SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT EDUCATION GIVEN WITH MICRO TEACHING METHOD ENRICHED WITH STANDARD PATIENT IN PALLIATIVE CARE
THE EFFECT OF SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT EDUCATION GIVEN WITH MICRO TEACHING METHOD ENRICHED WITH STANDARD PATIENT IN PALLIATIVE CARE ON NURSING STUDENTS' KNOWLEDGE LEVEL, REFLECTIVE THINKING LEVEL AND THERAPEUTIC COMMUNICATION SKILLS
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Esra Tayaz, phd
- Phone Number: 05078106288
- Email: esratayaz@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Mamak
-
Ankara, Mamak, Turkey
- Recruiting
- Esra Tayaz
-
Contact:
- Esra Tayaz
- Phone Number: 05078106288
- Email: esratayaz@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Students taking palliative care course for the first time,
- Students who agreed to participate in the study,
Exclusion Criteria:
- Students who have already taken the palliative care course,
- Students who answered the data collection forms incompletely,
- Students who do not want to continue the research,
- Students who missed even one of the theoretical or practical sessions of the study.
- Students with experience of caring for a palliative care patient
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention group
Micro-teaching enriched with standard patient will be applied.
|
The practice group will be shared the 4 most common symptoms in palliative care nursing: pain, fatigue, respiratory distress and loss of appetite.
The practice group will be 5 groups and there will be 4 students in each group.
During the practice, each student will provide patient education about only one symptom.
The standard patient will participate in the intervention in the application laboratory and the students will participate in the intervention in the computer environment.
Video recordings will be taken while the students are giving education.
After watching the experts, peers and their own video with the micro-teaching group evaluation form, the student himself/herself will make an evaluation.
At the same time, a lecturer from outside the research will fill in the Standard Patient Check-List Evaluation Form.
The application will be repeated one week later.
|
|
No Intervention: Control group
The control group will receive palliative care brochure for patients and their relatives.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
KNOWLEDGE LEVEL
Time Frame: 2 months
|
A knowledge test on symptom management and communication in palliative care was developed by the researcher.
It consists of 25 questions.
|
2 months
|
|
REFLECTIVE THINKING LEVEL
Time Frame: 2 months
|
Scale for Determining the Level of Reflective Thinking will be used.
It is a 16-item 5-point Likert-type scale consisting of four sub-dimensions.
Its sub-dimensions are habituation, comprehension, reflection and critical reflection.
|
2 months
|
|
THERAPEUTIC COMMUNICATION SKILLS
Time Frame: 2 months
|
Therapeutic Communication Skills Scale for Nursing Students will be used.
It is a 7-point Likert scale consisting of a total of 16 items, including 7 items in the NonTherapeutic Communication Skills sub-dimension, 6 items in the Therapeutic Communication Skills 1 sub-dimension, and 3 items in the Therapeutic Communication Skills 2 sub-dimension.
|
2 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Micro Teaching Group Evaluation Form
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
It was created by the researcher.
It will be used for self-assessment by experts, peers and the student during the implementation.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Standard Patient Evaluation Form
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Created by the researcher.
It will be filled in by specialists during standardized patient practice.
|
2 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2023-06
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.