Population Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Carbapenems in Febrile Neutropenia Patients

Dose Optimization of Carbapenem Antibacterials in Febrile Neutropenia Patients Based on PPK/PD Model and MAPB Method and Research on Individualized Drug Use Software

  1. Evaluating the differences in the efficacy and safety of meropenem optimal dosing regimen predicted by the PPK/PD model combined with MAPB method for patients with malignant hematological myelopathy accompanied by fever, as compared with the current conventional treatment regimen;
  2. The visualization software of meropenem individualized medication was developed with the help of JAVA development language, J2EE framework and SQL Server database.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 years old, regardless of gender;
  2. Patients with malignant hematological diseases with neutropenia and fever are judged as high-risk patients according to the Guidelines for Clinical Application of Antibiotics in Patients with Neutropenia and Fever in China (2020 Edition);
  3. There is infection, and the results of drug sensitivity test show that pathogenic bacteria are sensitive to meropenem or meropenem is used according to experience;
  4. The blood concentration of meropenem has reached a steady state;
  5. Each patient's blood sample points ≥2, and cases with only one blood sample point can also be included in the database;
  6. Sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with non-malignant hematological diseases;
  2. Non-granular deficiency with fever;
  3. Those who did not reach steady state when receiving meropenem;
  4. There is a history of meropenem drug allergy;
  5. The patient lacks treatment compliance based on the patient's history and the judgment of the researcher;
  6. The patient has hemophagocytic syndrome;
  7. Patients undergoing renal replacement therapy;
  8. Patients with incomplete clinical evaluation data (such as lack of information on renal function and biochemical indicators, and inability to obtain blood samples);
  9. The sample contains components that interfere with the determination of drug concentration (such as valproic acid and chloramphenicol);
  10. Pregnant and lactating women;
  11. Cases considered by the researcher as unsuitable for inclusion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: model intervention group
The model was used for prediction to guide the later dosing regimen
Dose prediction using population pharmacokinetic models.
No Intervention: Non-intervention group
In the non-intervention group, the doctor chose the treatment plan.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of antipyretic time 12 days after drug administration
Time Frame: Baseline and at the first 0 hour, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 96 hours, 120 hours, 144 hours, 168 hours, 192 hours, 216 hours, 240 hours, 264 hours, 288 hours after administration,
The antipyretic time of the experimental group is compared with that of the control group. If the antipyretic time of the experimental group is shorter than that of the control group, the experimental treatment is considered effective.
Baseline and at the first 0 hour, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 96 hours, 120 hours, 144 hours, 168 hours, 192 hours, 216 hours, 240 hours, 264 hours, 288 hours after administration,

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Yudong Qiu, The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Febrile Neutropenia

Clinical Trials on Dose prediction using population pharmacokinetic models

Subscribe