The Treatment Efficacy of Prolotherapy in Bladder Voiding Dysfunction
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Jing-dung Shen, MD
- Phone Number: +886958878129
- Email: jdwhydo@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Other (Non US)
-
Taichung, Other (Non US), Taiwan, 41168
- Recruiting
- Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital
-
Contact:
- Jing-dung Shen, MD
- Phone Number: +886958878129
- Email: jdwhydo@gmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Jing-dung Shen, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults over 20 years-old.
- The patient who meets the diagnostic criteria of overactive bladder or underactive bladder.
- The patient who capable to complete 3-days voiding diary and the questionnaire.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe stress urinary incontinence or severe pelvic organ prolapse.
- Acute urinary tract infection.
- Active hematuria, urolithiasis, or neoplasm of urinary tract.
- Acute skin lesion over the ankle injection site or the patient who could not tolerate ankle injection.
- Pregnant women.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: overactive bladder
Overactive bladder
|
5% glucose 10ml local injection peripheral to posterior tibial nerve near ankle under ultrasound guidance once a week for 4 weeks.
|
|
Experimental: Underactive bladder
|
5% glucose 10ml local injection peripheral to posterior tibial nerve near ankle under ultrasound guidance once a week for 4 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overactive Bladder Symptom Score
Time Frame: Week 0
|
The improvement of overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), OABSS ranged from 0 to 15, the higher score means more severity of overactive bladder.
|
Week 0
|
|
Overactive Bladder Symptom Score
Time Frame: Week1
|
The improvement of overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), OABSS ranged from 0 to 15, the higher score means more severity of overactive bladder.
|
Week1
|
|
Overactive Bladder Symptom Score
Time Frame: Week2
|
The improvement of overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), OABSS ranged from 0 to 15, the higher score means more severity of overactive bladder.
|
Week2
|
|
Overactive Bladder Symptom Score
Time Frame: Week3
|
The improvement of overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), OABSS ranged from 0 to 15, the higher score means more severity of overactive bladder.
|
Week3
|
|
Overactive Bladder Symptom Score
Time Frame: Week4
|
The improvement of overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), OABSS ranged from 0 to 15, the higher score means more severity of overactive bladder.
|
Week4
|
|
Overactive Bladder Symptom Score
Time Frame: Week8
|
The improvement of overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), OABSS ranged from 0 to 15, the higher score means more severity of overactive bladder.
|
Week8
|
|
Overactive Bladder Symptom Score
Time Frame: Week12
|
The improvement of overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), OABSS ranged from 0 to 15, the higher score means more severity of overactive bladder.
|
Week12
|
|
Overactive Bladder Symptom Score
Time Frame: Week16
|
The improvement of overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), OABSS ranged from 0 to 15, the higher score means more severity of overactive bladder.
|
Week16
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cystometric bladder capacity
Time Frame: Week0
|
Cystometric bladder capacity: the volume of water instilled into bladder while performing cystometry examination.
|
Week0
|
|
Cystometric bladder capacity
Time Frame: Week4
|
Cystometric bladder capacity: the volume of water instilled into bladder while performing cystometry examination.
|
Week4
|
|
Cystometric bladder capacity
Time Frame: Week16
|
Cystometric bladder capacity: the volume of water instilled into bladder while performing cystometry examination.
|
Week16
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The improvement of Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
Time Frame: Week 0
|
The PPBC measures the patients' perception of their urinary (bladder) problems.
Ranged from 1 to 6.
The core 1 means no bother from bladder condition, higher score means more bother form bladder condition.
|
Week 0
|
|
The improvement of Patient Perception of Bladder Condition
Time Frame: Week1
|
The PPBC measures the patients' perception of their urinary (bladder) problems.
Ranged from 1 to 6.
The core 1 means no bother from bladder condition, higher score means more bother form bladder condition.
|
Week1
|
|
The improvement of Patient Perception of Bladder Condition
Time Frame: Week2
|
The PPBC measures the patients' perception of their urinary (bladder) problems.
Ranged from 1 to 6.
The core 1 means no bother from bladder condition, higher score means more bother form bladder condition.
|
Week2
|
|
The improvement of Patient Perception of Bladder Condition
Time Frame: Week3
|
The PPBC measures the patients' perception of their urinary (bladder) problems.
Ranged from 1 to 6.
The core 1 means no bother from bladder condition, higher score means more bother form bladder condition.
|
Week3
|
|
The improvement of Patient Perception of Bladder Condition
Time Frame: Week4
|
The PPBC measures the patients' perception of their urinary (bladder) problems.
Ranged from 1 to 6.
The core 1 means no bother from bladder condition, higher score means more bother form bladder condition.
|
Week4
|
|
The improvement of Patient Perception of Bladder Condition
Time Frame: Week8
|
The PPBC measures the patients' perception of their urinary (bladder) problems.
|
Week8
|
|
The improvement of Patient Perception of Bladder Condition
Time Frame: Week12
|
The PPBC measures the patients' perception of their urinary (bladder) problems.
Ranged from 1 to 6.
The core 1 means no bother from bladder condition, higher score means more bother form bladder condition.
|
Week12
|
|
The improvement of Patient Perception of Bladder Condition
Time Frame: Week16
|
The PPBC measures the patients' perception of their urinary (bladder) problems.
Range from 1 to 6.
The core 1 means no bother from bladder condition, higher score means more bother form bladder condition.
|
Week16
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jing-dung Shen, Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Gormley EA, Lightner DJ, Faraday M, Vasavada SP; American Urological Association; Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline amendment. J Urol. 2015 May;193(5):1572-80. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.087. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
- Wu YT, Ho TY, Chou YC, Ke MJ, Li TY, Tsai CK, Chen LC. Six-month Efficacy of Perineural Dextrose for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Aug;92(8):1179-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.05.025.
- Tsui BCH, Kropelin B. The electrophysiological effect of dextrose 5% in water on single-shot peripheral nerve stimulation. Anesth Analg. 2005 Jun;100(6):1837-1839. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000153020.84780.A5.
- Fowler CJ, Griffiths D, de Groat WC. The neural control of micturition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jun;9(6):453-66. doi: 10.1038/nrn2401.
- Kaptchuk TJ. Acupuncture: theory, efficacy, and practice. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Mar 5;136(5):374-83. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-5-200203050-00010.
- Abraham TS, Chen ML, Ma SX. TRPV1 expression in acupuncture points: response to electroacupuncture stimulation. J Chem Neuroanat. 2011 Apr;41(3):129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
- Chen HC, Chen MY, Hsieh CL, Wu SY, Hsu HC, Lin YW. TRPV1 is a Responding Channel for Acupuncture Manipulation in Mice Peripheral and Central Nerve System. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;49(5):1813-1824. doi: 10.1159/000493627. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
- Zhang T, Yu J, Huang Z, Wang G, Zhang R. Electroacupuncture improves neurogenic bladder dysfunction through activation of NGF/TrkA signaling in a rat model. J Cell Biochem. 2019 Jun;120(6):9900-9905. doi: 10.1002/jcb.28272. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
- Zhao Y, Zhou J, Mo Q, Wang Y, Yu J, Liu Z. Acupuncture for adults with overactive bladder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(8):e9838. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009838.
- MacDiarmid SA, Peters KM, Shobeiri SA, Wooldridge LS, Rovner ES, Leong FC, Siegel SW, Tate SB, Feagins BA. Long-term durability of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of overactive bladder. J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.160.
- Sakura S, Chan VW, Ciriales R, Drasner K. The addition of 7.5% glucose does not alter the neurotoxicity of 5% lidocaine administered intrathecally in the rat. Anesthesiology. 1995 Jan;82(1):236-40. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199501000-00028.
- Tsui BC, Kropelin B, Ganapathy S, Finucane B. Dextrose 5% in water: fluid medium for maintaining electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves during stimulating catheter placement. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Nov;49(10):1562-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00736.x.
- Peters KM, Carrico DJ, Perez-Marrero RA, Khan AU, Wooldridge LS, Davis GL, Macdiarmid SA. Randomized trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus Sham efficacy in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome: results from the SUmiT trial. J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.036. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 108B01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.