Patients with Stage III-IVa Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma with or Without a Mobile Medical Platform Full-course Nutritional Intervention
A Randomized, Controlled, Phase II Clinical Study on the Improvement of Malnutrition in Patients with Stage III-IVa Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma with or Without the Use of Mobile Medical Platform Full-course Nutritional Intervention
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Qiuyan Chen, PhD
- Phone Number: 86-20-8734-3380
- Email: chenqy@sysucc.org.cn
Study Locations
-
-
Guangdong
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 1.Voluntarily participate and sign the informed consent in writing.
- 2.Stage III-IVa (AJCC 8th edition staging) .
- 3.Received induction chemotherapy + concurrent chemoradiotherapy .
- 4.18-70 years old.
- 5.Pathologically diagnosed with non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma (differentiated or undifferentiated, that is, WHO type II or III).
- 6.No previous anti-tumor therapy .
- 7.ECOG score 0-1.
- 8.Ensure contraception during the study period.
- 9.Hemoglobin (HGB) ≥90 g/L, white blood cell (WBC) ≥4×109/L, platelet (PLT) ≥100×109/L.
- 10. Liver function: ALT, AST < 2.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), total bilirubin < 2.0 × ULN.
- 11. Renal function: serum creatinine <1.5×ULN.
- 12.Able and willing to use a mobile phone or tablet to fill in the electronic scale.
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1.Received antitumor therapy in the past.
- 2. The pathology was keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (WHO type I).
- 3.Pregnant women who are in the reproductive period and have not taken effective contraceptive measures.
- 4. Has suffered from other malignant tumors (except for cured basal cell carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of the cervix).
- 5.Patients with significantly low heart, liver, lung, kidney and bone marrow functions.
- 6.Serious, uncontrolled medical diseases and infections.
- 7.Concurrent use of other experimental drugs or other clinical trials.
- 8. Refused or unable to sign the informed consent to participate in the trial.
- 9.Those who have other contraindications to treatment.
- 10.Persons with personality or mental disorders, no capacity for civil conduct or limited capacity for civil conduct.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Mobile Platform Intervention Group
The mobile platform is used to evaluate the nutrition of patients 2 weeks after the first course of induction chemotherapy, before radiotherapy, during radiotherapy, after radiotherapy, and 1 month after radiotherapy.
The doctor pushes individualized nutrition education, oral advice, medication advice, etc. .
|
Intervention using WeChat
|
|
Active Comparator: Non-mobile Platform Intervention Group
Nutritional assessment of patients was performed at 2 weeks after 1 course of induction chemotherapy, before radiotherapy, during radiotherapy, at the end of radiotherapy, and at 1 month after the end of radiotherapy.
|
Intervention using WeChat
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
weight loss
Time Frame: 1 month after chemoradiotherapy
|
Differences in the proportion of patients who lost >10% of their body weight at 1 month after chemoradiotherapy between experimental and control groups
|
1 month after chemoradiotherapy
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
weight loss >10%
Time Frame: at the end of chemoradiotherapy
|
Differences in the proportion of patients who lost >10% of their body weight at the end of chemoradiotherapy between experimental and control groups
|
at the end of chemoradiotherapy
|
|
weight loss >20%
Time Frame: at the end of chemoradiotherapy
|
Differences in the proportion of patients who lost >20% of their body weight at the end of chemoradiotherapy between experimental and control groups
|
at the end of chemoradiotherapy
|
|
ncidence rate of adverse events (AEs)
Time Frame: at the end of chemoradiotherapy
|
Analysis of acute and late adverse events (AEs) are evaluated.
Numbers of patients of treatment-related adverse events(acute toxicity) as assessed by CTCAE v5.0.Numbers of patients of late radiation toxicities were assessed using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer late radiation morbidity scoring scheme.
|
at the end of chemoradiotherapy
|
|
change of PG-SGA
Time Frame: 1 month after chemoradiotherapy
|
Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA).It consists of two parts: the patient's self-assessment part and the medical staff's assessment part.
The specific contents include seven aspects, including body weight, food intake, symptoms, activity and physical function, the relationship between disease and nutritional needs, metabolic needs, and physical examination.
The first 4 Each aspect is evaluated by the patient himself, and the last three aspects are evaluated by the medical staff.
The overall evaluation includes qualitative evaluation and quantitative evaluation.
|
1 month after chemoradiotherapy
|
|
change of NRS2002
Time Frame: 1 month after chemoradiotherapy
|
The outstanding advantage of NRS2002 is that it can predict the risk of malnutrition, and can proactively and dynamically judge the changes in the nutritional status of patients, which is convenient for timely feedback of the nutritional status of patients, and provides evidence for adjusting nutritional support programs.
It is a better nutritional risk screening tool.
|
1 month after chemoradiotherapy
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Stomatognathic Diseases
- Neoplasms by Site
- Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
- Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases
- Pharyngeal Neoplasms
- Otorhinolaryngologic Neoplasms
- Nasopharyngeal Diseases
- Pharyngeal Diseases
- Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- Carcinoma
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021-FXY-332
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.