A Pilot Study of a Blended Intervention Targeting Emotion Dysregulation in Adults with ADHD

March 12, 2025 updated by: University of Bergen
The current study aims to investigate the feasibility and preliminary clinical effects of a blended psychological intervention targeting emotion dysregulation in adults with ADHD.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Adults with ADHD with co-occurring deficits in emotion regulation are expected to have more severe impairment than those without such deficits in several life domains. Both pharmacological and psychological treatment interventions for adults with ADHD tend to target core symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity, and there are few available interventions targeting emotional symptoms. The current study aims to investigate the feasibility and preliminary clinical effects of a blended psychological intervention targeting emotion dysregulation in ADHD. The intervention consists of eight face-to-face group sessions and a companion app to be used by the participants between the sessions for skills training. The investigators seek to recruit between 15 to 20 adults with ADHD to participate in the pilot study. Feasibility outcomes include adherence, treatment satisfaction and treatment credibility. Self-report questionnaires assessing emotion dysregulation, ADHD symptoms, quality of life, anxiety and depression will be used to examine preliminary clinical effects. There will also be conducted qualitative process interviews to examine the participants expectations and experiences with the program. The investigators expect the intervention to be feasible and to find positive preliminary effects. The findings from the study will be of importance for to further improve the intervention for for a future randomized-controlled trial.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
16

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Norway
    • Vestland
      • Bergen, Vestland, Norway, 5019
        • University of Bergen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18 years old or older
  2. A diagnosis of ADHD
  3. Current problems with emotion regulation as indicated with a score above 80 on the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
  4. Access to a smartphone

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current self-reported diagnosis of severe psychiatric illness such as ongoing substance abuse or psychosis.
  2. High risk of suicidality, as indicated by a) has attempted suicide within the last year, b) has previously attempted suicide and reports suicidal ideation, or c) reports current ideations and has a plan or preferred method.
  3. Other ongoing psychological treatment for ADHD or other psychiatric illnesses.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Emotion regulation Intervention
An 8-week blended intervention targeting emotion dysregulation in ADHD
Behavioral: Emotion Regulation Intervention for ADHD
The intervention will be based on principles from dialectic behavioral therapy. The overall aim of the intervention is to improve emotion regulation skills. The intervention will consist of eight face-to-face group sessions and a digital companion app that the participants can use to practice skills between the sessions. The groups will include mindfulness-based exercises, homework review, introduction to new skills, and peer discussions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
The third item from the The Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) will be used to assess treatment credibility. The third item states "How confident would you be in recommending this treatment to a friend with similar challenges? The item is rated on a scale from 1 (none at all confident) to 9 (very confident)
Up to 12 weeks
Open questions on treatment satisfaction
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
At the post-intervention assessment, the participants will be asked whether they are likely to continue using the exercises from the intervention in the future and whether they have experienced any adverse events, where the participants will have the option to elaborate in an open text-field. There will also be conducted qualitative interviews with the participants to examine their experiences (positive and negative) with the program.
Up to 12 weeks
Treatment adherence
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Number of attended group sessions and number of completed homework assignments
Up to 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
The measure is a self-report questionnaire that is commonly used to assess emotion dysregulation in clinical populations. The scale includes 36 items rated on a 5-point scale ranging from "Never" (1) to "Almost always" (5), yielding a total score of between 36 - 180, where a higher score indicate a higher degree of emotion dysregulation.
Up to 12 weeks
The Adult ADHD Self-Rating Scale (ASRS)
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
The scale assesses symptoms of inattention (nine items), and symptoms of hyperactivity-impulsivity (nine items) and includes a total of 18 items. The response type consists of a 5-point scale with options "Never" (0), "Rarely" (1), "Sometimes" (2), "Often" (3) or "Very Often" (4) giving the scale a maximum score of 72 for full-scale ASRS and 36 on each of the two subscales of inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity. A higher score indicate a higher severity in symptoms.
Up to 12 weeks
The Adult ADHD Quality of Life Measure (AAQoL)
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
The measure assesses quality of life during the past two weeks and is specifically developed for adults with ADHD. The scale comprises 29 items rated on a scale from "Not at all/Never" (1) to "Extremely/Very Often" (5), yielding a total score between 0 - 100 points. The scale also included four subscales: life productivity, psychological health, life outlook, and relationships, all yielding a score between 0 - 100 points. A higher score indicates better quality of life.
Up to 12 weeks
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
The scale examine symptoms of depression and anxiety. The scale consists of 14 items with response options ranging from 0-3, with 3 being the most severe level of symptoms. The scale yields one total score, ranging from 0-42, and one subscale score from depression, and one subscale for anxiety, ranging from 0-21.
Up to 12 weeks
The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning Adult version (BRIEF-A)
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning Adult version (BRIEF-A) is a self-report questionnaire assessing executive functioning in everyday life. The scale consists of 75 items and are rates on a 3-point scale from "Never" (1) to "Often" (3).
Up to 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Bergen

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Haukeland University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Astri Lundervold, PhD, University of Bergen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 29, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 14, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 18, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 12, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 494659

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings