CardioInsight 3 - LBBB (CardioInsight3)

February 15, 2024 updated by: Professor Bryan Ping Yen YAN, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Activation Pattern and Acute Hemodynamics of His and Left Bundle Pacing

Background Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is proven to improve survival and heart function of patient with certain electrical conduction abnormality and heart failure. However, in patient with certain electrical conduction abnormality, being nonresponder is observed in up to 40% in patient receiving CRT. Conventionally the surgical approach of CRT is to implant one pacing lead in the right heart and one in the left heart to resynchronize the contraction and the pacing lead in the left heart is usually placed in the posterior or lateral portion of the left heart. However, this single approach may not be optimal, especially for those patients with conduction abnormality known to have no response to CRT. Purpose of the clinical investigation The purpose of the Activation Pattern and Acute Hemodynamics of His and Left Bundle Pacing is to study the acute effect on the heart function and conduction abnormality of His and left bundle pacing in conventional CRT candidate. During CRT implantation, Hisbundle lead and Left bundle pacing lead will be placed and the acute effect on heart function will be studied by a wire placed in the left ventricle of the heart and the activation pattern will be studied by a noninvasive global mapping system. The pacing approach that optimally corrects conduction abnormality and improvement on the heart function acutely will be determined

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

27

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Shatin, Hong Kong, 999077
        • Recruiting
        • The Chinese University of Hong Kong
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (aged 18 or above) of both sexes
  • Candidate for CRT therapy according to international guidelines.7
  • Informed consent by the patient
  • Already received stable dose of guideline directed medical therapy for at least 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant
  • Participating in another study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tailor-made CRT delivery
Cardiac resynchronization therapy given according to Electrical Activation Mapping result
To study the feasibility to optimize configuration of CRT delivery for acute correction of electrical dyssynchrony using a noninvasive mapping of global electrical activation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in myocardiac activation
Time Frame: 6 months
Correction of activation abnormality as evaluated by global noninvasive mapping system (ECGi) seen as an increase in acute dp/dt > 5% from baseline with left bundle pacing comparing to biventricular pacing.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Echocardiogram parameters: left ventricular ejection fraction
Time Frame: 6 months
Echocardiogram parameters: left ventricular ejection fraction at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
6 months
Echocardiogram parameters: strain imaging
Time Frame: 6 months
Echocardiogram parameters: strain imaging at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
6 months
Procedure duration
Time Frame: during procedure
Procedure duration of the optimal CRT delivery method as determined by the best improvement in electrical desynchrony indices.
during procedure
Implantation success rate
Time Frame: during procedure
Implantation success rate of the optimal CRT delivery method as determined by the best improvement in electrical desynchrony indices.
during procedure
Cine images and chest X ray
Time Frame: 6 months
Cine images (PA, LAO 300, RAO 300) and Chest X ray (PA view) obtained during course of study for assessment of disease
6 months
Echocardiogram parameters: left ventricular systolic and diastolic volume
Time Frame: 6 months
Echocardiogram parameters: left ventricular systolic and diastolic volume at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
6 months
Echocardiogram parameters: degree of mitral regurgitation
Time Frame: 6 months
Echocardiogram parameters at baseline, 3 months and 6 months
6 months
Change in New York Heart Association class
Time Frame: 6 months
Comparison of NYHA class at baseline, 3 months and 6 months to assess changes in quality of life of subject.
6 months
Device parameter: defibrillation threshold
Time Frame: 6 months
Electrical parameters including defibrillation threshold at implant and 6 months follow-up.
6 months
post-operative complication rate
Time Frame: 6 months

Peri-operative and 6 months follow-up complications rate:

  1. Thromboembolic event
  2. Dislodgement and migration of pacing leads
  3. Phrenic nerve stimulation
  4. Others
6 months
Device parameter: defibrillation sensitivity
Time Frame: 6 months
Electrical parameters including defibrillation sensitivity at implant and 6 months follow-up.
6 months
Device parameter: lead impedance
Time Frame: 6 months
Electrical parameters including lead impedance of pacing leads at addition of new lead and 6 months follow-up.
6 months
Change in 6 minute hall walk test result
Time Frame: 6 months
Comparison of 6 minute hall walk test result at baseline, 3 months and 6 months to assess changes in quality of life of subject.
6 months
Change in HF Patient Global Assessment Questionnaire outcome
Time Frame: 6 months
Comparison of HF Patient Global Assessment Questionnaire outcome at baseline, 3 months and 6 months to assess changes in quality of life of subject.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bryan Yan, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 5, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019.021-T

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Electrical Activation Mapping Guided Cardiac resynchronization therapy

Subscribe