Transapical Beating-heart Septal Myectomy in Patient With Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy

November 5, 2024 updated by: Xiang Wei

Minimally Invasive Transapical Septal Myectomy in the Beating Hearts for the Treatment of Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy: Safety and Efficacy Results of a Phase I First-in-man Clinical Trial

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, the safety and the efficacy of the transapical beating-heart septal myectomy for the treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. This is a prospective, single-arm, single-center, first-in-man study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Surgical septal myectomy remains the gold standard for the treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. However, conventional septal myectomy is hindered by the demanding expertise that is needed to sufficient relieve the obstruction of the left ventricle outflow tract while guarantee safety. To increase the visualization and minimize the surgical injury of conventional septal myectomy, we have invented a novel beating-heart myectomy device. Through a mini-thoractomy, septal myectomy could be accomplished via a transapical access in the beating heart using the beating-heart myectomy device. The whole process of resection is monitored, navigated, and evaluated by real-time transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography. Left ventricle outflow tract gradient and the grade of mitral regurgitation are evaluated each time after resection. Multiple resections are performed to tailor sufficient relief of left ventricle outflow tract obstruction and mitral regurgitation, while preventing iatrogenic injuries. After transapical beating-heart septal myectomy, patients is scheduled to be seen for follow-up visits at discharge (about 7 days post operation) and 3 months.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1000

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430000
        • Recruiting
        • Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical college, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients whose resting or provoked left ventricular outflow tract gradient > 50 mmHg, and maximal ventricular septal wall thickness ≥ 15 mm.
  2. Patients with heart function of New York Heart Association ≥ class II.
  3. Patients with drug-refractory symptoms or intolerable to pharmaceutical therapies.
  4. Patients who was informed the nature of the clinical trial, consented to participate in all of the activities of the clinical trial, and signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who were pregnant.
  2. Patients who had concomitant diseases such as intrinsic valvular disease or coronary artery disease that needed open-heart surgery.
  3. Patients who had severe heart failure with left ventricle ejection fraction < 40%.
  4. Patients whose estimated life expectancy < 12 m.
  5. Patient who were non-compliant.
  6. Patients under circumstances which were considered not suitable or prohibitive for participating the clinical trial at the discretion of the attending medical team and the researchers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy
Transapical beating-heart septal myectomy for the patient with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
Procedure: Transapical beating-heart septal myectomy
We have invented a beating-heart myectomy device.Through a minimally invasive intercostal incision, septal myectomy could be accomplished via a transapical access in the beating heart using the device. The whole process of resection is monitored, navigated, and evaluated by real-time transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography. Left ventricle outlet tract gradient and the grade of mitral regurgitation are evaluated each time after resection. Multiple resections are performed to tailor the muscular resection for sufficient relief of left ventricle outlet tract obstruction and mitral regurgitation, while preventing iatrogenic injuries.
Other Names:
  • Minimally invasive transapical septal myectomy in the beating hearts

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 3 months
Death from any cause during the observation period.
3 months
Procedural success
Time Frame: 3 months
Resting left ventricle outflow tract gradients < 30 mmHg, provoked left ventricle outflow tract gradients < 50 mmHg, and mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤ grade 1+.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device success
Time Frame: 1 day
Successful accession, delivery, and retrieval of the resection device, successful resection of the septal myocardium, resting left ventricle outflow tract gradient less than 50 mmHg and mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤ grade 2+ during operation after resection, and free from conversion to midline thoracotomy during operation.
1 day
Septal thickness
Time Frame: 7 days and 3 months
Basal and mid septal thickness as measured by echocardiography.
7 days and 3 months
Left ventricle mass
Time Frame: 3 months
Left ventricle mass index (the ratio of left ventricle mass to body weight) as measured by cardiac magnetic resonance.
3 months
Left ventricle volume
Time Frame: 7 days and 3 months
Left ventricle end-diastolic volume as measured by echocardiography.
7 days and 3 months
Cardiac diastolic function
Time Frame: 7 days and 3 months
The ratio between early mitral inflow velocity and mitral annular early diastolic velocity ( E/e') as measured by echocardiography.
7 days and 3 months
Left atria volume
Time Frame: 7 days and 3 months
The left atria volume as measured by echocardiography.
7 days and 3 months
Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events
Time Frame: 3 months
In-hospital mortality, atrioventricular block that need permanent pacemaker implantation, sternotomy conversion, iatrogenic ventricular septal perforation, iatrogenic valvular injury, imaging examination-validated cerebral complications.
3 months
New York Heart Association class
Time Frame: 7 days and 3 months
New York Heart Association class, including grade I, grade II, grade III, grade IV. A higher grade means worse heart function.
7 days and 3 months
6-minute walking test
Time Frame: 3 months
6-minute walking test. A longer distance means better heart function.
3 months
Heart function-associated quality of life
Time Frame: 7 days and 3 months
Score of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. A higher score means better heart function.
7 days and 3 months
Left ventricular outflow tract gradient
Time Frame: 7 days and 3 months
Left ventricular outflow tract gradient as measured by echocardiography.
7 days and 3 months
Evaluation of the mitral valve
Time Frame: 7 days and 3 months
Grade of mitral regurgitation and systolic anterior motion as measured by echocardiography.
7 days and 3 months
Left ventricular outflow tract diameter
Time Frame: 7 days and 3 months
Left ventricular outflow tract diameter as measured by echocardiography.
7 days and 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Xiang Wei

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Xiang Wei, M.D., Tongji Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 5, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2022-S013 2022-N016

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All of the conclusive participant data, after removing the individual information of privacy, will be uploaded as supporting information when publishing the current study.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the current study is published.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

All readers who were interested in the current study.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings