Whole-process Quality Improvement of Endovascular Treatment Basd on an AI-aided Clinical Feedback System

November 17, 2025 updated by: Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Whole-process Quality Improvement of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Endovascular Treatment Based on an Artificial Intelligence-aided Clinical Feedback System

A clustered randomized control trial to evaluate whether multi-aspect intervention based on an AI-aided clinical feedback system could improve the quality of EVT and functional outcome of patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Endovascular treatment (EVT) is the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO) according to current guidelines. However, while a rapidly-growing number of stroke centers become capable of performing EVT, the general quality of EVT remains unsatisfied, resulting in a considerable proportion of patients who could not reach functional independence. Our pre-established artificial intelligence (AI)-aided clinical feedback system could dynamically record and report key timepoints of EVT in-hospital process. Combined with multi-aspect intervention via remote/on-site surveillance and education, this may be a potential solution for quality improvement of EVT. Therefore, the aim of the study is to evaluate whether an AI-aided clinical feedback system coupled with multi-aspect intervention could improve the quality of EVT. Twenty hospitals with annual EVT cases > 30 will be 1:1 randomized into intervention group and control group. The intervention group will receive AI-based clinical feedback system coupled with multi-aspect intervention, including remote/on-site surveillance and education regarding in-hospital workflow and surgical procedures of EVT. The control group only deploys AI-aided clinical feedback system. The primary outcome is the ratio of good functional outcome at 3 month.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1289

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Hangzhou, China
        • Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18
  • AIS patients receiving EVT within 24 hours of stroke onset
  • Written informed consent is obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients refuse to participate in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention
AI-aided clinical feedback system coupled with multi-aspect intervention based on the Behaviour Change Wheel model
Behavioral: AI-aided clinical feedback system coupled with multi-aspect intervention basd on Behaviour Change Wheel model
Interventions are developed on a psychological model, the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) .The fundamental of BCW consists of three essential elements: capability, motivation, and opportunity. Improving individual's capability, providing motivation, and increasing opportunities are goals of behaviour change intervention. To achieve the goals, 9 intervention components have been proposed in the BCW framework, and 6 components will be used in current study.
No Intervention: Control
AI-aided clinical feedback system only

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ratio of favorable functional outcome at 3 month
Time Frame: 3 months
Ratio of patients with mRS ≤ 3 at 3-month follow up
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mRS score at 3 month
Time Frame: 3 months
mRS score at 3-month follow up
3 months
Mortality at 3 month
Time Frame: 3 months
Mortality at 3-month follow up
3 months
Ratio of hemorrhagic transformation at 24 hour
Time Frame: 24 hours
Ratio of hemorrhagic transformation at 24 hour after EVT
24 hours
Ratio of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hour
Time Frame: 24 hours
Ratio of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hour after EVT
24 hours
Door to groin puncture time
Time Frame: 24 hours
Time interval between admission and groin puncture
24 hours
Ratio of door to groin puncture time < 90 min
Time Frame: 24 hours
Time interval between admission and groin puncture <90 min
24 hours
Ratio of door to groin puncture time < 60 min
Time Frame: 24 hours
Time interval between admission and groin puncture <60 min
24 hours
Procedural duration
Time Frame: 24 hours
Time interval between groin puncture and last time of digital subtraction angiography
24 hours
Ratio of successful reperfusion
Time Frame: 24 hours
Ratio of patients achieving modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) 2b or 3
24 hours
Ratio of good functional outcome at 3 month
Time Frame: 3 months
Ratio of patients with mRS ≤2 at 3-month follow up
3 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ratio of favorable functional outcome at 3 month in patients within 6 hours of stroke onset
Time Frame: 3 months
Ratio of mRS > 2 at 3 month follow-up in patients within 6 hours of stroke onset
3 months
Door to groin puncture time in patients within 6 hours of stroke onset
Time Frame: 24 hours
Time interval between admission and groin puncture in patients within 6 hours of stroke onset
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Zexin Chen, Ethics committee the second affiliated hospital, school of medicine, Zhejiang University, China

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 5, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 8, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 25, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 17, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • OPTIMAL

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings