Prognostic Value of Body Composition in Lung Cancer

August 21, 2022 updated by: Marmara University

Prognostic Value of Body Composition in Therapy-Naïve Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The effect of body composition on the survival rate is one of the research topics of interest in cancer patients and gaining attention in the last years. Body mass index is often used a proxy measure of total adiposity and previous studies examining the relationship between BMI and cancer outcomes have been showed distinct results . Obese patients with malignancies such as colorectal, breast, and pancreatic cancers, have been shown to have a worse prognosis than normal-weight patients . Nevertheless, obese patients with non small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) have been observed to have a better clinical outcome than normal/low-weight cancer patients . In this study, we examined the effects of subcutaneous adipose tissue, visceral adipose tissue and skeletal muscle volumes on survival in metastatic NSCLC patients under different treatment regimens. Since there is no standard method for adipose tissue measurement, we evaluated the abdominal cavity with multi-slice and single-slice computed tomography measurements.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
83

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • İstanbul, Turkey, 34870
        • Tuğba Kıratlı Yolcu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Eighty-three patients with stage-IV NSCLC who received at least one cycle of platinum based chemotherapy (PBCT) or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy and who underwent pre treatment FDG PET/CT from June 2012 to February 2019

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Having a pathological diagnosis of non small cell lung cancer
  2. Having a stage-IV disease
  3. To have received at least one course of treatment
  4. Presence of positron emission tomography /computed tomography (PET/CT) examination before treatment and having it taken in our hospital
  5. The data about the study can be accessed in our center.
  6. To be over 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to access patients data
  2. PET/CT CDs cannot be accessed or are not suitable for evaluation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Stage-IV non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Eighty-three patients with stage-IV NSCLC who received at least one cycle of platinum based chemotherapy (PBCT) or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy and who underwent pre treatment fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) /computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) from June 2012 to February 2019
Other: measured of body composition with computed tomography
Multislice and single-slice computed tomography images were used for assessment of body composition including visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), skeletal muscle mass volume (SMMV)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the impact of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) on the prognosis of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) area was measured by using computed tomography (CT). The entire abdominopelvic region from the "diaphragm dome" to the "symphysis pubis" level was determined as the study area. The volume was recorded as cm3. Index values were calculated by proportioning VAT to body surface area (BSA) and median index value was determined. The survival rates of patients with an index value greater and less than the mean index value were compared.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
To evaluate the impact of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) on the prognosis of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) area was measured by using computed tomography (CT). The entire abdominopelvic region from the "diaphragm dome" to the "symphysis pubis" level was determined as the study area. The volume was recorded as cm3. Index values were calculated by proportioning SAT to body surface area (BSA) and median index value was determined. The survival rates of patients with an index value greater and less than the mean index value were compared.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
To evaluate the impact of skeletal muscle mass volume (SMMV) on the prognosis of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Skeletal muscle mass volume (SMMV) area was measured by using computed tomography (CT). For SMMV calculation, paraspinal muscle tissue located between L2-L5 lumbar vertebrae levels was determined . The volume was recorded as cm3. Index values were calculated by proportioning SMMV to body surface area (BSA) and median index value was determined. The survival rates of patients with an index value greater and less than the mean index value were compared.
through study completion, an average of 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Marmara University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 21, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 09.2019.1026

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings