The Effect Evaluation of Continuous Nursing Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetic Retinopathy
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100176
- Beijing Tongren Hospital,Capital Medical University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- ADULT
- OLDER_ADULT
- CHILD
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- (1) DR diagnosis and classification criteria in line with the latest version of the 2017 Clinical Guidelines for Diabetic Retinopathy developed by the American Eye Association [9];
- (2) Type 2 diabetes course of more than 5 years, with varying degrees of retinopathy;
- (3) Monocular disease, no blindness;
- (4) Education level above primary school; - (5) Patients informed consent for this study and signed a consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
- (1) with severe cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction, severe nephrotic syndrome, senile dementia, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases;
- (2) Patients with macular edema, severe corneal (and) or lens opacity affect the observation of the fundus, angle-closure glaucoma can not mydriasis, other fundus diseases, and nursing interventions for other chronic diseases. This study was approved by the ethics committee of our hospital.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: intervention group
Continuous nursing intervention was performed on the basis of the control group
|
Intervention group: Continuous nursing intervention was performed on the basis of the control group: ①A continuous nursing intervention group was established.
The group members included chief physician, attending physician, head nurse, specialist nurse and nutritionist.
②The establishment of patient records, patients admitted to hospital by the primary nurse to record the basic situation of patients, including name, age, history of diabetes, DR staging, vision and blood glucose before treatment and other information.
③Personalized nursing intervention was given during hospitalization.
Systematic health education was carried out for patients on admission.
Targeted psychological counseling was given to some patients.
④After discharge to give continuous care, organize patients to join the WeChat group, group to share knowledge of DR-related diseases, to understand the patient 's medication, diet, vision, the patient 's questions and problems to guide and improve.
Other Names:
|
|
NO_INTERVENTION: control group
discharge guidance was performed according to routine nursing intervention at the time of discharge, and the patients were informed to return to the hospital for regular review (review was performed at 1 month, 3 months, half a year, 1 year, and 2 years after discharge, respectively).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
DR patient care satisfaction questionnaire during follow-up
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Each item was scored according to three levels of 10 points, 6 points and 2 points, with a total score of 20-100 points.
The higher the score, the higher the nursing satisfaction
|
2 years
|
|
The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA)
Time Frame: 2 years
|
The translated Chinese version of the SDSCA scale consists of 11 items, reflecting five parts of self-management : diet, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, foot care, and drugs.
Each item is scored by 8 levels of 0-7 points, of which 1 item is a reverse question.
The purpose of this scale is to measure the self-management behavior of patients within 7 days.
The total score is 0~77 points.
The higher the score, the better the self-management ability.
Above 56 points is good for self-management ability, 42~56 points is medium, and below 42 points is poor.
|
2 years
|
|
Criteria for visual acuity changes
Time Frame: 2 years
|
|
2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- BeijingTH001
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.