Simunye: A Couples-focused Intervention for HIV Prevention and Care in South Africa

June 4, 2026 updated by: Lynae Darbes, University of Michigan

A Couples-focused Intervention for HIV Prevention and Care in South Africa

From a sample of 272 male-female couples (544 individuals, 272 men and 272 women) recruited from rural KaZulu-Natal, South Africa, couples will be randomized to receive either individual a package of dyadic counseling and testing (intervention arm) or an attention matched control. The research examines the impact of a package of dyadic counseling and testing on viral suppression and engagement in HIV care among sero-discordant and concordant positive male-female couples in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

South Africa remains one of the countries mostly heavily impacted by the HIV epidemic, with an overall estimated adult HIV prevalence of 18% to 30% among female antenatal clinic attendees. There is now substantial evidence that more than 80% of new infections occur within primary male-female partnerships. The high rates of new infections among primary partnerships are attributed to a combination of low levels of HIV testing and a high prevalence of outside sex partners. Recent work by Darbes (MPI), in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) - the site of the proposed new research - found that among a sample of 330 heterosexual couples, 49% of men and 41% of women had no previous HIV testing history. In 20% of couples, neither partner had ever tested for HIV, despite living in a region with one of the highest adult HIV prevalence globally. Beyond the low levels of HIV testing, recent work also demonstrates significant deficits across the continuum of care in South Africa: recent work by Haber in KZN shows that only 45% of HIV-positive individuals are linked to care, 35% initiate ART, and 33% reach viral suppression. There is increasing evidence of efficacy for couples' focused HIV prevention interventions. Couples HIV Testing and Counseling (CHTC) is a proven strategy to reduce the risk of HIV transmission between partners. However, CHTC focuses only on the first stage of the cascade of HIV care - testing - are there are no interventions that allow couples to pass through the cascade of care together. Using a randomized controlled trial design with 272 couples, we aim to address this gap in HIV prevention and care literature by comparing a package of dyadic focused HIV testing and counseling interventions, against an attention matched control. The proposed RCT will test the efficacy of the dyadic intervention for achieving gains in viral suppression and engagement in HIV care. Heterosexual couples represent a significant yet over- looked risk group in South Africa, and innovative solutions are urgently needed to improve progression across the continuum of HIV care.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
544

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • South Africa
    • KwaZulu-Natal
      • Sweetwaters, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, 3201
        • Human Sciences Research Council

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 46 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. both aged between 18-50
  2. report being a cis-gender male and a cis-gender female
  3. report being in a relationship with each other for at least 6 months
  4. are not in a polygamous marriage and 5) report being sexually active with their partner.

Serostatus Inclusion Criteria:

For those individuals who already know that they are HIV-positive, the inclusion criteria will be that they report one of the following conditions:

  1. have never initiated ART
  2. not currently on ART (but can have been on it before)
  3. if already on ART, that they have missed 3 doses of medication in the past 30 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Couples in which one or both members report experiencing or perpetrating severe IPV in the prior 6 months
  2. Below age 18 or above age 50
  3. Report being transgender
  4. Report not being a relationship at all or for <6 months
  5. Are in a polyamorous marriage
  6. Are not sexual active with participating partner

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention
For couples who are prevalent sero-discordant, this will be a CHTC session. For couples who are prevalent concordant HIV-positive, the first visit will be the first Partner Steps session. For couples in which one or both do not know their sero-status or have not tested for HIV in the past 12 months, the first session will be a CHTC session.
Behavioral: A couples-focused intervention for HIV prevention and care in South Africa
From a sample of 272 male-female couples (544 individuals, 272 men and 272 women) recruited from rural KaZulu-Natal, South Africa, couples will be randomized to receive either individual a package of dyadic counseling and testing (intervention arm) or an attention matched control.
Active Comparator: Attention Matched Control
Participants in the control group will receive an intervention, with the same number of sessions as couples of the same sero-status in the intervention condition, delivered via one-on-one couples counseling sessions (i.e., one couple with one counselor).
Behavioral: A couples-focused intervention for HIV prevention and care in South Africa
From a sample of 272 male-female couples (544 individuals, 272 men and 272 women) recruited from rural KaZulu-Natal, South Africa, couples will be randomized to receive either individual a package of dyadic counseling and testing (intervention arm) or an attention matched control.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Virologic suppression change
Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 months for 24 months
A blood draw will be conducted to provide a measure of viral load at each visit to look for changes between visits. The outcome will be a binary outcome of detectable versus undetectable viral load.
Baseline and every 6 months for 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavioral indicators of engagement in HIV care
Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 months for 24 months
Engagement in care is conceptualized as including linkage to care and retention in HIV care. For HIV-positive partners who report no engagement in HIV care at baseline, linkage to care is defined as attending at least one clinical care appointment, having at least one CD4 test performed, and having at least one viral load test performed within 6 months of the baseline visit
Baseline and every 6 months for 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Michigan

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
University of California, San Francisco
Human Sciences Research Council

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lynae Darbes, Ph.D., University of Michigan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 29, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 4, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HUM00203672
  • R01MH123392 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings