Feasibility and Acceptability of Powdered Multinutrient Formula

April 1, 2025 updated by: Jeanette Johnstone, Oregon Health and Science University

Feasibility and Acceptability Study of a Powdered Multinutrient Formula in Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Emotional Dysregulation

The study aims to test the feasibility and acceptability of 1) consumption of EMPowerplus Lightning Sticks, 2) at-home collection of blood and urine samples, and 3) remote visits and completion of online behavioral questionnaires.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study aims to test the feasibility and acceptability of 1) consumption of EMPowerplus Lightning Sticks, 2) at-home collection of blood and urine samples, and 3) remote visits and completion of online behavioral questionnaires. A limited number of blood samples will be used to generate cytokine data to test the ability to detect these molecules from the Tasso device-collected plasma. Parent and child questionnaire responses will examined for signals of change, but no formal statistical comparisons will be performed. This study will inform us whether a larger efficacy study is possible in this population.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health & Science University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age inclusive of and between 7 and 16 years at the time of enrollment
  2. Verbally willing to ingest one EmpowerPlus Lightning Stick daily
  3. Attend all virtual study appointments and complete questionnaires
  4. Have been previously enrolled in a multinutrient study OR complete a screening to match with participants from that study in terms of age and symptoms of ADHD and emotional dysregulation
  5. Be medication and supplementation free (if supplement ingredient is contained in the Lightning Stick) prior to study initiation
  6. Willing to collect blood and urine samples, once, at home.

Exclusion Criteria*:

  1. Neurological disorder involving brain or other central function (e.g., history of, or suspected, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, narcolepsy) or other major psychiatric condition requiring hospitalization (e.g. significant mood disorder, active suicidal ideation, or psychosis), based on parent/guardian self-report of child's condition
  2. Any serious medical condition, including inflammatory bowel disease, history of cancer, kidney or liver disease, hyperthyroidism, diabetes Type I or II
  3. Known allergy to any ingredients of the intervention
  4. Any known abnormality of mineral metabolism (e.g., Wilson's disease, hemochromatosis)
  5. Taking any medication with primarily central nervous system activity, including stimulants used to treat symptoms of ADHD
  6. Any disability that would interfere with participant answering questions verbally
  7. Non-English speaking
  8. Pregnancy or sexually active at baseline. *Exclusion criteria will be based on parent/guardian report on child. If the parent/guardian reports medical exclusion criteria, or concerns about eligibility, data provided by parent/guardian will be confirmed by review of medical records with release of information signed by parent/guardian. Potential participants may be reviewed virtually by study physician in the case of any concerns about participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Lightning Stick
Feasibility and acceptability
Dietary supplement: EmpowerPlus Lightning Sticks
multinutrient supplement containing vitamins, minerals, amino acids and antioxidants taken one Stick daily by dissolving the powder on or under the tongue

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility measured by count of remaining Sticks
Time Frame: week 6

Feasibility will be determined if consumption of one Lightning Stick daily is achieved when greater than or equal to 80% of provided Sticks were taken.

Measured by count of remaining (unused) Sticks.
week 6
Abbreviated Acceptability Rating Profile - 7 questions on a 6-point Likert scale
Time Frame: week 6
Acceptability of taking the Lightning Sticks will be measure through 7 questions with a 6-point Likert-scale, (range: Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree) Acceptability will be achieved if greater than or equal to 70% of children and parents report that taking powdered multinutrients is acceptable, at or above the Agree range.
week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility measured by count of participants who provide blood using the Tasso device
Time Frame: once, at baseline
At-home collection of blood with the Tasso device will be considered feasible if greater than or equal to 70% of children provide the sample.
once, at baseline
Acceptability measured by a 'yes' response to their preference of using the Tasso device instead of a lab-based blood draw
Time Frame: once, at baseline
Acceptability will be measured if greater than or equal to 70% of children and parents state they preferred the Tasso at-home collection method instead of going to a lab to provide the blood sample.
once, at baseline
Feasibility measured by count of participants who provide the dried urine sample
Time Frame: once, at baseline
At-home collection of dried urine samples will be considered feasible if greater than or equal to 70% of children provide the sample.
once, at baseline
Acceptability measured by a 'yes' response to their preference of using the at-home dried urine sample collection method instead of a lab-based urine sample collection method
Time Frame: once, at baseline
Acceptability will be measured if greater than or equal to 70% of children and parents state they preferred the at-home dried urine collection method instead of going to a lab to provide the urine sample.
once, at baseline
Feasibility of remote study visits measured by count of participants who complete all online remote study visits
Time Frame: week 6
Feasibility will be determined if greater than or equal to 70% of parents/guardians complete all three remote visits
week 6
Acceptability measured by a 'yes' response to their preference of completing online remote study visits instead of in-person study visits
Time Frame: week 6
Acceptability will be measured if greater than or equal to 70% of parents state they preferred completing online remote study visits instead of in-person study visits
week 6
Monitor participants for side effects by count of 'yes' if listed symptoms are new or have increased in severity, using the question format from the Pediatric Adverse Events Rating Scale
Time Frame: week 6
Parent and child report of side effects, including: headache, dry mouth, sleep disruptions, nausea, irritability, fatigue, anxiety, changes in appetite, skin rash, migraines, and other (specify what symptom).
week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Oregon Health and Science University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jeanette Johnstone, PhD, Oregon Health and Science University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 2, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 1, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 23379 (Other Identifier: City of Hope Medical Center)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings