Population Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Carbapenems in Febrile Neutropenia Patients
Dose Optimization of Carbapenem Antibacterials in Febrile Neutropenia Patients Based on PPK/PD Model and MAPB Method and Research on Individualized Drug Use Software
- Evaluating the differences in the efficacy and safety of meropenem optimal dosing regimen predicted by the PPK/PD model combined with MAPB method for patients with malignant hematological myelopathy accompanied by fever, as compared with the current conventional treatment regimen;
- The visualization software of meropenem individualized medication was developed with the help of JAVA development language, J2EE framework and SQL Server database.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Mengying Liu
- Phone Number: 025-83106666
- Email: nobodyxyy@126.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years old, regardless of gender;
- Patients with malignant hematological diseases with neutropenia and fever are judged as high-risk patients according to the Guidelines for Clinical Application of Antibiotics in Patients with Neutropenia and Fever in China (2020 Edition);
- There is infection, and the results of drug sensitivity test show that pathogenic bacteria are sensitive to meropenem or meropenem is used according to experience;
- The blood concentration of meropenem has reached a steady state;
- Each patient's blood sample points ≥2, and cases with only one blood sample point can also be included in the database;
- Sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with non-malignant hematological diseases;
- Non-granular deficiency with fever;
- Those who did not reach steady state when receiving meropenem;
- There is a history of meropenem drug allergy;
- The patient lacks treatment compliance based on the patient's history and the judgment of the researcher;
- The patient has hemophagocytic syndrome;
- Patients undergoing renal replacement therapy;
- Patients with incomplete clinical evaluation data (such as lack of information on renal function and biochemical indicators, and inability to obtain blood samples);
- The sample contains components that interfere with the determination of drug concentration (such as valproic acid and chloramphenicol);
- Pregnant and lactating women;
- Cases considered by the researcher as unsuitable for inclusion.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: model intervention group
The model was used for prediction to guide the later dosing regimen
|
Dose prediction using population pharmacokinetic models.
|
|
No Intervention: Non-intervention group
In the non-intervention group, the doctor chose the treatment plan.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of antipyretic time 12 days after drug administration
Time Frame: Baseline and at the first 0 hour, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 96 hours, 120 hours, 144 hours, 168 hours, 192 hours, 216 hours, 240 hours, 264 hours, 288 hours after administration,
|
The antipyretic time of the experimental group is compared with that of the control group.
If the antipyretic time of the experimental group is shorter than that of the control group, the experimental treatment is considered effective.
|
Baseline and at the first 0 hour, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 96 hours, 120 hours, 144 hours, 168 hours, 192 hours, 216 hours, 240 hours, 264 hours, 288 hours after administration,
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Yudong Qiu, The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2022-LCYJ-PY-48
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.