Haplo-PBSC+Cord vs Haplo-PBSC+BM for Hematological Malignancies Undergoing Allo-HSCT

August 12, 2024 updated by: Liu Qifa, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

A Comparative Study of Haploidentical Transplantation Supported by Third-party Cord Blood and Haploidentical Transplantation in Hematological Malignancies

The objective of this study was to explore whether the combination with umbilical cord blood (UCB) is associated with superior disease-free survival (DFS) in the setting of haploidentical donors (HID) transplantation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The main causes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) failure are primary disease relapse and transplant-related complications, especially relapse. In recent years, with the development of transplantation technology, alternative donors such as HID and UCB have been widely used. But, these alternative donors are associated with high incidences of transplant-related complications and mortalities when compared with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donors. Some studies suggeted that mixed grafts might overcome the disadvantages of a single alternative graft. UCB transplant (UCBT) supported by third-party HID or HID transplants supported by third-party UCB has been reported to have rapid engraftment and low incidences of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), making survival improvement. However, most of these results came from single-arm studies. The comparative studies between haplo-PBSC+Cord and haplo-PBSC+BM are scarce in the setting of HID transplantation. In a retrospective study, the investigators found haplo-PBSC+Cord transplantation has superior DFS than haplo-PBSC+BM in hematological malignancies. To further confirmed this conclusion, the investigators plan to conduct a prospective, multicenter, phase 3 randomized controlled trial.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
314

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515
        • Department of Hematology,Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing first HID allo-HSCT
  • Age 18 to 65 years old with ECOG performance status 0-2
  • Received myeloablative conditioning regimens
  • Sign informed consent form, have the ability to comply with study and follow-up procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Received PBSCs as only grafts
  • Acute leukemia transformed from a myeloproliferative tumor
  • Cardiac dysfunction (particularly congestive heart failure, unstable coronary artery disease and serious cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring antiarrhythmic therapy)
  • Respiratory failure ( PaO2 ≤60mmHg)
  • Hepatic abnormalities (total bilirubin ≥3 mg/dL, aminotransferase >2 times the upper limit of normal)
  • Renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance rate < 30 mL/min)
  • ECOG performance status 3, 4 or 5
  • With any conditions not suitable for the trial (investigators' decision)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Haplo-PBSC+Cord group
The third party UCB will be infused the day after infusion of PBSCs from HID.
Other: PBSCs
PBSCs harvest is performed from day 5 of G-CSF to obtain at least 7.0×10^8 total nucleated cells/kg recipient ideal body weight.
Other: Cord
The criteria for cord selection included the following: (1) ≥3 of 6 HLA loci , (2) blood type matches, (3) contained a minimum cell count of 0.3×10^8 nucleated cells/kg and 0.15×10^6 CD34-positive cells/kg before freezing. The third party UCB will be infused the day after infusion of PBSCs.
Active Comparator: Haplo-PBSC+BM group
The BMSCs from the same HID will be infused the day after infusion of PBSCs.
Other: PBSCs
PBSCs harvest is performed from day 5 of G-CSF to obtain at least 7.0×10^8 total nucleated cells/kg recipient ideal body weight.
Other: BMSCs
BMSCs of donor will be collected and infused at least 0.5×10^8 total nucleated cells/kg recipient ideal body weight the day after PBSCs infusion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Disease-free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Relapse rate
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
The cumulative incidence of hematopoietic engraftment.
Time Frame: 30 days post-transplantation
Hematopoietic engraftment includes the time of neutrophil and platelet engraftment. Neutrophil engraftment was defined as the first of two consecutive days with an absolute neutrophil count in the peripheral blood exceeding 0.5 × 10^9/L and the platelet engraftment was defined as the first of 3 days with an absolute platelet count exceeding 20 × 10^9 /L without transfusion support.
30 days post-transplantation
The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD)
Time Frame: 100 days post-transplantation
Acutue GVHD was defined according to the 1994 consensus conference on acute GVHD grading and graded from I to IV.
100 days post-transplantation
The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD
Time Frame: 1 year
Chronic GVHD was graded as mild, moderate and severe according to the national institutes of health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic GVHD: the 2014 diagnosis and staging working group report.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Hunan Provincial People's Hospital
First People's Hospital of Chenzhou
Dongguan People's Hospital
The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
The First People's Hospital of Guangzhou

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Qifa Liu, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 2, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 12, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NFEC-2021-126

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings