A Study of Olezarsen (Formerly Known as AKCEA-APOCIII-LRx) in Adults With Hypertriglyceridemia and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (Established or at Increased Risk for), and/or With Severe Hypertriglyceridemia

April 2, 2026 updated by: Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2b Study of ISIS 678354 in Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (Established or at Increased Risk for), and/or With Severe Hypertriglyceridemia

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of olezarsen on percent change in fasting triglyceride (TG) levels compared to placebo at Months 6 and 12 and the proportion of participants who achieve different thresholds in fasting TG. Other objectives were to evaluate the effect of olezarsen on percent change in fasting apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III), very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), remnant cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), HDL-C, total cholesterol (TC), apolipoprotein B (apoB), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and apolipoprotein A-1 (apoA-1).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This was a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in participants with hypertriglyceridemia (triglycerides > 150 milligrams per deciliter [mg/dL]) and established or at increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and/or with severe hypertriglyceridemia. The study had an up to 8-week screening period, a 53-week treatment period, and a 13-week post-treatment follow-up period.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
154

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
      • Québec, Canada, G1V 4W2
        • Clinique des Maladies Lipidiques de Quebec Inc.
    • Ontario
      • Sarnia, Ontario, Canada, N7T 4X3
        • Bluewater Clinical Research Group Inc
    • Quebec
      • Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada, G7H 7K9
        • Ecogene-21
  • United States
    • California
      • Lincoln, California, United States, 95648
        • Clinical Trials Research
      • Montclair, California, United States, 91763
        • Catalina Research Institute, LLC
    • Florida
      • Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33434
        • Excel Medical Clinical Trials, LLC
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33184
        • De La Cruz Research Center
      • New Port Richey, Florida, United States, 34652
        • Suncoast Clinical Research, Inc.
      • Winter Park, Florida, United States, 32792
        • Research Physicians Network Alliance
    • Georgia
      • Columbus, Georgia, United States, 31904
        • IACT Health
    • Illinois
      • Evanston, Illinois, United States, 60201
        • Evanston Premier Healthcare Research
      • Gurnee, Illinois, United States, 60031
        • Clinical Investigation Specialist
    • Iowa
      • Council Bluffs, Iowa, United States, 51501
        • West Broadway Clinic
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40213
        • Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center (L-MARC)
    • Michigan
      • Flint, Michigan, United States, 48504
        • Aa Mrc, Llc
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89148
        • Palm Research Center, Inc.
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89121
        • Clinical Research of South Nevada
    • Pennsylvania
      • Lansdale, Pennsylvania, United States, 19446
        • Green and Seidner Family Practice Associates
    • South Carolina
      • Little River, South Carolina, United States, 29566
        • Main Street Physicians Care Waterway
    • South Dakota
      • Rapid City, South Dakota, United States, 57702
        • Health Concepts
    • Tennessee
      • Tullahoma, Tennessee, United States, 37388
        • Tennessee Center for Clinical Trials
    • Texas
      • Mesquite, Texas, United States, 75149
        • Southern Endocrinology Associates
    • Virginia
      • Manassas, Virginia, United States, 20110
        • Manassas Clinical Research Center
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23504
        • York Clinical Research LLC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged ≥ 18 years at the time of informed consent

  2. Fall into at least 1 of the following groups (a or b):

    1. Hypertriglyceridemia with fasting TG ≥ 150 mg/dL (1.69 millimoles per liter [mmol/L]) and < 500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L) with either clinical diagnosis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or at increased risk for ASCVD
    2. Severe hypertriglyceridemia with fasting TG ≥ 500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L).
  3. Participants must be on standard-of-care (SOC), lipid-lowering medications per local guidelines.
  4. Participants must be willing to comply with diet and lifestyle recommendations as able.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diabetes with any of the following:

    1. Newly diagnosed within 12 weeks of screening
    2. Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) ≥ 9.5% at Screening
    3. Change in basal insulin regimen > 20% within 3 months prior to Screening
    4. For participants with type 1 diabetes: episode of diabetic ketoacidosis, or ≥ 3 episodes of severe hypoglycemia within 6 months prior to Screening
  2. Acute coronary syndrome or stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months prior to Screening
  3. Major surgery, peripheral revascularization, or non-urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 3 months prior to Screening, or upcoming planned major surgery or major procedure (e.g., arterial revascularization) during the course of the study
  4. Active pancreatitis within 4 weeks prior to Screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants received olezarsen-matching placebo, as a single subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks for 53 weeks treatment period.
Drug: Placebo
SC injection.
Experimental: Olezarsen 50 mg
Participants received olezarsen 50 mg, as a single 0.5 milliliters (mL) SC injection, once every 4 weeks for 53 weeks treatment period.
Drug: Olezarsen
SC injection.
Other Names:
  • ISIS 678354
  • AKCEA-APOCIII-LRx
Experimental: Olezarsen 80 mg
Participants received olezarsen 80 mg, as a single 0.8 mL SC injection, once every 4 weeks for 53 weeks treatment period.
Drug: Olezarsen
SC injection.
Other Names:
  • ISIS 678354
  • AKCEA-APOCIII-LRx

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting TG at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the jump to reference (J2R) approach.
Baseline, Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting TG at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fasting TG <150 mg/dL (1.69 Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at Month 6 With Baseline TG <500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 6
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fasting TG <150 mg/dL (1.69 mmol/L) at Month 12 With Baseline TG <500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein C-III (ApoC-III) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting ApoC-III at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Very Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Non-HDL-C at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting HDL-C at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline Fasting Remnant Cholesterol (Remnant-C) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Remnant-C at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting ApoB at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoA-1) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting ApoA-1 at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting LDL-C at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Total-C at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fasting TG <500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L) With Baseline TG ≥500 mg/dL at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 6
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fasting TG <500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L) With Baseline TG ≥500 mg/dL at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period. If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline. Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53. If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used. Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
Baseline, Month 12
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Events
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
All adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) that consistently occurred during the study with an event of acute pancreatitis were adjudicated by a blinded, independent committee according to the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis as outlined in the Acute Pancreatitis Adjudication Committee (PAC) Charter. These events were categorized as 1) documented pancreatitis, 2) probable pancreatitis, 3) possible pancreatitis, 4) unable to adjudicate and 5) no diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Number of participants with adjudicated acute pancreatitis events were reported.
Up to 12 months
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Events (≥2 Events in 5 Years Prior to Enrollment)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
The adjudicated acute pancreatitis event rates were compared between pooled olezarsen treatment and placebo group using a negative binomial regression model or Poisson regression model with the treatment group and natural log transformed baseline fasting TG as the factors, and number of adjudicated acute pancreatitis events in 5 years prior to enrollment as a covariate. The logarithm of time in year that each participant observed during the treatment period were used as an offset variable. Number of participants with adjudicated acute pancreatitis events with ≥2 events in 5 years prior to enrollment were reported.
Up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 9, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 22, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 21, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 2, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ISIS 678354-CS8

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings