AESCULAP® Plasmafit® Cementless Acetabular System With Vitelene® Vitamin E Stabilized Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene
Evaluation Effectiveness of the Aesculap® Plasmafit Cementless Acetabular System in Combination With Vitelene® Polyethylene and Vitamin E Insert for Hip Arthroplasty
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Vladimir U Emelianov, MD PhD
- Phone Number: +79030633637
- Email: emelyanovv@orthoscheb.com
Study Locations
-
-
Chuvashia
-
Cheboksary, Chuvashia, Russian Federation, 429500
- Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Endoprosthetics
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Patients who need total knee replacmet surgury with a diagnosis
- Pertrochanteric fracture
- Disorder of continuity of tibia bone
- Osteoarthritis of hip
- Polyosteoarthritis
- Acquired deformity of musculoskeletal system
- Ankylosis of joint
- Rheumatoid arthritis
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients who needs total knee replacement surgery
- Informed consent from the patients.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Plasmafit® Vitelene® Vitamin E ceramic femoral heads
Plasmafit® Acetabular Cup System with Vitelene® is a highly crosslinked polyethylene stabilized with vitamin E and bioceramic femoral heads
|
Plasmafit® Acetabular Cup System with an insert Aesculap ® Vitelene ® Vitamin E Stabilized Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene and BIOLOX delta Ceramic Femoral Head or ISODUR® Metal Femoral Heads
Other Names:
|
|
Plasmafit® Vitelene® Vitamin E metal femoral heads
Plasmafit® Acetabular Cup System with Vitelene® is a highly crosslinked polyethylene stabilized with vitamin E and metal femoral heads
|
Plasmafit® Acetabular Cup System with an insert Aesculap ® Vitelene ® Vitamin E Stabilized Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene and BIOLOX delta Ceramic Femoral Head or ISODUR® Metal Femoral Heads
Other Names:
|
|
Plasmafit® polyethylene metal femoral heads
Plasmafit® Acetabular Cup System with polyethylene and metal femoral heads
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional assessments of hip joint replacement over time with Harris Hip Score (HHS)
Time Frame: 3 year follow-up
|
The HHS is a measure of dysfunction of the hip joint.
Consist of 10 items in 3 sections.
Score <70 = poor result; 70-80 = fair, 80-90 = good, and 90-100 = excellent.
|
3 year follow-up
|
|
Functional assessments of knee joint replacement over time with Knee Society Score (KSS)
Time Frame: 3 year follow-up
|
The KSS is a measure of dysfunction of the knee joint.
The KSS has a two sections: "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items).
Results can be interpreted with the following: 80-100 = excellent; score 70-79 = good; score 60-69 = fair; score <60 = poor.
|
3 year follow-up
|
|
Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) for knee joint, modified Rankin scale
Time Frame: 3 year follow-up
|
FJS-12 shows how much did the patient forget their artificial joint.
Consists of 12 items, each item is answered within a 5-point Likert scale, as follows: 0: never (0 p); almost never (1 p); seldom (2 p); sometimes (3 p); and mostly (4 p).
The initial raw data were converted to a scale ranging from 0 to 100 (worst to best).
|
3 year follow-up
|
|
Measuring postoperative pain using the visual analog scale for pain (VAS-P)
Time Frame: 3 year follow-up
|
To measure pain intensity after surgery the patients choose the score on the 10 cm line scale with (VAS-P) rage from 0 ('no pain') to 10 (severe pain).
|
3 year follow-up
|
|
The modified Rankin scale (mRS)
Time Frame: 3 year follow-up
|
mRS was used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities after joint replacement, with the following response options: 0: No symptoms at all; 1: No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2: Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3: Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4: Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5: Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6: Dead
|
3 year follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The assessment of the assessment of quality of life
Time Frame: 3 year follow-up
|
The assessment of quality of life using EQ-5D measure: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression based on a three-level version included "no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and unable to do/extreme".
|
3 year follow-up
|
|
Rentgenological assessments knee and hip replacement over time
Time Frame: 3 year follow-up
|
Rentgenological results based on standing anteroposterior pelvic radiograph with assesment version, acetabular interclination, depth, height, stability of endoprosthesis components, signs of wear on the insert, presence of osteolysis zones.
Installing additional locking screws, acetabular cup anteversion and inclination, limb length discrepancy after surgery.
|
3 year follow-up
|
|
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: 3 year follow-up
|
Period of occurrence and type of complications are recorded
|
3 year follow-up
|
|
Revision surgery
Time Frame: 1 year follow-up
|
The incidence of revision, time interval and types of incidence - one or two steps
|
1 year follow-up
|
|
The quality-adjusted life-year
Time Frame: 3 year follow-up
|
Measure of the value of health outcomes with using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey
|
3 year follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Nikolai U Nikolaev, MD PhD, Federal State Budgetary Organization, Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Arthroplasty
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Infections
- Joint Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Rheumatic Diseases
- Connective Tissue Diseases
- Arthritis
- Bacterial Infections
- Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
- Streptococcal Infections
- Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
- Osteoarthritis
- Osteoarthritis, Hip
- Rheumatic Fever
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Protective Agents
- Micronutrients
- Vitamins
- Antioxidants
- Vitamin E
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020-3
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.