20% Albumin vs. Balanced Salt Solution as Resuscitation Fluid in Cirrhosis With Sepsis Induced Hypotension

June 28, 2022 updated by: Madhumita Premkumar, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

To Compare 20% Albumin vs. Balanced Salt Solution as Resuscitation Fluid and Identify Fluid Responsiveness Criteria in Critically Ill Patients With Cirrhosis With Sepsis Induced Hypotension; a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Patients with cirrhosis patients have a high incidence of sepsis which can trigger decompensation and may result in prolonged hospital stay and increased mortality. About 30%-50% admissions of patients with cirrhosis have sepsis at presentation and about 15% patients admitted to hospital develop sepsis during the hospital stay . After infection develops, the patient may develop acute kidney injury (AKI), shock, encephalopathy or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) further decreasing the chances of survival. In fact, sepsis in patients with cirrhosis is associated with 15% in-hospital mortality, approximately double that of patients without sepsis. So, sepsis is directly responsible for 30-50% of deaths in cirrhosis . Therefore, it is critical to manage sepsis early and appropriately in cirrhosis to reduce the complications and mortality. Early administration of fluids, source control and empirical antibiotics along with vasopressors if refractory shock are essential components of treatment in all patients with sepsis. Currently, the most accepted strategy for early sepsis management is a combination of early goal directed therapy (EGDT) and physiological parameters, such as urine output, lactate clearance, and administration of antibiotics, within 1 hour of presentation . The use of central venous pressure assessment is fallacious for gauging adequacy of fluid resuscitation in cirrhosis, and the difficulty of performing echocardiographic assessments in the setting of ascites and cirrhotic cardiomyopathy is also well described .

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
150

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • India
      • Chandigarh, India, 160012
        • Recruiting
        • Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical/Imaging or Biopsy proven liver cirrhosis of any etiology who consent for enrolment.
  • Hypotension (Mean arterial pressure <65mmHg or Systolic blood pressure <90mmHg)
  • Aged between18-65 yrs

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Already received colloid or more than 2 litres of fluid without baseline echocardiographic assessment.
  • Already on vasopressors/inotropes
  • Severe pre-existing cardiopulmonary disease
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
  • Active bleeding like variceal bleed
  • Cerebrovascular events
  • Chronic renal disease - End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)/ patient on renal replacement therapy
  • Admission to ICU following liver transplantation, burns, cardiac surgery
  • Brain death or likely brain death within 24 hours
  • Previous adverse reaction to human albumin solution
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Informed consent refused by patient or attendants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: 20% Albumin arm
20% Albumin in a dose of 20-40 gm per day as infusion over 12-24 h
Drug: 20% albumin
Albumin arm for resuscitation fluid
Drug: Balanced salt solution
Only Balanced salt solution will be used.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Balanced salt solution arm
Fluid resuscitation protocol includes use of an immediate 500 ml bolus of crystalloid i.e., balanced salt solution (BSS) or 0.9% normal saline (Rescue phase), followed by 20 ml/kg fluid in the first 6 hours titrated to target MAP of > 65mmHg.The second phase of fluid resuscitation (Optimization phase) will be performed as per IVC targets, attainment of lactate clearance, and LUS score to prevent overload.
Drug: Balanced salt solution
Only Balanced salt solution will be used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension and assess IVC dynamics.
Time Frame: At enrolment
To compare the IVC dynamics in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension
At enrolment
To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension and assess IVC dynamics.
Time Frame: At 6 hours
To compare the IVC dynamics in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension
At 6 hours
To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension and assess IVC dynamics.
Time Frame: At 24 hours
To compare the IVC dynamics in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension
At 24 hours
To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension and assess IVC dynamics.
Time Frame: At 48 hours.
To compare the IVC dynamics in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension
At 48 hours.
To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension and assess dynamic changes in cardiac output, stroke volume and E/e' echocardiographic parameters.
Time Frame: At enrolment
To compare the cardiac output in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension
At enrolment
To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension and assess dynamic changes in cardiac output, stroke volume and E/e' echocardiographic parameters.
Time Frame: At 24 hours
To compare the cardiac output in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension
At 24 hours
To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension and assess dynamic changes in cardiac output, stroke volume and E/e' echocardiographic parameters.
Time Frame: At 48 hours.
To compare the cardiac output in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension
At 48 hours.
To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension and assess new onset of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) or acute kidney injury (AKI)
Time Frame: At enrolment
To compare the new onset of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) or acute kidney injury (AKI)in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension
At enrolment
To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension and assess new onset of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) or acute kidney injury (AKI)
Time Frame: At 48 hours.
To compare the new onset of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) or acute kidney injury (AKI)in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension
At 48 hours.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Urinary marker of AKI (NGal)
Time Frame: At enrolment
At enrolment
Change in urinary markers of AKI (NGal)
Time Frame: At 24 hours.
At 24 hours.
Change in urinary markers of AKI(NGal)
Time Frame: At 48 hours.
At 48 hours.
To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension., and assess vasopressor requirement
Time Frame: At enrolment
To compare the vasopressor requirement in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension
At enrolment
To compare the efficacy of 20% Albumin vs Plasmalyte in the first 3 -6 hours of volume resuscitation in cirrhosis with sepsis induced hypotension., and assess vasopressor requirement
Time Frame: At 24 hours
To compare the vasopressor requirement in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis induced hypotension
At 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 15, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 28, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 28, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IEC/11/2019/1496

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings