Prognostic Analysis of Different Treatment Options for Cerebral Hemorrhage

March 16, 2026 updated by: Zhaoxu，MD, The Affiliated Hospital Of Guizhou Medical University

Analysis of Related Factors of Hematoma Morphology in Patients With Cerebral Hemorrhage and Prognosis Analysis of Different Regimens for Cerebral Hemorrhage

To analyze the influence of early hematoma morphology on hematoma expansion, optimize the treatment plan for cerebral hemorrhage, and guide the treatment of patients with cerebral hemorrhage in combination with clinical practice.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Intracerebral hemorrhage refers to the hemorrhage caused by the rupture of blood vessels in the non-traumatic brain parenchyma, accounting for 20% to 30% of all strokes, with an acute mortality rate of 30% to 40%. Different degrees of movement disorders, language disorders, etc. will be left behind. It is of great clinical significance to deeply explore the relevant factors and effective treatment plans for the evolution of cerebral hemorrhage. 30% of hematomas can still have active bleeding within 20 hours of onset. The INTERACT test defines hematoma expansion as 24-48 hours of repeated non-enhanced CT. The increase in hematoma volume >12.5ml or 33% of the original volume is the cause of neurological deterioration and abnormality. An important cause of poor prognosis, studies have confirmed that irregular hematoma morphology is a strong predictor of hematoma expansion. Treatment of cerebral hemorrhage currently includes medical treatment and surgical treatment. Surgical treatment has become an important method for the treatment of ICH due to its advantages of rapid removal of hematoma, relief of high intracranial pressure, and release of mechanical compression. However, whether surgery can reduce the mortality of patients with cerebral hemorrhage and improve neurological damage is still controversial. Surgical operations include dstereotactic intracranial hematoma puncture and drainage, decompressive craniectomy , neuroendoscopic. Currently, there are large randomized controlled trials at home and abroad on minimally invasive hematoma evacuation. The treatment of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage is safe, but the effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery is unclear due to inconsistent bleeding volume, surgical trauma, and hematoma morphology.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Wu guofeng, Doctor
  • Phone Number: 13809431723

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guizhou
      • Guiyang, Guizhou, China
        • Recruiting
        • Guizhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Wu guofeng, Doctor
          • Phone Number: 13809431723

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The inpatients admitted to the Emergency Neurology Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from January 1, 2014 to August 31, 2022 were collected. According to the head CT at the time of admission, they were divided into the hematoma rule group and the hematoma irregular group

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18-80 years old;
  2. Intracerebral hemorrhage was diagnosed by head CT examination;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Multiple intracranial hemorrhage;
  2. Intracranial hemorrhage caused by intracranial tumor, aneurysm, trauma, infarction or other lesions;
  3. Coagulation disorders or a history of taking anticoagulants;
  4. Infectious meningitis, systemic infection;
  5. History of severe stroke, heart, kidney, liver and lung dysfunction in the past;
  6. Severe brain herniation (mydriasis, respiratory and circulatory failure);
  7. Incomplete or missing basic data or follow-up information in the hospital.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Stereotactic intracranial hematoma puncture treatment group
Check the CT slice of the patient's brain, find out the patient's largest hematoma level, measure the coordinates of the puncture center, locate and mark the skull surface according to the measured coordinates, select the puncture point under the stereotaxic instrument, Mainly avoid important blood vessels, nerves and functional areas. Use an electric drill to drill the puncture needle into the center of the hematoma, and slowly aspirate the hematoma from the side hole until the suction stops when there is resistance. The residual hematoma in CT and the location of the drainage tube were determined, and the position of the puncture needle was adjusted for the situation of brain CT. After the operation, according to the re-examination of cranial CT, urokinase was injected into the hematoma cavity through the drainage tube to dissolve the residual hematoma, and the operation process strictly followed aseptic operation.
Procedure: Stereotactic intracranial hematoma puncture
Check the CT scan of the patient's brain, find out the largest hematoma level of the patient, measure the coordinates of the puncture center, locate and mark the skull surface according to the coordinates obtained from the measurement, select the puncture point under the stereotaxic instrument, and mainly avoid important blood vessels , nerves and functional areas. Use an electric drill to drill the puncture needle into the center of the hematoma, and slowly aspirate the hematoma from the side hole until the suction stops when there is resistance. The residual hematoma in CT and the location of the drainage tube were determined, and the position of the puncture needle was adjusted for the situation of brain CT. After the operation, according to the re-examination of cranial CT, urokinase was injected into the hematoma cavity through the drainage tube to dissolve the residual hematoma, and the operation process strictly followed aseptic operation.
drug treatment group
General treatment: Based on high-level nursing care and close and continuous attention to the patient's vital signs, the patient is instructed to stay in bed continuously, give oxygen, and instruct the patient to avoid emotional agitation, etc. ②Special treatment: use hemostatic drugs, control blood pressure to prevent rebleeding, control blood sugar, control body temperature, anti-epilepsy, prevent infection, dehydration and lower intracranial pressure, etc. Multisystem complications such as tract hemorrhage should be actively managed.
decompressive craniectomy treatment group
Prior to the procedure, all patients obtained endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia following the informed consent provided by their family members. Upon identifying the hematoma's location through CT imaging, the surgeon made a linear or horseshoe-shaped incision on the scalp and subsequently opened the dura mater after creating a bone flap. The hematoma was punctured using a brain needle, allowing for effective decompression. The cerebral cortex was incised along the cerebral gyri, facilitating the separation of brain tissue to eliminate residual hematoma. Once hemostasis was ensured within the operative area, a silicone drainage tube was inserted, and the cranial bone flap was restored to its original position. In cases of severe brain edema or cerebral herniation, bone flap decompression was performed.
Procedure: decompressive craniectomy
Prior to the procedure, all patients obtained endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia following the informed consent provided by their family members. Upon identifying the hematoma's location through CT imaging, the surgeon made a linear or horseshoe-shaped incision on the scalp and subsequently opened the dura mater after creating a bone flap. The hematoma was punctured using a brain needle, allowing for effective decompression. The cerebral cortex was incised along the cerebral gyri, facilitating the separation of brain tissue to eliminate residual hematoma. Once hemostasis was ensured within the operative area, a silicone drainage tube was inserted, and the cranial bone flap was restored to its original position. In cases of severe brain edema or cerebral herniation, bone flap decompression was performed.
Neuroendoscopic treatment group
The patient's preoperative CT and MR imaging data were fused with a neuronavigation system to avoid important functional areas and select the closest point of the hematoma to the cortex as the location point. Routine craniotomy was performed with a 2*3 cm bone window, the puncture direction was repositioned by neuronavigation, the sheath was placed at the center of the hematoma, the core was removed, the endoscope was gradually aspirated, and the bleeding was stopped with electrocoagulation if there was considerable active bleeding. A drainage tube was placed, the bone flap was reset after surgery, and the scalp was sutured.
Procedure: Neuroendoscopic
The patient's preoperative CT and MR imaging data were fused with a neuronavigation system to avoid important functional areas and select the closest point of the hematoma to the cortex as the location point. Routine craniotomy was performed with a 2*3 cm bone window, the puncture direction was repositioned by neuronavigation, the sheath was placed at the center of the hematoma, the core was removed, the endoscope was gradually aspirated, and the bleeding was stopped with electrocoagulation if there was considerable active bleeding. A drainage tube was placed, the bone flap was reset after surgery, and the scalp was sutured.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hematoma expansion rate 24 hours after onset
Time Frame: 24 hours of onset
The number of cases with enlarged hematoma after re-examination of head CT after 24 hours
24 hours of onset
90-day Modified Rankin Rating Scale score;
Time Frame: 90-day
Modified Rankin Rating Scale score at 90 days after discharge，0-3 indicates good prognosis, 4-6 indicates poor prognosis, and 6 indicates death.
90-day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
90-day mortality
Time Frame: 90-day
Proportion of patients who died 90 days after discharge
90-day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The Affiliated Hospital Of Guizhou Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 25, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 31, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 19, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 16, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • JZSJK0828

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings