One-month Latent Tuberculosis Treatment for Renal Transplant Candidates

January 16, 2026 updated by: Pinki Bhatt, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
This is a prospective, single-center, single-arm, open-label study investigating the safety, compliance and pharmacokinetics of 1-month treatment of Isoniazid, Rifapentine and Vitamin B6 in renal transplant candidates.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) or inactive tuberculosis, is a common disease found in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who are being considered for renal transplant (RT). Approximately 5-15% of patients with LTBI will convert to an active form of TB, especially in patients with a weak immune system. Given the morbidity and mortality associated with active TB disease along with the public health threat, LTBI is routinely treated in pre-transplant candidates. While treatment with isoniazid (INH) for 9 months is the mainstay of therapy, its use poses some clinical challenges due to the prolonged duration of treatment, risk of adverse drug effects, and suboptimal compliance and treatment completion. In addition to these challenges, the consequences of delays in transplant due to the time it takes to complete current treatment options are notable. Most recently, there is a large international, randomized, prospective, phase 3 clinical trial by Swindell et al., that found that 1 month of INH and Rifapentine (1m-INH-RPT) compared to the standard 9-month regimen of INH in HIV patients with LTBI had similar TB incidence in both treatment arms but higher compliance rate and fewer adverse events for patients taking 1m-INH-RPT. Given these findings, if a similar study can be conducted in renal transplant candidate population, it can alleviate the aforementioned challenges being faced in RT candidates. Thus, this is a single-arm, open-label, prospective clinical trial investigating the safety, compliance, pharmacokinetics of 1m-INH-RPT in RT candidates.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
25

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08901
        • Pinki J Bhatt

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and Women Age > 18
  • Weight > 30 kg
  • End-stage renal disease
  • Living-related or deceased kidney transplant candidate (not on the waitlist) deemed by their transplant nephrologist
  • Negative serum OR urine pregnancy test
  • Evidence of latent tuberculosis or high risk for tuberculosis: (1) Confirmed positive tuberculin skin test (TST) ≥ 5 mm or positive quantiferon gold test/T-spot and a chest radiograph or chest CT scan without evidence of active pulmonary TB OR (2) Patients with negative TST or quantiferon gold/T-spot test but high risk for tuberculosis are eligible if they have (i) radiographic evidence of previous TB (stable fibronodular changes, including scarring [peribronchial fibrosis, bronchiectasis, and architectural distortion] and nodular opacities in the apical and upper lung zones) and no history of adequate treatment, or (ii) have had close and prolonged contact with a case of active TB.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years
  • Absolute neutrophil count of <750 cells/mm3
  • Hemoglobin < 7.4 g/dL
  • Platelets < 50 x 10E3/uL
  • AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) > 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Total bilirubin > 2.5 times the ULN
  • Presence of active TB
  • Prior history of treatment for active TB or LTBI
  • Known exposure to multidrug-resistant TB
  • Known history of or active porphyria
  • History of liver cirrhosis
  • Evidence of active acute hepatitis
  • Peripheral neuropathy > grade 2
  • Active drug or alcohol dependence in opinion of investigator that will interfere with adherence
  • On non-modifiable medications with significant drug interactions with Rifapentine or INH
  • On medications known to cause hepatoxicity and/or neutropenia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: 1 month Rifapentine, Isoniazid and Vitamin B6

Participants will receive 28 days of self-administered daily doses of RPT, INH, and pyridoxine (vitamin B6).

There are no multiple arms or multiple interventions. All participants will receive all 3 drugs. There are no comparators.
Drug: 1 month Rifapentine, Isoniazid and Vitamin B6
Participants will be treated with one month (4 weeks) of daily Isoniazid, Rifapentine and Vitamin B6.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of adverse events with 1-m INH/RPT/Vit B6
Time Frame: 28 days
Treatment discontinuation due to adverse reaction of study drug determined by investigator
28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of treatment compliance
Time Frame: 28 days
Percentage of daily dosage taken within the 28 day course
28 days
Rate of treatment completion
Time Frame: 28 days
Completion of 28 day course within a 5 week period
28 days

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of reactivation of active tuberculosis
Time Frame: 2 years
Rate of culture-confirmed tuberculosis disease after completing study regimen
2 years
Trough drug concentration
Time Frame: 28 days
Isoniazid and Rifapentine serum drug concentration
28 days
3-hour post-dose drug concentration
Time Frame: 28 days
Isoniazid and Rifapentine serum drug concentration
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Pinki Bhatt, MD, Rutgers

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 16, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 6, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 16, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro2018001735

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings