Hybrid Argon Plasma Coagulation and Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Validation Study (HAPCET2)
Hybrid Argon Plasma Coagulation and Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Trial: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Validation Trial in a Community Setting
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Chase Wooley, BS
- Phone Number: (919) 336-4171
- Email: Chase@trueyouweightloss.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Areebah Waseem, BS
- Phone Number: (919) 689-5189
- Email: Areebah@TrueYouWeightLoss.com
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Cary, North Carolina, United States, 27513
- True You Weight Loss
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 21-65
- BMI ≥ 30 and ≤40 kg/m²
- Willingness to comply with the substantial lifelong dietary restrictions required by the procedure.
- History of failure with non-surgical weight-loss methods.
- Willingness to follow protocol requirements, including signed informed consent, routine follow-up schedule, completing laboratory tests, and completing diet counseling.
- Residing within a reasonable driving distance from the investigator's office (Cary, NC) and able to travel to the investigator to complete all routine follow-up visits as applicable
- Ability to give informed consent.
- Women of childbearing potential (i.e., not post-menopausal or surgically sterilized) must agree to use adequate birth control methods.
- Reliable access to wi-fi and/or internet services.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of foregut or gastrointestinal (GI) surgery (except uncomplicated cholecystectomy or appendectomy).
- Prior gastrointestinal surgery with sequelae, i.e., obstruction, and/or adhesive peritonitis or known abdominal adhesions.
- Prior open or laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
- Prior surgery of any kind on the esophagus, stomach, or any type of hiatal hernia surgery.
- Any inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract including severe (LA Grade C or D) esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, gastric ulceration, duodenal ulceration, cancer, or specific inflammatory disease such as Crohn's disease or celiac disease.
- Potential upper gastrointestinal bleeding conditions such as esophageal or gastric varices, congenital or acquired intestinal telangiectasis, or other congenital anomalies of the gastrointestinal tract such as atresias or stenoses.
- Gastrointestinal stromal tumors, history of premalignant gastric lesions (intestinal metaplasia), history of familial and nan-familial adenomatous syndromes.
- A gastric mass or gastric polyps > 1 cm in size.
- A hiatal hernia > 4cm of axial displacement of the z-line above the diaphragm or severe or intractable gastro-esophageal reflux symptoms.
- A structural abnormality in the esophagus or pharynx such as a stricture or diverticulum that could impede passage of the endoscope.
- Achalasia or any other severe esophageal motility disorder
- Severe coagulopathy.
- Insulin-dependent diabetes (either Type 1 or Type 2) or a significant likelihood of requiring insulin treatment in the following 12 months or a HgbA1C≥9.
- Subjects with any serious health condition unrelated to their weight that would increase the risk of endoscopy.
- Chronic abdominal pain.
- Motility disorders of the GI tract such as gross esophageal motility disorders, gastroparesis or intractable constipation.
- Hepatic insufficiency or cirrhosis.
- Use of an intragastric device prior to this study due to the increased thickness of the stomach wall preventing effective suturing.
- Active psychological issues preventing participation in a life-style modification program as determined by a psychologist.
- Patients unwilling to participate in an established medically supervised diet and behavior modification program, with routine medical follow-up.
- Patients receiving daily prescribed treatment with high dose aspirin (> 81mg daily), anti-inflammatory agents, anticoagulants, or other gastric irritants.
- Patients who are unable or unwilling to take prescribed proton pump inhibitor medication.
- Patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding.
- Patients currently taking weight-loss medications or other therapies for weight loss within the prior 6 months.
- Subjects with severe cardiopulmonary disease or other serious organic disease which might include known history of coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction within the past 6 months, poorly controlled hypertension, required use of NSAIDs.
- Subjects taking medications on specified hourly intervals that may be affected by changes to gastric emptying, such as anti-seizure or anti-arrhythmic medications.
- Subjects who are taking corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and narcotics.
- Symptomatic congestive heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia, or unstable coronary artery disease.
- Pre-existing respiratory disease such as moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring steroids, pneumonia, or cancer.
- Diagnosis of autoimmune connective tissue disorder (e.g. Systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma) or immunocompromised.
- Specific diagnosed genetic disorder such as Prader Willi syndrome.
- Eating disorders including night eating syndrome (NES), bulimia, binge eating disorder, or compulsive overeating.
- Known history of endocrine disorders affecting weight such as uncontrolled hypothyroidism.
- At the discretion of the PI for subject safety
- If minority inclusion population target of 10% has not been reached by the 90% enrollment mark (example 43 of 48 subjects), the remaining enrollments will be reserved for minority subjects (example 5 of 48 subjects).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Hybrid Argon Plasma Coagulation and Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty
Hybrid APC will be utilized to first ablate the gastric mucosa along the greater curve of the stomach, followed immediately by endoscopic full-thickness tissue acquisition and plication using 2-0 Prolene synthetic sutures via the Apollo ESG platform.
|
Hybrid APC will be utilized to first ablate the gastric mucosa along the greater curve of the stomach.
Endoscopic full-thickness tissue acquisition and plication using 2-0 Prolene synthetic sutures via the Apollo ESG platform.
|
|
Active Comparator: Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty
Endoscopic full-thickness tissue acquisition and plication using 2-0 Prolene synthetic sutures via the Apollo ESG platform.
|
Endoscopic full-thickness tissue acquisition and plication using 2-0 Prolene synthetic sutures via the Apollo ESG platform.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Durability assessed by blinded physician(s) with expertise in endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) procedures graded according to a priori standardized criteria.
Time Frame: 6 Months
|
The primary outcomes are durability of plications and endoscopic sutures on repeat endoscopy at 6 months, in the two randomized arms.
Durability of plications and endoscopic sutures will be assessed by blinded physician(s) with expertise in ESG who will assess sleeve-like anatomy (scale: None, Some, Typical), tissue bonding (scale: None, Some, Plenty), and tightness of sutures (scale: Loose, Somewhat tight, Tight) to measure durability.
|
6 Months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
%EWL
Time Frame: 6 and 12 month
|
Compared between treatment arms using ANCOVA with adjustment for the same variables specified in the primary analysis
|
6 and 12 month
|
|
%TBWL
Time Frame: 6 Month
|
Compared between treatment arms using ANCOVA with adjustment for the same variables specified in the primary analysis
|
6 Month
|
|
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 6 month
|
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared between treatment arms using ANCOVA with adjustment for the same variables specified in the primary analysis
|
6 month
|
|
HbA1c percentage
Time Frame: 6 Month
|
Percentage of red blood cells that have glucose-coated hemoglobin compared between treatment arms using ANCOVA with adjustment for the same variables specified in the primary analysis
|
6 Month
|
|
Change in quality of life measured by Questionnaire: Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: 6 Month
|
Changes in Short Form Health Survey responses compared between treatment arms using ANCOVA with adjustment for the same variables specified in the primary analysis.
Minimum score of 38 and maximum score of 149.
Quality of life outcome determined by changes in individual scores on each respective question.
|
6 Month
|
|
Change in quality of life measured by Questionnaire: Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite)
Time Frame: 6 Month
|
Changes in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite responses compared between treatment arms using ANCOVA with adjustment for the same variables specified in the primary analysis.
Minimum score of 31 and maximum score of 155 with a higher score reflective of poor self-assessed quality of life.
|
6 Month
|
|
Change in depression measured by Questionnaire: Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 6 Month
|
Changes in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) responses compared between treatment arms using ANCOVA with adjustment for the same variables specified in the primary analysis.
Minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 27 with lower scores reflective of no or mild depression, medium scores reflective of moderate depression, and high scores reflective of severe depression.
|
6 Month
|
|
Change in eating behavior measured by Questionnaire: The Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-r18)
Time Frame: 6 Month
|
Change in eating behaviors measured by Questionnaire: The Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-r18) compared between treatment arms using ANCOVA with adjustment for the same variables specified in the primary analysis.
Minimum score of 18 and maximum score of 80 with higher scores associated with disinhibition, hunger, and decreased cognitive restraint.
|
6 Month
|
|
Binary Outcomes: ≥25% change in %EWL
Time Frame: 6 Month
|
Compared between treatment arms by Pearson Chi-square test.
|
6 Month
|
|
Incidence of esophagitis
Time Frame: 6 Month
|
Incidence of esophagitis identified by trained physician(s) to be compared between treatment arms by Pearson Chi-square test.
|
6 Month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christopher E McGowan, MD, MSCR, CEO/Medical Director
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, Davies M, Van Gaal LF, Lingvay I, McGowan BM, Rosenstock J, Tran MTD, Wadden TA, Wharton S, Yokote K, Zeuthen N, Kushner RF; STEP 1 Study Group. Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity. N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 18;384(11):989-1002. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032183. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
- Baretta GA, Alhinho HC, Matias JE, Marchesini JB, de Lima JH, Empinotti C, Campos JM. Argon plasma coagulation of gastrojejunal anastomosis for weight regain after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2015 Jan;25(1):72-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1363-2.
- Wadden TA, Butryn ML, Wilson C. Lifestyle modification for the management of obesity. Gastroenterology. 2007 May;132(6):2226-38. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.051. Erratum In: Gastroenterology. 2007 Jul;133(1):371.
- Adams KF, Schatzkin A, Harris TB, Kipnis V, Mouw T, Ballard-Barbash R, Hollenbeck A, Leitzmann MF. Overweight, obesity, and mortality in a large prospective cohort of persons 50 to 71 years old. N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 24;355(8):763-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055643. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
- Abu Dayyeh BK, Rajan E, Gostout CJ. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: a potential endoscopic alternative to surgical sleeve gastrectomy for treatment of obesity. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Sep;78(3):530-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.04.197. Epub 2013 May 24.
- Prospective Studies Collaboration; Whitlock G, Lewington S, Sherliker P, Clarke R, Emberson J, Halsey J, Qizilbash N, Collins R, Peto R. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet. 2009 Mar 28;373(9669):1083-96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60318-4. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
- Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of Obesity and Severe Obesity Among Adults: United States, 2017-2018. NCHS Data Brief. 2020 Feb;(360):1-8.
- Hedjoudje A, Abu Dayyeh BK, Cheskin LJ, Adam A, Neto MG, Badurdeen D, Morales JG, Sartoretto A, Nava GL, Vargas E, Sui Z, Fayad L, Farha J, Khashab MA, Kalloo AN, Alqahtani AR, Thompson CC, Kumbhari V. Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 May;18(5):1043-1053.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.022. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
- Mitchell NS, Catenacci VA, Wyatt HR, Hill JO. Obesity: overview of an epidemic. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2011 Dec;34(4):717-32. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2011.08.005.
- Flegal KM, Kit BK, Orpana H, Graubard BI. Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013 Jan 2;309(1):71-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.113905.
- Ward ZJ, Bleich SN, Cradock AL, Barrett JL, Giles CM, Flax C, Long MW, Gortmaker SL. Projected U.S. State-Level Prevalence of Adult Obesity and Severe Obesity. N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 19;381(25):2440-2450. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1909301.
- Kheniser K, Saxon DR, Kashyap SR. Long-Term Weight Loss Strategies for Obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Jun 16;106(7):1854-1866. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab091.
- Wadden TA, Bailey TS, Billings LK, Davies M, Frias JP, Koroleva A, Lingvay I, O'Neil PM, Rubino DM, Skovgaard D, Wallenstein SOR, Garvey WT; STEP 3 Investigators. Effect of Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo as an Adjunct to Intensive Behavioral Therapy on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity: The STEP 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Apr 13;325(14):1403-1413. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1831.
- Davies M, Faerch L, Jeppesen OK, Pakseresht A, Pedersen SD, Perreault L, Rosenstock J, Shimomura I, Viljoen A, Wadden TA, Lingvay I; STEP 2 Study Group. Semaglutide 2.4 mg once a week in adults with overweight or obesity, and type 2 diabetes (STEP 2): a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021 Mar 13;397(10278):971-984. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00213-0. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
- Enebo LB, Berthelsen KK, Kankam M, Lund MT, Rubino DM, Satylganova A, Lau DCW. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of concomitant administration of multiple doses of cagrilintide with semaglutide 2.4 mg for weight management: a randomised, controlled, phase 1b trial. Lancet. 2021 May 8;397(10286):1736-1748. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00845-X. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
- Bal BS, Finelli FC, Shope TR, Koch TR. Nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012 Sep;8(9):544-56. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2012.48. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
- Proietto J. Why is treating obesity so difficult? Justification for the role of bariatric surgery. Med J Aust. 2011 Aug 1;195(3):144-6. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03242.x.
- Sharaiha RZ, Hajifathalian K, Kumar R, Saunders K, Mehta A, Ang B, Skaf D, Shah S, Herr A, Igel L, Dawod Q, Dawod E, Sampath K, Carr-Locke D, Brown R, Cohen D, Dannenberg AJ, Mahadev S, Shukla A, Aronne LJ. Five-Year Outcomes of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for the Treatment of Obesity. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 May;19(5):1051-1057.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.09.055. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
- Mahmoud T, Vargas EJ, Ghazi R, Abusaleh R, Storm AC, Abu Dayyeh BK. The Osculating Circles Gastroplasty: A Novel Endoscopic Submucosal Resection Enhanced Endoluminal Suturing for Obesity. Gastroenterology. 2021 Dec;161(6):1806-1808.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.08.059. Epub 2021 Sep 26. No abstract available.
- Zenker M. Argon plasma coagulation. GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip. 2008 Nov 3;3(1):Doc15.
- Jirapinyo P, de Moura DTH, Dong WY, Farias G, Thompson CC. Dose response for argon plasma coagulation in the treatment of weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 May;91(5):1078-1084. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.036. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
- Itani MI, Farha J, Sartoretto A, Abbarh S, Badurdeen D, de Moura DTH, Kumbhari V. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty with argon plasma coagulation: A novel technique. J Dig Dis. 2020 Nov;21(11):664-667. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12939.
- Lee JH, Johannes RS, Van Dam J, et al. 7087 Argon plasma coagulation in endoscopic therapy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2000;51:AB264.
- Marchesini SD, Baretta GA, Cambi MP, Marchesini JB. Endoscopic plasma argon coagulation in treatment of weight regain after bariatric surgery: what does the patient think about this? Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):47-50. doi: 10.1590/s0102-6720201400s100012.
- Dhindsa BS, Saghir SM, Naga Y, Dhaliwal A, Ramai D, Cross C, Singh S, Bhat I, Adler DG. Efficacy of transoral outlet reduction in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients to promote weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2020 Oct;8(10):E1332-E1340. doi: 10.1055/a-1214-5822. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
- Storm AC, Thompson CC. Endoscopic Treatments Following Bariatric Surgery. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2017 Apr;27(2):233-244. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2016.12.007.
- Jaruvongvanich V, Vantanasiri K, Laoveeravat P, Matar RH, Vargas EJ, Maselli DB, Alkhatry M, Fayad L, Kumbhari V, Fittipaldi-Fernandez RJ, Hollenbach M, Watson RR, Gustavo de Quadros L, Galvao Neto M, Aepli P, Staudenmann D, Brunaldi VO, Storm AC, Martin JA, Gomez V, Abu Dayyeh BK. Endoscopic full-thickness suturing plus argon plasma mucosal coagulation versus argon plasma mucosal coagulation alone for weight regain after gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Dec;92(6):1164-1175.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
- Catalano MF, Rudic G, Anderson AJ, Chua TY. Weight gain after bariatric surgery as a result of a large gastric stoma: endotherapy with sodium morrhuate may prevent the need for surgical revision. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Aug;66(2):240-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.06.061. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
- de Moura DTH, Badurdeen DS, Ribeiro IB, Leite EFMDSD, Thompson CC, Kumbhari V. Perspectives toward minimizing the adverse events of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Nov;92(5):1115-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.038. Epub 2020 Jun 17. No abstract available.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- RCT-001
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Obesity
-
NCT06671119RecruitingObesity Prevention | Obesity Recidivism | Obesity and Overweight | Obesity and Obesity-related Medical Conditions
-
NCT05938335Not yet recruiting
-
NCT02645422Enrolling by invitation
-
NCT04780828CompletedObesity, Morbid | Obesity, Adolescent | Obesity, Abdominal | Weight, Body | Obesity, Visceral
-
NCT03843424CompletedOvernutrition | Nutrition Disorders | Overweight | Body Weight | Pediatric Obesity | Body Weight Changes | Childhood Obesity | Weight Gain | Adolescent Obesity | Obesity, Childhood
-
NCT06734312RecruitingObesity Prevention | Obesity Recidivism | Obesity and Overweight | GLP-1 | Obesity and Obesity-related Medical Conditions | Ablation Techniques
-
NCT04698135CompletedMorbid Obesity | Metabolically Healthy Obesity
-
NCT03219658Completed
-
NCT03899311Completed
-
NCT03203161Not yet recruitingMorbid Obesity | Adolescent Obesity | Bariatric Surgery
Clinical Trials on Hybrid Argon Plasma Coagulation
-
NCT04197180RecruitingGastric Low Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia
-
NCT05645679Recruiting
-
NCT05486338Active, not recruitingObesity | Adiposity
-
NCT04015765CompletedColorectal Cancer | Polyp of Colon
-
NCT05051475CompletedBarrett Esophagus | Esophageal Adenocarcinoma | Reflux Disease
-
NCT06271941RecruitingColorectal Cancer | Polyp of Colon
-
NCT06757920CompletedEndobronchial Carcinoid
-
NCT00428285CompletedHIV Infections | Anus Neoplasms
-
NCT02548338Completed
-
NCT05250518Not yet recruitingColorectal Polyp | Post-polypectomy Bleeding