- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05355402
A Study of Olezarsen (Formerly Known as AKCEA-APOCIII-LRx) in Adults With Hypertriglyceridemia and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (Established or at Increased Risk for), and/or With Severe Hypertriglyceridemia
April 2, 2026 updated by: Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2b Study of ISIS 678354 in Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (Established or at Increased Risk for), and/or With Severe Hypertriglyceridemia
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of olezarsen on percent change in fasting triglyceride (TG) levels compared to placebo at Months 6 and 12 and the proportion of participants who achieve different thresholds in fasting TG.
Other objectives were to evaluate the effect of olezarsen on percent change in fasting apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III), very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), remnant cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), HDL-C, total cholesterol (TC), apolipoprotein B (apoB), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and apolipoprotein A-1 (apoA-1).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This was a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in participants with hypertriglyceridemia (triglycerides > 150 milligrams per deciliter [mg/dL]) and established or at increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and/or with severe hypertriglyceridemia.
The study had an up to 8-week screening period, a 53-week treatment period, and a 13-week post-treatment follow-up period.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
154
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Québec, Canada, G1V 4W2
- Clinique des Maladies Lipidiques de Quebec Inc.
-
-
Ontario
-
Sarnia, Ontario, Canada, N7t 4X3
- Bluewater Clinical Research Group Inc
-
-
Quebec
-
Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada, G7H 7K9
- Ecogene-21
-
-
-
-
California
-
Lincoln, California, United States, 95648
- Clinical Trials Research
-
Montclair, California, United States, 91763
- Catalina Research Institute, LLC
-
-
Florida
-
Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33434
- Excel Medical Clinical Trials, LLC
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33184
- De La Cruz Research Center
-
New Port Richey, Florida, United States, 34652
- Suncoast Clinical Research, Inc.
-
Winter Park, Florida, United States, 32792
- Research Physicians Network Alliance
-
-
Georgia
-
Columbus, Georgia, United States, 31904
- IACT Health
-
-
Illinois
-
Evanston, Illinois, United States, 60201
- Evanston Premier Healthcare Research
-
Gurnee, Illinois, United States, 60031
- Clinical Investigation Specialist
-
-
Iowa
-
Council Bluffs, Iowa, United States, 51501
- West Broadway Clinic
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40213
- Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center (L-MARC)
-
-
Michigan
-
Flint, Michigan, United States, 48504
- Aa Mrc, Llc
-
-
Nevada
-
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89148
- Palm Research Center, Inc.
-
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89121
- Clinical Research of South Nevada
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Lansdale, Pennsylvania, United States, 19446
- Green and Seidner Family Practice Associates
-
-
South Carolina
-
Little River, South Carolina, United States, 29566
- Main Street Physicians Care Waterway
-
-
South Dakota
-
Rapid City, South Dakota, United States, 57702
- Health Concepts
-
-
Tennessee
-
Tullahoma, Tennessee, United States, 37388
- Tennessee Center for Clinical Trials
-
-
Texas
-
Mesquite, Texas, United States, 75149
- Southern Endocrinology Associates
-
-
Virginia
-
Manassas, Virginia, United States, 20110
- Manassas Clinical Research Center
-
Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23504
- York Clinical Research LLC
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged ≥ 18 years at the time of informed consent
Fall into at least 1 of the following groups (a or b):
- Hypertriglyceridemia with fasting TG ≥ 150 mg/dL (1.69 millimoles per liter [mmol/L]) and < 500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L) with either clinical diagnosis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or at increased risk for ASCVD
- Severe hypertriglyceridemia with fasting TG ≥ 500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L).
- Participants must be on standard-of-care (SOC), lipid-lowering medications per local guidelines.
- Participants must be willing to comply with diet and lifestyle recommendations as able.
Exclusion Criteria:
Diabetes with any of the following:
- Newly diagnosed within 12 weeks of screening
- Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) ≥ 9.5% at Screening
- Change in basal insulin regimen > 20% within 3 months prior to Screening
- For participants with type 1 diabetes: episode of diabetic ketoacidosis, or ≥ 3 episodes of severe hypoglycemia within 6 months prior to Screening
- Acute coronary syndrome or stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months prior to Screening
- Major surgery, peripheral revascularization, or non-urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 3 months prior to Screening, or upcoming planned major surgery or major procedure (e.g., arterial revascularization) during the course of the study
- Active pancreatitis within 4 weeks prior to Screening
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants received olezarsen-matching placebo, as a single subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks for 53 weeks treatment period.
|
SC injection.
|
|
Experimental: Olezarsen 50 mg
Participants received olezarsen 50 mg, as a single 0.5 milliliters (mL) SC injection, once every 4 weeks for 53 weeks treatment period.
|
SC injection.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Olezarsen 80 mg
Participants received olezarsen 80 mg, as a single 0.8 mL SC injection, once every 4 weeks for 53 weeks treatment period.
|
SC injection.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting TG at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the jump to reference (J2R) approach.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting TG at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 12
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fasting TG <150 mg/dL (1.69 Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at Month 6 With Baseline TG <500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fasting TG <150 mg/dL (1.69 mmol/L) at Month 12 With Baseline TG <500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 12
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein C-III (ApoC-III) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting ApoC-III at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 12
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Very Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 12
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Non-HDL-C at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 12
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting HDL-C at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 12
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline Fasting Remnant Cholesterol (Remnant-C) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Remnant-C at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 12
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting ApoB at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 12
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoA-1) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting ApoA-1 at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 12
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting LDL-C at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 12
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Total-C at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 12
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fasting TG <500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L) With Baseline TG ≥500 mg/dL at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 6 was defined as the average of Weeks 25 and 27.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fasting TG <500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L) With Baseline TG ≥500 mg/dL at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
|
Baseline was defined as the average of the pre-dose measurement on Day 1 and all non-missing measurements from the qualification period.
If the Day 1 pre-dose and qualification period measurements were all missing, then the last non-missing measurement from the screening period was used as baseline.
Month 12 was defined as the average of Weeks 51 and 53.
If 1 of the 2 assessments was missing, then the non-missing assessment was used.
Missing data after the last observed value for participants in the olezarsen arms were imputed using the J2R approach.
|
Baseline, Month 12
|
|
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Events
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
|
All adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) that consistently occurred during the study with an event of acute pancreatitis were adjudicated by a blinded, independent committee according to the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis as outlined in the Acute Pancreatitis Adjudication Committee (PAC) Charter.
These events were categorized as 1) documented pancreatitis, 2) probable pancreatitis, 3) possible pancreatitis, 4) unable to adjudicate and 5) no diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.
Number of participants with adjudicated acute pancreatitis events were reported.
|
Up to 12 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Acute Pancreatitis Events (≥2 Events in 5 Years Prior to Enrollment)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
|
The adjudicated acute pancreatitis event rates were compared between pooled olezarsen treatment and placebo group using a negative binomial regression model or Poisson regression model with the treatment group and natural log transformed baseline fasting TG as the factors, and number of adjudicated acute pancreatitis events in 5 years prior to enrollment as a covariate.
The logarithm of time in year that each participant observed during the treatment period were used as an offset variable.
Number of participants with adjudicated acute pancreatitis events with ≥2 events in 5 years prior to enrollment were reported.
|
Up to 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 9, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 22, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
December 21, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 26, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
May 2, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 23, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 2, 2026
Last Verified
April 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ISIS 678354-CS8
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hypertriglyceridemia
-
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.RecruitingHypertriglyceridemia | Severe HypertriglyceridemiaUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyRecruitingSevere HypertriglyceridemiaUnited States, China, Japan, Canada
-
Arrowhead PharmaceuticalsCompletedSevere HypertriglyceridemiaUnited States, Australia, Canada, Germany, Hungary, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland
-
AstraZenecaCompletedSevere HypertriglyceridemiaUnited States, Hungary, India, Russian Federation, Denmark, Ukraine, Netherlands
-
AstraZenecaRadiant ResearchCompletedSevere HypertriglyceridemiaUnited States
-
Trygg Pharma, Inc.UnknownSevere HypertriglyceridemiaUnited States
-
SUNHO(China)BioPharmaceutical CO., Ltd.Not yet recruitingHealthy Subjects | Hyperlipidemia, HypertriglyceridemiaChina
-
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedSevere HypertriglyceridemiaFinland, United States, France, Israel, Netherlands, Denmark, Spain, Australia, United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Canada, Czechia, Hungary, Bulgaria, New Zealand, Sweden, South Africa, Poland, Norway, Portugal, Slovakia, Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Arrowhead PharmaceuticalsActive, not recruitingSevere HypertriglyceridemiaUnited States, Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Croatia, Czechia, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, United Kingdom
-
89bio, Inc.Active, not recruitingSevere HypertriglyceridemiaUnited States, Puerto Rico, Hungary, Poland, Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Czechia, France, Georgia, Germany, India, Italy, Latvia, Mexico, Spain, United Kingdom
Clinical Trials on Placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
AkesoNot yet recruitingAtopic DermatitisChina
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalUnknownHypertension | DyslipidemiasKorea, Republic of