Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Molecular Tests for Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis Using Saliva Samples

September 2, 2025 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Creteil

Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Molecular Tests for Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis Using Saliva Samples: Prospective Multicenter Study in Primary Care

Observational study evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of rapid point-of-care molecular Group A strep diagnostic tests in saliva as compared to standard culture- and PCR-based techniques for the management of children aged 3-15 years of age presenting with sore throat to primary care.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Group A streptococcus (GAS) is found in 20% to 40% of cases of childhood pharyngitis; the remaining cases are viral. Streptococcal pharyngitis ('strep throat') deserves antibiotics, while these are not indicated in viral cases. Because signs and symptoms of streptococcal and viral cases overlap, most guidelines recommend relying on a diagnostic test to identify Group A streptococcus to select who should receive antibiotics. In most settings, the first-line test to detect Group A Streptococcus is a rapid antigen detection test based on a throat swab, and the reference standard to identify streptococcal cases is throat culture. Recently, new rapid tests were developed. They use molecular techniques, such as rapid PCRs or LAMP, based on throat swabs. We hypothesize that these new molecular tests are sensitive enough to be performed on saliva swabs instead of throat swabs. Collecting saliva is less invasive and could be done by personnel with limited training.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
800

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • France
      • Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, France
        • ACTIV

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Children (3 to 15 years) with acute pharyngitis in primary care

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • children 3-15 years
  • seen in primary care (general practitioner or primary care pediatrician)
  • with a diagnosis of acute pharyngitis defined as an inflammation of the pharynx and/or tonsils (erythema with or without exudate) or acute sore throat (even if without local signs of pharyngeal inflammation)
  • non-opposition of the accompanying parent(s)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • children who received antibiotics within 7 days before inclusion
  • children already enrolled in the study for the same episode of pharyngitis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Index test : Abbott ID NOW STREP A 2
Diagnostic test: Index test: Abbott ID NOW STREP A 2
The test under evaluation ('index test') is the rapid molecular test for Group A streptococcus Abbott ID NOW STREP A 2 (performed on saliva samples instead of throat swabs). This test was chosen because of its ease of use and several previous evaluations showing high diagnostic accuracy on throat swabs. The test gives a result after 2 to 6 minutes and will be performed by primary care practitioners participating in the study, in their office, using salivary swabs instead of throat swabs. Investigators will receive one session of specific training prior to the study. Saliva samples will be collected using the cotton swab that comes within the test packages. Index test results will not be used for patient management. Clinicians performing the rapid saliva test will not be blinded to clinical information.
Reference standard test : Composite of culture and PCR-based tests based on a throat swab
Diagnostic test: Reference standard test: Composite of culture and PCR-based tests based on a throat swab

Throat samples will be obtained by use of a double-swab collection-transportation system :

  • Swab #1 will be used to perform the rapid antigen detection test (see below)
  • Swab #2 will be held at ambient temperature and sent within 72 hours to Robert Debre Hospital microbiology laboratory. Throat swabs will be used to perform throat cultures using standard techniques (PMID: 22768060). Throat swabs will also be used to perform a PCR specific for Group A streptococcus (PMID: 23465407). Samples with a positive culture and/or a positive PCR test result will be classified as reference-standard-positives. Samples with a negative culture and a negative PCR will be classified as reference-standard-negatives. Investigators will be blinded to clinical data, including the result of the rapid antigen detection test and the rapid saliva test.
Comparator test : Rapid antigen detection test (usual care)
Diagnostic test: Comparator test: Rapid antigen detection test (usual care)
As per usual care, all children will undergo a rapid antigen detection test (StreptAtest, Biosynex), using Swab#1 (see above). This rapid antigen detection test is the one used in France and is the only commercial kit that is officially recommended by the National Health Insurance system. It detects Lancefield's Group A antigen, which is specific to Group A Streptococcus. The test will be performed by investigators, during consultation time. Clinicians performing the rapid antigen detection test will not be blinded to clinical information.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Sensitivity of the Abbott ID NOW STREP A 2 rapid molecular test on saliva samples.
Time Frame: Immediatly after the test
Immediatly after the test

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Difference in sensitivity between the rapid molecular tests on saliva and the classical rapid antigen detection tests on throat swabs
Time Frame: Immediatly after the test
Immediatly after the test

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Variability in sensitivity and specificity of rapid molecular tests on saliva according to the McIsaac score (modified Centor score)
Time Frame: Immediatly after the test
Immediatly after the test
Time needed to perform the rapid molecular test on saliva and obtain the results
Time Frame: Immediatly after the test
Immediatly after the test
Satisfaction of the physician, the child, and the accompanying parent(s) withe a questionnaire
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1,5 year
Through study completion, an average of 1,5 year
Main reasons for not performing rapid tests among primary care practitioners
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1,5 year
Through study completion, an average of 1,5 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Creteil

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University Hospital, Paris
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades
Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon
Association Clinique Thérapeutique Infantile du val de Marne

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 31, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 31, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 28, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 30, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 2, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PREDISTREP IX

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings