Effect of Standard Laryngoscopy Versus Video-laryngoscopy (PROVU)
Efferct of Standard Laryngoscopy Versus Video-laryngoscop on First-attempt Success in Difficult Airways Undergoing ProVu TM Video Stylet Guided Intubationa (PROVU)
The aim of this open-label, randomized, 3-parallel arm trial is to compare success of intubation rate at first try between three groups that will be intubated:
- Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope (control group),
- Intubation ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope,
- Intubation ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscope.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Critical anesthetic incidents in the operating room are often related to airway management. Difficult airway management is defined as the clinical situation in which an anesthesiologist with conventional training has difficulty with upper airway face mask ventilation, difficulty with tracheal intubation, or both. Airway management has undergone a major transformation since the development of hyper-angle videolaryngoscopy (VL). Recently, the ProVuTM video stylet (Flexicare Medical Ltd, Mountain Ash, UK), which combines visualization technology with a tube guidance system, has been proposed as a new device for endotracheal intubation in participants with difficult airway management.
The investigators hypothesized that the ProVuTM video stylet combined with videolaryngoscopy or standard laryngoscopy may improve the success rate of intubation on the first attempt compared with using a videolaryngoscope alone in patientes with predicted difficult intubation. In fact, using ProVuTM the position of the video stylet tip can be adjusted continuously during the tracheal intubation maneuver.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Piedmont
-
Alessandria, Piedmont, Italy, 15121
- Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients undergoing elective surgery requiring oral tracheal intubation;
- ≥18 years of age;
- simplified Arné score ≥11;
- Written informed consent will be obtained from every participant.
Exclusion Criteria:
- ≤18 years of age
- interincisor distance at maximal mouth opening ≤2 cm;
- planned awake fiberoptic intubation because patients are patients considered to be high-risk for difficult intubation or difficult mask ventilation (e.g. with neck tumours, complete cervical arthrodesis; neck circumference >50 cm);
- patients at risk of gastric aspiration
- planned nasal intubation.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Control Group
Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope
|
After the induction of general anesthesia, the patient will undergo conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope
|
|
Experimental: Provu TM video stylet + hyperangulated videolaryngoscope
Intubation ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope
|
After the induction of general anesthesia, the patient will undergo intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope
|
|
Experimental: Provu TM video stylet + Macintosh laryngoscope
Intubation ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscope
|
After the induction of general anesthesia, the patient will undergo intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscope
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Success rate on first intubation attemps
Time Frame: During the procedure
|
The first-attempt intubation success is defined as tracheal tube placement with a single maneuver after insertion of the tube in the mouth.
Reinsertion of the tube in the mouth counts as an additional attempt.
|
During the procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time of intubation
Time Frame: During the procedure
|
Time from insertion of the laryngoscope beyond the dental rhyme to cuffed tube
|
During the procedure
|
|
Time of laryngoscopy
Time Frame: During the procedure
|
Time from insertion of the laryngoscope beyond the dental rhyme to the insertion of the tube beyond the dental rhyme
|
During the procedure
|
|
Number of intubation attempts
Time Frame: During the procedure
|
Times of reinsertion of the tube beyond the dental rhyme
|
During the procedure
|
|
Complications
Time Frame: During the procedure
|
Evaluation of the type and rate of complications, including desaturation < 90%, esophageal intubation, tooth breakage and bleeding from the oropharyngeal mucosa
|
During the procedure
|
|
Use of "jaw trust" or "BURP"
Time Frame: During the procedure
|
Need to perform adjuvant maneuvers (jaw trust or BURP), measured with yes/no
|
During the procedure
|
|
Need of another anesthesiologist intervention
Time Frame: During the procedure
|
Required intervention of another anesthesiologist, measured with yes/no, after 3 failed intubation attempt or after request of the first anesthesiologist
|
During the procedure
|
|
Needs to change the path of the intubation strategy
Time Frame: During the procedure
|
Needs to change intubation strategy, measured with yes/no, includes use of fiberoptic intubation, change of videolaryngoscope or postpone intervention
|
During the procedure
|
|
Learning curve analysis of intubation rate success
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Improvement of intubation rate success
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Learning curve analysis of time of procedure
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Improvement of time of procedure
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mirco Leo, Physician, Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ASO.RianGen.22.03
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Difficult Intubation
-
NCT03624439CompletedIntubation; Difficult or Failed | Difficult Airway | Intubation;Difficult
-
NCT01691703CompletedAnesthesia Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation | Failed or Difficult Intubation, Initial Encounter
-
NCT04783584RecruitingDifficult Intubation | Difficult Airway Intubation
-
NCT02493478RecruitingIntubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation, Sequela
-
NCT03194503CompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation;Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation, Sequela
-
NCT04105738TerminatedSurgery | Difficult Intubation | Anesthesia | Difficult Airway Intubation | Speech Dysfunction
-
NCT06986187RecruitingCardiac Surgery | Difficult Intubation | Difficult Airway | Difficult Airway Intubation | Cardiac Surgery in Adult Patient
-
NCT03545620CompletedDifficult Intubation | Difficult Airway
-
NCT07383610CompletedDifficult Intubation | Difficult Airway | Difficult Mask Ventilation
-
NCT02364622CompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation, Difficult
Clinical Trials on Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope
-
NCT05802316CompletedIntensive Care Unit Syndrome | Videolaryngoscopy
-
NCT07577648Active, not recruitingAirway Management
-
NCT04532138Unknown
-
NCT05522049CompletedGeneral Anesthesia | Intubation; Difficult or Failed | Videolaryngoscopy
-
NCT01976546CompletedPatients With One or More Predictors of Difficult Airway
-
NCT01816217TerminatedDifficult Intubation in ICU | Strictly More Than Two Laryngoscopies | Cormack Grade Three/Four
-
NCT03759561Completed
-
NCT07482436RecruitingCorrelation of Difficult Airway Markers With Ultrasonographic Measurements in Obese Patients
-
NCT03567902UnknownCervical Spinal Cord Injury | Intubation;Difficult
-
NCT06322719RecruitingIntubation | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or Failed | Acute Respiratory Failure | Videolaryngoscopy