Sodium Lowering Vascular Effects Trial (SOLVE)

November 20, 2024 updated by: Katherine T Mills, Tulane University

A Mechanistic Trial of Dietary Sodium Reduction on Vascular Structure and Function

The proposed mechanistic trial will test the effect of dietary sodium reduction on cardiac and vascular structure and function in those with elevated blood pressure or hypertension. Findings from this study will fill the knowledge gap on the underlying mechanisms of dietary sodium intake on cardiovascular disease risk in addition to blood pressure and could provide further evidence on sodium reduction for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

High dietary sodium intake increases risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) independent of established risk factors, including blood pressure (BP). Non-BP mediated mechanisms underlying the increased risk of CVD associated with dietary sodium intake are not well understood, but observational studies suggest direct target organ damage in the heart and vasculature might play an important role. Little evidence exists from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on target organ effects of dietary sodium reduction, and the National Academy of Medicine has recommended future research to "test the effects of different sodium intake levels on endothelial and vascular function" in order to "to better characterize the relationship between sodium intake and chronic disease". The overall objective of the proposed mechanistic trial is to test the effect of dietary sodium reduction on cardiac and vascular structure and function. Specifically, the proposed trial will test whether dietary sodium reduction (targeting a dietary sodium intake of <2,300 mg/day) will improve left ventricular mass index (LVMI), left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), and flow-mediated dilation (FMD) compared to usual intake. Additionally, we will test whether this effect is independent from BP reduction. We will recruit 256 people with elevated BP or hypertension from the greater New Orleans area and randomly assign them to a dietitian-led behavioral intervention aimed at decreasing dietary sodium intake to <2,300 mg/day for 12 months or to a usual diet. Study outcomes, including cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)-determined LVMI and LVGLS, cfPWV, and FMD, will be measured at baseline, 6-month, and 12-month clinic visits using standardized protocols with stringent quality control. These outcomes are validated biomarkers for target organ damage and predict the risk of clinical CVD events. In primary analyses, the effect of sodium reduction on each subclinical CVD endpoint will be compared between the sodium reduction and usual diet groups according to the intention-to-treat principle without adjusting for covariates. In secondary analyses, changes in ambulatory and clinical BP will be adjusted to assess the BP-independent effect of dietary sodium reduction on each subclinical CVD endpoint. The proposed trial has 85% statistical power to detect a clinically significant difference in changes of the four co-primary outcomes (10 g/m2 in LVMI, 1.3% in LVGLS, 0.9 m/s in cfPWV, and 1.1% in FMD) over 12 months between the two groups at a 2-sided significance level of 0.0125 (0.05/4). Findings from this trial will fill the knowledge gap of the underlying mechanisms of dietary sodium intake on CVD risk and provide further evidence on sodium reduction for CVD prevention.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
256

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
        • Recruiting
        • Tulane University Office of Health Research
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men or women aged ≥40 years. Individuals <40 years are at a low risk for clinical and subclinical CVD
  • Elevated BP or hypertension (systolic BP ≥120 mmHg and diastolic BP ≥80 mmHg with or without use of antihypertensive medications)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 or end-stage renal disease (kidney transplant or chronic dialysis)
  • History of cardiovascular disease
  • Shift worker or regularly work at night
  • Cancer requiring chemotherapy or radiation treatment in the previous two years
  • Current pregnancy or breastfeeding or plans to become pregnant during the study
  • Consumption of ≥21 alcoholic drinks/week
  • Current participation in another lifestyle intervention or drug trial
  • Current residence or planned residence that makes it difficult to meet trial requirements
  • Other concerns regarding ability to meet trial requirements (at the discretion of the study coordinator)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: sodium reduction intervention
The sodium reduction intervention is a dietician-led behavioral intervention consisting of two phases, first a 3-month intensive intervention phase, followed by a 9-month maintenance phase. The overall goal of the intervention is to reduce sodium intake to <2,300 mg per day based on the most recent guideline from the National Academies of Medicine. Both phases will include individual and group behavioral modification counseling designed to facilitate a reduction in dietary sodium intake.
Behavioral: Sodium Reduction Intervention
The sodium reduction intervention is a dietician-led behavioral intervention consisting of two phases, first a 3-month intensive intervention phase, followed by a 9-month maintenance phase. The overall goal of the intervention is to reduce sodium intake to <2,300 mg per day based on the most recent guideline from the National Academies of Medicine. Both phases will include individual and group behavioral modification counseling designed to facilitate a reduction in dietary sodium intake.
No Intervention: Usual Diet
Participants randomized to the usual diet group will receive standard care from their providers with no study intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain (LVGLS) from baseline to 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging will be used to determine LVGLS.
12 months
Change in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) from baseline to 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging will be used to determine left ventricular mass (LVM). LVM will be indexed to body surface area.
12 months
Change in Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) from baseline to 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
A carotid tonometer will be used to measure carotid-femoral PWV.
12 months
Change in Flow-Mediated Dilation (FMD) from baseline to 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Endothelial-dependent FMD will be quantified using high resolution ultrasound.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Left Ventricular Volumes
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging will be used to determine left ventricular volumes.
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Left Atrial Maximum and Minimum Volume
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging will be used to determine left atrial maximum and minimum volumes.
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Left Atrial Ejection Fraction
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging will be used to determine left atrial ejection fraction.
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Left Atrial Global Strain
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging will be used to determine left atrial global strain.
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging will be used to determine aortic pulse wave velocity.
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tulane University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Johns Hopkins University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Katherine T Mills, PhD, Tulane University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 25, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 19, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 20, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R01HL155559 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Our study data sharing plan will comply with all NIH policies for data sharing. Data sharing will be executed through the centralized NIH data repository and will be implemented in a timely manner. The study data, including data from baseline and follow-up visits, will be prepared for transmission to the NHLBI data repository - the Biologic Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center (BioLINCC). Data will be prepared by the study coordinating center and sent to the PO for review prior to release. These data will be free of identifiers that allow identification of individual research participants either directly or through "deductive disclosure." In addition, we will offer, through our public access website, opportunities for outside investigators to collaborate with us using complete study data.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data sets will be submitted to the NHLBI Program Official (PO) no later than 3 years after the end of the final patient follow-up or 2 years after the main paper of the trial has been published, whichever comes first.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Upon request

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings