MMG vs. EMG for Cortical Breach Detection
Prospective Evaluation of Mechanomyography Versus Triggered Electromyography for Intraoperative Assessment of Cortical Breaches During Instrumented Lumbar Spine Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: H. Francis Farhadi, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 859-323-5661
- Email: francis.farhadi@uky.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Jaimie Hixson, BS
- Phone Number: 8593231908
- Email: jlhend3@uky.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Kentucky
-
Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536
- University Of Kentucky
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- scheduled to undergo a one-, two-, or three-level posterolateral spinal fusion surgery using Depuy Synthes Expedium pedicle screw instrumentation.
- over the age of 18 years old
- unresponsive to conservative care for a minimum of 6 months
- psychosocially, mentally, and physically able to fully consent and comply with this protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
- preexisting medical condition or comorbidity that makes them a poor candidate
- open wound local to the operative area, or rapid joint disease, bone absorption, or osteoporosis
- requires medications that may interfere with bone or soft tissue healing
- active local or systemic infection
- metal sensitivity/foreign body sensitivity
- implanted pacemaker
- morbidly obese, defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than 45
- osteoporosis
- involved in or planning to engage in litigation or receiving Workers Compensation related to neck or back pain.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intraoperative MMG vs EMG for cortical breach detection
Participants in this arm will be assessed with both MMG and EMG during their lower spine fusion surgery.
|
Triggered electromyography will be used during surgery to detect nerve impingement by pedicle screws used for spinal fusion.
Threshold stimulation data from the device will be recorded.
SENTIO MMG ball tip probe will be used during surgery to detect nerve impingement by pedicle screws used for spinal fusion.
Threshold stimulation data from the device will be recorded, and the accuracy compared to the data from the triggered electromyography.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Success of Pedicle Screw Trajectories
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Patients with successful pedicle screw trajectories determined by the percentage of patients with A/B or C/D/E breaches.
|
1 hour
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Short-From (SF-36) Health Survey
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 months after surgery
|
This survey quantifies how a patient feels about their health, and how well they are able to do common activities.
This survey has 9 domains that assess the patients functional ability.
The domains are scored as percentages from 0%-100% with 0% being severely limited and 100% being no deficits.
|
6 weeks and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Questionnaire for Pain.
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
|
This survey is used to assess pain experienced by the subject and the severity of the pain.
Types of pain include numbness, pins and needles, dull aching, burning sensation, muscle cramps, and stabbing pain.
Pain severity is rated on a scale of 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
Pain is assessed in the back and legs.
Changes reported as percentages using the formula [(Average measure at 3 months - Average measure at baseline)/Average measure at baseline].
|
3 months after surgery
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Oswestry Disability Index Version 2.1A
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
|
This survey is used to quantify disability for low back pain.
There are five disability categories ranging from minimally disabled to crippled.
The appropriate disability category is determined by the sum of the subjects points divided by the total possible points(50) times 100.
This yields a % disabled score and this % determines the appropriate category designation.
0% is equated with no disability and 100% is the maximum disability possible.
Changes reported as percentages using the formula [(Average measure at 3 months - Average measure at baseline)/Average measure at baseline]
|
3 months after surgery
|
|
Change From Baseline in the PROMIS Global-10
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
|
This questionnaire is a 10 item patient reported tool used to quantify the patients general healthcare related quality of life.
It assesses both physical and mental health and is scored as a percentage.
Scores closer to 100% report a better quality of life than those who score lower.
Changes reported as percentages using the formula [(Average measure at 3 months - Average measure at baseline)/Average measure at baseline]
|
3 months after surgery
|
|
Hospital Readmission at 30 Days
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Percent of patients undergoing hospital readmission 30 days following the procedure.
|
30 days
|
|
Hospital Readmission at 90 Days
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Percent of patients undergoing hospital readmission 90 days following the procedure.
|
90 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: H. Francis Farhadi, MD, PhD, University Of Kentucky
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 76122
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.