CardioInsight 3 - LBBB (CardioInsight3)

February 15, 2024 updated by: Professor Bryan Ping Yen YAN, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Activation Pattern and Acute Hemodynamics of His and Left Bundle Pacing

Background Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is proven to improve survival and heart function of patient with certain electrical conduction abnormality and heart failure. However, in patient with certain electrical conduction abnormality, being nonresponder is observed in up to 40% in patient receiving CRT. Conventionally the surgical approach of CRT is to implant one pacing lead in the right heart and one in the left heart to resynchronize the contraction and the pacing lead in the left heart is usually placed in the posterior or lateral portion of the left heart. However, this single approach may not be optimal, especially for those patients with conduction abnormality known to have no response to CRT. Purpose of the clinical investigation The purpose of the Activation Pattern and Acute Hemodynamics of His and Left Bundle Pacing is to study the acute effect on the heart function and conduction abnormality of His and left bundle pacing in conventional CRT candidate. During CRT implantation, Hisbundle lead and Left bundle pacing lead will be placed and the acute effect on heart function will be studied by a wire placed in the left ventricle of the heart and the activation pattern will be studied by a noninvasive global mapping system. The pacing approach that optimally corrects conduction abnormality and improvement on the heart function acutely will be determined

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
27

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Hong Kong
      • Shatin, Hong Kong, 999077
        • Recruiting
        • The Chinese University of Hong Kong
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (aged 18 or above) of both sexes
  • Candidate for CRT therapy according to international guidelines.7
  • Informed consent by the patient
  • Already received stable dose of guideline directed medical therapy for at least 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant
  • Participating in another study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Tailor-made CRT delivery
Cardiac resynchronization therapy given according to Electrical Activation Mapping result
Device: Electrical Activation Mapping Guided Cardiac resynchronization therapy
To study the feasibility to optimize configuration of CRT delivery for acute correction of electrical dyssynchrony using a noninvasive mapping of global electrical activation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in myocardiac activation
Time Frame: 6 months
Correction of activation abnormality as evaluated by global noninvasive mapping system (ECGi) seen as an increase in acute dp/dt > 5% from baseline with left bundle pacing comparing to biventricular pacing.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Echocardiogram parameters: left ventricular ejection fraction
Time Frame: 6 months
Echocardiogram parameters: left ventricular ejection fraction at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
6 months
Echocardiogram parameters: strain imaging
Time Frame: 6 months
Echocardiogram parameters: strain imaging at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
6 months
Procedure duration
Time Frame: during procedure
Procedure duration of the optimal CRT delivery method as determined by the best improvement in electrical desynchrony indices.
during procedure
Implantation success rate
Time Frame: during procedure
Implantation success rate of the optimal CRT delivery method as determined by the best improvement in electrical desynchrony indices.
during procedure
Cine images and chest X ray
Time Frame: 6 months
Cine images (PA, LAO 300, RAO 300) and Chest X ray (PA view) obtained during course of study for assessment of disease
6 months
Echocardiogram parameters: left ventricular systolic and diastolic volume
Time Frame: 6 months
Echocardiogram parameters: left ventricular systolic and diastolic volume at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
6 months
Echocardiogram parameters: degree of mitral regurgitation
Time Frame: 6 months
Echocardiogram parameters at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
6 months
Change in New York Heart Association class
Time Frame: 6 months
Comparison of NYHA class at baseline, 3 months and 6 months to assess changes in quality of life of subject.
6 months
Device parameter: defibrillation threshold
Time Frame: 6 months
Electrical parameters including defibrillation threshold at implant and 6 months follow-up.
6 months
post-operative complication rate
Time Frame: 6 months

Peri-operative and 6 months follow-up complications rate:

  1. Thromboembolic event
  2. Dislodgement and migration of pacing leads
  3. Phrenic nerve stimulation
  4. Others
6 months
Device parameter: defibrillation sensitivity
Time Frame: 6 months
Electrical parameters including defibrillation sensitivity at implant and 6 months follow-up.
6 months
Device parameter: lead impedance
Time Frame: 6 months
Electrical parameters including lead impedance of pacing leads at addition of new lead and 6 months follow-up.
6 months
Change in 6 minute hall walk test result
Time Frame: 6 months
Comparison of 6 minute hall walk test result at baseline, 3 months and 6 months to assess changes in quality of life of subject.
6 months
Change in HF Patient Global Assessment Questionnaire outcome
Time Frame: 6 months
Comparison of HF Patient Global Assessment Questionnaire outcome at baseline, 3 months and 6 months to assess changes in quality of life of subject.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chinese University of Hong Kong

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Bryan Yan, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 5, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 22, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 15, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2019.021-T

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings