Fecal Microbiota Transplantation to Relieve Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Without Constipation (TRAMIR)

March 10, 2025 updated by: Cammarota Giovanni, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

TRApianto di Microbiota Intestinale in Pazienti Affetti da Sindrome Dell'Intestino IRritabile Senza Stipsi: Studio Clinico Randomizzato Controllato in Singolo Centro

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a complex multifactorial functional disorder, whose pathophysiology is largely associated to an impairment of the intestinal microbiota composition, namely dysbiosis. Thus, the modulation of the gut microbiota has been proposed as a possible therapeutic strategy for IBS patients alongside with current available drugs. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a promising strategy to restore intestinal eubiosis. In this randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial patients diagnosed with IBS without constipation are assigned with 1:1 ratio to receive FMT from healthy donor or autologous FMT (placebo group) to assess the effectiveness of FMT on IBS symptoms and quality of life, to evaluate the safety of FMT among IBS patients and to estimate any change in the gut microbiota composition of IBS patients after the FMT.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common chronic functional disorder with a prevalence varying between 10 and 15%. IBS is characterized by recurrent chronic abdominal pain associated with altered defecation. Intestinal dysbiosis is thought to be one of the major drivers in IBS pathophysiology, since several studies have shown that there are substantial differences in microbial composition between IBS patients and healthy subjects. Moreover, the modulation of the gut microbiota in IBS patients seems a promising therapeutic approach, since a benefit on symptoms with certain antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and diet has been reported. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from healthy donors is generally considered a safe and well-tolerated procedure ant it is described to be capable of restoring eubiosis of the recipient in the long term. Recently, a certain effectiveness of FMT in ameliorating intestinal symptoms, psychological aspects and quality of life alongside with a restoration of eubiosis among IBS patients has been described. This is a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial aimed at estimating the benefits of FMT among IBS patients without constipation. The assessment of the effectiveness on IBS symptoms and quality of life, the evaluation of the safety and the changes in the gut microbiota composition (performed with shotgun sequencing techniques) among IBS patients will be evaluated before after the FMT. 35 patients will be enrolled in 24 months. Recruited subjects will be randomized with 1:1 ratio to receive FMT from healthy donors or autologous FMT (placebo). The effectiveness of FMT in improving the IBS symptoms and IBS-related quality of life will be estimated with the IBS-SSS and IBS-QOL questionnaire, respectively, before FMT and after 30, 60, 90 and 365 days. Moreover, the frequency and form of evacuations according to the Bristol scale will be recorded at the same timepoints from diaries provided to the patients. Changes in gut microbiota composition will be estimated by comparing the composition of the faecal microbiota of the recipient before and 90 days after the FMT. The data will be evaluated using Intention-to-treat (ITT) statistical analysis and per-protocol (PP) analysis. Difference between the two groups will be calculated by two-tailed tests, Wilcoxon-Rank Sum Test for continuous variables and by the Fisher's exact probability test for categorical variables. The response rate to FMT will be evaluated by the Fisher's exact test. Adverse events will be assessed. The composition of the faecal microbiota of the recipient before and after the FMT will also be analysed and also compared with the healthy donor's one using the UniFrac method.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
35

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ability to express and give informed consent
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Diagnosis of diarrhoea-predominant or unclassified IBS, according to the Rome IV criteria
  • Have performed a colonoscopy within the last 5 years that has ruled out intestinal diseases

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Taking antibiotics or probiotics within the 8 weeks before the baseline visit
  • Patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, indeterminate colitis or eosinophilic gastroenteritis), malignant neoplasms of the gastroenteric tract, celiac disease, diverticular disease
  • Uncontrolled heart failure or severe heart disease with EF < 30%
  • Severe respiratory failure
  • Serious psychiatric conditions or psychological instability according to the clinician
  • Contraindication to fecal microbiota transplantation (high risk of complications related to colonoscopy)
  • Previous abdominal surgery on the gastroenteric tract (except cholecystectomy, appendectomy and other types of surgery not involving the digestive tract)
  • Patients with cutaneous enterostomy
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Concurrent enrollment in other interventional experimental protocols
  • Personality unstable or unable to adhere to protocol procedures
  • Any clinical condition which, in the opinion of the investigators, may contraindicate enrollment in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: FMT from healthy donor
Subjects receiving a single infusion FMT via colonoscopy from healthy donor
Procedure: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT)
Single FMT infusion via colonoscopy
Placebo Comparator: Autologous FMT
Subjects receiving a single infusion autologous FMT via colonoscopy
Procedure: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT)
Single FMT infusion via colonoscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improving IBS symptoms assessed with the IBS severity scoring system (IBS-SSS)
Time Frame: 365 days
To assess the effectiveness of healthy donor FMT in improving the symptoms of IBS without constipation compared to autologous microbiota transplantation using the IBS-SSS (< 175: mild IBS; 175-300: moderate IBS; > 300: severe IBS)
365 days
Number and severity grade of adverse events after FMT
Time Frame: 365 days
To assess the number and severity grade of adverse events occurred after FMT
365 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life related to IBS evaluated with the IBS Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) questionnaire
Time Frame: 365 days
To assess the effectiveness of healthy donor gut microbiota transplantation in improving the quality of life of patients with IBS without constipation compared to autologous FMT using the IBS-QOL questionnaire (range: 34-170; lower scores indicate better IBS-QoL)
365 days
Engraftment of donor microbiota after FMT, evaluated through the 16s rRNA sequencing
Time Frame: 365 days
Changes in the fecal microbiota of the recipients after FMT from healthy donor or autologous microbiota transplantation will be evaluated through the 16s rRNA sequencing and compared to the baseline condition
365 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 23, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 23, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 23, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 10, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 4474

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings