Artificial Intelligence-assisted Evaluation of Pulmonary HYpertension (AIPHY)

April 6, 2025 updated by: Chinese Pulmonary Vascular Disease Research Group

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Evaluation of Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension represents a challenging and heterogeneous condition that is associated with high mortality and morbidity if left untreated. Artificial intelligence is used to study and develop theories and methods that simulate and extend human intelligence, which is being applied in fields related to cardiovascular diseases. The study intends to combine multimodal clinical data of patients who undergo right heart catheterization at Fuwai Hospital with artificial intelligence techniques to create programs that can screen and diagnose pulmonary hypertension.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) represent a challenging and heterogeneous cohort with high morbidity and mortality if left untreated. To make a definitive diagnosis of PH, one needs to conduct an invasive right heart catheterization (RHC) in order to assess the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP). As PH occurs sporadically in various medical conditions, including connective tissue disease, and congenital heart disease, and presenting symptoms are non-specific, there is a need to raise the suspicion of PH early in the community. For this reason, noninvasive tools that are widely available for upfront screening would be ideal to enable timely diagnosis of PH. Transthoracic echocardiography has emerged as the mainstay for screening of PH, yet the sensitivity and specificity of this approach remain limited even in experienced hands. As high-throughput technologies advance and access to PH big data improve, it will be critical to prudently select artificial intelligence approaches for data analysis, visualization, and interpretation. By combining the multimodal clinical data (such as indicators from chest X-ray, electrocardiography, and echocardiography), this study aims to develop artificial intelligence-assisted programs to assist the screening and diagnosis of PH, and to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy for PH as compared with RHC, and to estimate whether this approach outperforms the conventional echocardiographic method.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100037
        • Recruiting
        • Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients previously received chest X-rays, electrocardiography, echocardiography, other routine examinations, and RHC at the Fuwai Hospital, CAMS & PUMC, Beijing, China.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years old
  • Patients previously received chest X-ray, electrocardiography, echocardiography, other routine examinations, and RHC at the Fuwai Hospital, CAMS & PUMC, Beijing, China

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients without RHC
  • The quality of routine examinations and RHC cannot meet the requirement for further analysis
  • Severe loss of results of routine examinations (chest X-ray, electrocardiography, echocardiography, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Patients with pulmonary hypertension
A series of routine examinations, including chest X-ray, electrocardiography, echocardiography, etc, would be performed on consecutive patients at Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. An RHC with an mPAP of >20 mmHg would confirm the diagnosis of PH. All these data will be collected as a source for machine learning or other artificial intelligence-assisted programs.
Diagnostic test: Right heart catheterization
RHC is commonly used essential test to make gold-standard diagnosis of PH with mPAP >20 mmHg. All multimodal data from patients eligible for inclusion would be randomly assigned to development datasets (70% of the study population) to train the artificial intelligence models for the detection of PH, which would be validated and tested by other datasets (30% of the study population).
Patients without pulmonary hypertension
A series of routine examinations, including chest X-ray, electrocardiography, echocardiography, etc, would be performed on consecutive patients at Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. An RHC with an mPAP of ≤20 mmHg would confirm the absence of PH. All these data will be collected as a source for machine learning or other artificial intelligence-assisted programs.
Diagnostic test: Right heart catheterization
RHC is commonly used essential test to make gold-standard diagnosis of PH with mPAP >20 mmHg. All multimodal data from patients eligible for inclusion would be randomly assigned to development datasets (70% of the study population) to train the artificial intelligence models for the detection of PH, which would be validated and tested by other datasets (30% of the study population).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of diagnosis by artificial intelligence-assisted algorithm
Time Frame: Baseline
The investigators will calculate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of diagnosis by artificial intelligence-assisted algorithm and compare this index between artificial intelligence-assisted algorithm and RHC.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of diagnosis by artificial intelligence algorithm
Time Frame: Baseline
The investigators will calculate the sensitivity of diagnosis by artificial intelligence-assisted algorithm and compare this index between artificial intelligence-assisted algorithm and RHC.
Baseline
Specificity of diagnosis by artificial intelligence algorithm
Time Frame: Baseline
The investigators will calculate the sensitivity of diagnosis by artificial intelligence-assisted algorithm and compare this index between artificial intelligence-assisted algorithm and RHC.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chinese Pulmonary Vascular Disease Research Group

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Zhihong Liu, MD, PhD, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 6, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AIPHY Project

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings