SWAP-MEAT Athlete: Three Diets on Athletic Performance
SWAP-MEAT (Study With Appetizing Plant-Food, Meat Eating Alternatives Trial) Athlete
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Stanford, California, United States, 94305
- Stanford University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Generally healthy omnivorous adults between 18 and 35 years of age who report typically consuming at least 1 serving of meat per day and are willing to consume ~2 servings per day of animal meat, plant-based meat alternatives, and whole-food plant proteins.
- Participants will have been consistent recreational runners or weightlifters (3-4 times per week) for at least the prior 1 year, and currently run or lift 3-4 times per week.
- Runners will engage in at least 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic activity or 75 minutes of vigorous activity per week. All participants will have habitually consumed an omnivorous diet for at least months.
- Participants will have self-reported good health and BMI 18.5-30.0.
- Participants must be able to commit to running or resistance training at least 3-4 times per week for the 12 week duration of the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals who have participated in any restrictive diet within the last month, have any known nutrient intolerances, have orthopedic limitations, are participating in any other physical activity or diet study;
- Individuals consuming any performance enhancing drugs or medications known to interfere with athletic performance;
- Individuals who have a chronic disease or eating disorder, are currently pregnant or intend to become pregnant in the next three months, or have an intent to compete in any physical activity competition within the next 3 months.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Whole Food Plant-Based (WFPB)
2 meals/day of traditional plant proteins (tofu, quinoa, black beans) and minimized intake of processed food, eggs, and dairy
|
Participants followed the WFPB, PBMA, and Animal diets (in this order) for 4 weeks each.
Participants followed the WFPB, Animal, and PBMA diets (in this order) for 4 weeks each.
Participants followed the PBMA, WFPB, and Animal diets (in this order) for 4 weeks each.
Participants followed the PBMA, Animal, and WFPB diets (in this order) for 4 weeks each.
Participants followed the Animal, WFPB, and PBMA diets (in this order) for 4 weeks each.
Participants followed the Animal, PBMA, and WFPB diets (in this order) for 4 weeks each.
|
|
Experimental: Plant-Based Meat Alternatives (PBMA)
2 servings/day of plant-based meat alternatives (Beyond Beef, Impossible Burger, Gardein Chick'n)
|
Participants followed the WFPB, PBMA, and Animal diets (in this order) for 4 weeks each.
Participants followed the WFPB, Animal, and PBMA diets (in this order) for 4 weeks each.
Participants followed the PBMA, WFPB, and Animal diets (in this order) for 4 weeks each.
Participants followed the PBMA, Animal, and WFPB diets (in this order) for 4 weeks each.
Participants followed the Animal, WFPB, and PBMA diets (in this order) for 4 weeks each.
Participants followed the Animal, PBMA, and WFPB diets (in this order) for 4 weeks each.
|
|
Experimental: Animal
2 servings/day of traditional meat products (beef burger, pork, chicken)
|
Participants followed the WFPB, PBMA, and Animal diets (in this order) for 4 weeks each.
Participants followed the WFPB, Animal, and PBMA diets (in this order) for 4 weeks each.
Participants followed the PBMA, WFPB, and Animal diets (in this order) for 4 weeks each.
Participants followed the PBMA, Animal, and WFPB diets (in this order) for 4 weeks each.
Participants followed the Animal, WFPB, and PBMA diets (in this order) for 4 weeks each.
Participants followed the Animal, PBMA, and WFPB diets (in this order) for 4 weeks each.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cooper 12-Minute Timed Run Test (Runners)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
|
Change from baseline in distance covered on a 12-minute timed run after each diet phase
|
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
|
|
Composite Machine Strength Index (Resistance Trainers)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
|
Change from baseline in composite machine strength index (sum of 3-rep max chest press, leg press, and lat pull-down) after each diet phase
|
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Estimated VO2 max (Runners)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
|
Change in VO2 max, estimated from training data compiled by Garmin Forerunner 235 after each diet phase
|
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
|
|
Maximum push-up and pull-up test
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
|
Change from baseline in maximum number of repetitions completed of push-up and pull-ups prior to exhaustion after each diet phase
|
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
|
|
Dietary intake and adherence
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
|
a. Nutrient composition of each diet and adherence to diet in servings of protein source consumed per week, via weekly dietary logs
|
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
|
|
Diet satisfaction
Time Frame: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
|
Score on Food Acceptability Questionnaire, measuring taste, appeal, and overall diet satisfaction, after each diet.
We used the "Food Acceptability Questionnaire", with a minimum value of 1 and a maximum value of 7. A higher score indicates better food acceptability.
|
Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 59905
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.