Effect of Standard Laryngoscopy Versus Video-laryngoscopy (PROVU)

Efferct of Standard Laryngoscopy Versus Video-laryngoscop on First-attempt Success in Difficult Airways Undergoing ProVu TM Video Stylet Guided Intubationa (PROVU)

The aim of this open-label, randomized, 3-parallel arm trial is to compare success of intubation rate at first try between three groups that will be intubated:

  1. Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope (control group),
  2. Intubation ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope,
  3. Intubation ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscope.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Critical anesthetic incidents in the operating room are often related to airway management. Difficult airway management is defined as the clinical situation in which an anesthesiologist with conventional training has difficulty with upper airway face mask ventilation, difficulty with tracheal intubation, or both. Airway management has undergone a major transformation since the development of hyper-angle videolaryngoscopy (VL). Recently, the ProVuTM video stylet (Flexicare Medical Ltd, Mountain Ash, UK), which combines visualization technology with a tube guidance system, has been proposed as a new device for endotracheal intubation in participants with difficult airway management.

The investigators hypothesized that the ProVuTM video stylet combined with videolaryngoscopy or standard laryngoscopy may improve the success rate of intubation on the first attempt compared with using a videolaryngoscope alone in patientes with predicted difficult intubation. In fact, using ProVuTM the position of the video stylet tip can be adjusted continuously during the tracheal intubation maneuver.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

114

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Piedmont
      • Alessandria, Piedmont, Italy, 15121
        • Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients undergoing elective surgery requiring oral tracheal intubation;
  • ≥18 years of age;
  • simplified Arné score ≥11;
  • Written informed consent will be obtained from every participant.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ≤18 years of age
  • interincisor distance at maximal mouth opening ≤2 cm;
  • planned awake fiberoptic intubation because patients are patients considered to be high-risk for difficult intubation or difficult mask ventilation (e.g. with neck tumours, complete cervical arthrodesis; neck circumference >50 cm);
  • patients at risk of gastric aspiration
  • planned nasal intubation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Group
Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope
After the induction of general anesthesia, the patient will undergo conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope
Experimental: Provu TM video stylet + hyperangulated videolaryngoscope
Intubation ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope
After the induction of general anesthesia, the patient will undergo intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope
Experimental: Provu TM video stylet + Macintosh laryngoscope
Intubation ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscope
After the induction of general anesthesia, the patient will undergo intubation with ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscope

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success rate on first intubation attemps
Time Frame: During the procedure
The first-attempt intubation success is defined as tracheal tube placement with a single maneuver after insertion of the tube in the mouth. Reinsertion of the tube in the mouth counts as an additional attempt.
During the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time of intubation
Time Frame: During the procedure
Time from insertion of the laryngoscope beyond the dental rhyme to cuffed tube
During the procedure
Time of laryngoscopy
Time Frame: During the procedure
Time from insertion of the laryngoscope beyond the dental rhyme to the insertion of the tube beyond the dental rhyme
During the procedure
Number of intubation attempts
Time Frame: During the procedure
Times of reinsertion of the tube beyond the dental rhyme
During the procedure
Complications
Time Frame: During the procedure
Evaluation of the type and rate of complications, including desaturation < 90%, esophageal intubation, tooth breakage and bleeding from the oropharyngeal mucosa
During the procedure
Use of "jaw trust" or "BURP"
Time Frame: During the procedure
Need to perform adjuvant maneuvers (jaw trust or BURP), measured with yes/no
During the procedure
Need of another anesthesiologist intervention
Time Frame: During the procedure
Required intervention of another anesthesiologist, measured with yes/no, after 3 failed intubation attempt or after request of the first anesthesiologist
During the procedure
Needs to change the path of the intubation strategy
Time Frame: During the procedure
Needs to change intubation strategy, measured with yes/no, includes use of fiberoptic intubation, change of videolaryngoscope or postpone intervention
During the procedure
Learning curve analysis of intubation rate success
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Improvement of intubation rate success
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Learning curve analysis of time of procedure
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Improvement of time of procedure
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mirco Leo, Physician, Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 18, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ASO.RianGen.22.03

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Difficult Intubation

Clinical Trials on Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope

Subscribe