER, AIIMS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Current tobacco and areca nut users.
  • Presence of oral potentially malignant disorders

Exclusion Criteria:

• Any oral lesion suspicious of malignancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Habit cessation counselling with management for OPMD
n=100; Habit cessation counselling with general and medical management for OPMD
Behavioral: Tobacco and areca nut cessation counselling with standard management for Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
WHO toolkit for Tobacco cessation (5A's and 5R's model)
Experimental: Habit cessation counselling, management for OPMD and intraoral photographs
n=100; Habit cessation counselling with standard management for OPMD and visual exposure to personal intraoral photographs of oral lesions at baseline and review
Behavioral: Tobacco and areca nut cessation counselling with standard management for Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
WHO toolkit for Tobacco cessation (5A's and 5R's model)
Other: visual exposure to personal intraoral photographs of oral lesions at baseline and review
Chairside digital intraoral photographs of oral potentially malignant disorder with smart phone and showing the photograph to the participant explaining the abnormal areas of concern

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Habit quit rates
Time Frame: 6 months
Discontinuation of habit more than 1 month.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Size of oral lesions
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in size of lesions from baseline in millimeters
6 months
Oral burning sensation
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in oral burning sensation from baseline Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale 0-10; 0: No oral burning sensation; 10: Worst oral burning sensation
6 months
Colour of oral lesions
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in colour of oral lesions from red to white
6 months
Inter incisal mouth opening
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in interincisal mouth opening from baseline in millimeters
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Shalini Gupta, MDS,FDSRCS, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 31, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 28, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IEC-616

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

The study data can be made available on request via email to principal investigator

IPD Sharing Time Frame

after publication in journal for a period of 12 months

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

email of principal investigator shalinigupta@hotmail.com

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings