De-escalating Antiplatelet Therapy to Assess Platelet Reactivity and Outcomes in High Bleeding Risk Patients With Recent ACS (DESC-HBR)

August 22, 2023 updated by: Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "G. Martino"

De-Escalation of Antiplatelet Therapy to Evaluate Platelet Reactivity and Clinical Outcomes After Coronary Stenting in Patients at High Bleeding Risk and Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome: DESC-HBR Trial

High bleeding risk (HBR) patients, comprising up to 50% of those presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), are a high-risk group that is increasing in size due to an aging population. The optimal selection of the potency and duration of antiplatelet therapy to reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic and bleeding events in HBR patients is still a matter of debate. Multiple strategies to reduce bleeding during secondary prevention, such as reducing the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy, using single antiplatelet therapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor, or de-escalating to a lower potency or lower-dose P2Y12 inhibitor, have been proposed. De-escalation to a lower potency or lower-dose P2Y12 inhibitor is particularly attractive because it maintains efficient pharmacological inhibition of multiple platelet pathways while potentially reducing bleeding through less aggressive activity. Yet, there has been no study comparing the effects of different de-escalation strategies with the standard potent P2Y12 inhibitors in HBR patients. The aim of the DESC-HBR study is to assess the impact of de-escalating P2Y12 inhibitor to clopidogrel 75mg, prasugrel 5mg or ticagrelor 60mg bid in HBR patients, in comparison with full-dose potent P2Y12 inhibitors, on the proportion of patients with optimal platelet reactivity (OPR). Secondary objectives involve exploring the effect of de-escalation on clinical events and patients' quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The aim of the DESC-HBR trial is to compare the impact of de-escalating P2Y12 inhibitor to clopidogrel 75mg, prasugrel 5mg or ticagrelor 60mg bid, with full-dose potent P2Y12 inhibitors, on the proportion of patients with optimal platelet reactivity (OPR). The secondary objective is to explore the effect of de-escalating P2Y12 inhibitor therapy on clinical events and patients' quality of life. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients in the OPR range measured through the VerifyNow system at peak level after drug maintenance dose (MD) at 14±2 days. OPR is defined as a platelet reactive unit (PRU) between 85 and 208 reactivity units based on international consensus. A key secondary outcome will be major, minor and nuisance bleeding according to the bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) definition up to 5 months. Secondary pharmacodynamic outcomes include platelet reactivity with the VerifyNow and T-TAS system at different timepoints (baseline, 2h after first dose, through levels before MD and peak levels after MD at 14±2 days). Further pharmacodynamic assessment at 1 and 2 weeks after P2Y12 inhibitor discontinuation will be performed in the subset of patients discontinuing P2Y12 inhibitor at study conclusion or in case of P2Y12 discontinuation at anytime during the study.Other secondary endpoints will be explored including all-cause death, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stroke, net adverse clinical events (NACE), a composite of MACCE and BARC 2-5 bleeding, and each individual endpoint singularly appraised. Quality of life will be evaluated with health mobility and performance scales (i.e. EQ-5D-5L, SF-12), perceived stress scale (i.e. PPS).Cost-effectives analysis will be also carried out by inputting direct and indirect costs in relation to outcomes. Study visits are scheduled at baseline,14±2 days, 3 and 5 months after randomization.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Messina, Italy, 98125
        • Recruiting
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Gaetano Martino
        • Contact:
          • Francesco Costa, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Francesco Costa, MD, PhD
      • Rivoli, Italy, 10098
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Ospedale degli Infermi
        • Contact:
          • Greca Zanda, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Giorgio Quadri, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Greca Zanda, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Participants fulfilling all the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the study:

  • Informed Consent signed and dated.
  • Patients deemed at HBR according to standard definitions (i.e. PRECISE-DAPT ≥25 or HBR-ARC with at least 1 major or 2 minor criteria).
  • Treated with PCI due to a recent ACS (i.e. unstable angina, non-ST segment elevated myocardial infarction or ST segment elevated myocardial infarction) 30 ±7 days earlier.
  • Treated with DAPT with full-dose potent P2Y12 inhibitors (e.g. prasugrel 10mg or ticagrelor 90mg bid) according to international guidelines recommendations.

The presence of anyone of the following exclusion criteria will lead to exclusion of the participant:

  • Age < 18 years
  • Known intolerance, hypersensitivity or contraindication (including active bleeding) to aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor or to any of the excipients
  • Indication to oral anticoagulation
  • Indication to prolonged treatment with full-dose potent P2Y12 inhibitors (e.g. previous stent thrombosis, stenting of last remaining vessel, stent with indication for longer-term DAPT, perceived very high coronary ischemic risk)
  • Any planned major surgery or interventional procedure requiring treatment modification
  • Prior transient ischemic attack, ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke
  • Severe hepatic insufficiency (Child-Pugh class C)
  • Ongoing therapy with strong CYP3A inducers or strong CYP3A inhibitors (e.g. ketoconazole, clarithromycin, nefazodone, ritonavir, atazanavir etc.)
  • Women who are pregnant, breast feeding or of childbearing potential (i.e. fertile, following menarche and who are not surgically sterile, including hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or post-menopausal defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause); Participation in another study with investigational drug within the 30 days, or 5 half-lives of the study drug whichever is longer, preceding and during the present study
  • Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study (language problems, mental disorders, dementia) or comorbidities associated with less than 12 months-life expectation (active malignancies drug or alcohol abuse, etc.) or other conditions that might result in protocol non-compliance.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: CLOPIDOGREL 75 mg qd
50 patients treated with clopidogrel 75mg
Drug: P2Y12 inhibitor de-escalation
Comparing, in patients at High Bleeding Risk (HBR) after a recent Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), continuation of full-dose potent P2Y12 inhibitor with a P2Y12i de-escalation strategy transitioning to clopidogrel 75mg, prasugrel 5mg or ticagrelor 60mg/bid.
Experimental: PRASUGREL 5mg qd
50 patients treated with prasugrel 5mg
Drug: P2Y12 inhibitor de-escalation
Comparing, in patients at High Bleeding Risk (HBR) after a recent Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), continuation of full-dose potent P2Y12 inhibitor with a P2Y12i de-escalation strategy transitioning to clopidogrel 75mg, prasugrel 5mg or ticagrelor 60mg/bid.
Experimental: TICAGRELOR 60mg bid
50 patients treated with ticagrelor 60mg bid
Drug: P2Y12 inhibitor de-escalation
Comparing, in patients at High Bleeding Risk (HBR) after a recent Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), continuation of full-dose potent P2Y12 inhibitor with a P2Y12i de-escalation strategy transitioning to clopidogrel 75mg, prasugrel 5mg or ticagrelor 60mg/bid.
Active Comparator: Continue Potent P2Y12i Full-Dose
50 patients in the full-dose potent P2Y12 inhibitor (prasugrel 10 mg or ticagrelor 90 mg bid according to prior prescription)
Drug: P2Y12 inhibitor de-escalation
Comparing, in patients at High Bleeding Risk (HBR) after a recent Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), continuation of full-dose potent P2Y12 inhibitor with a P2Y12i de-escalation strategy transitioning to clopidogrel 75mg, prasugrel 5mg or ticagrelor 60mg/bid.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Patients Achieving Optimal Platelet Reactivity (OPR) at peak level following Drug Maintenance Dose (MD) Using the VerifyNow System
Time Frame: 2 hours after drug MD at 14±2 days from study inclusion
The incidence of optimal platelet reactivity (OPR) measured by means of the VerifyNow system. OPR will be defined as a PRU between 85 and 208 reactivity units according to international expert consensus.
2 hours after drug MD at 14±2 days from study inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Bleeding Events According to Multiple Bleeding Definitions
Time Frame: 5 Months after enrollment
The incidence of nuisance, minor or major bleeding according to the BARC definition (BARC 1-5).
5 Months after enrollment
Platelet reactive units (PRU) at VerifyNow system
Time Frame: baseline, 2 hours after the first treatment administration and before MD at 14±2 days from study inclusion
Platelet reactive units (PRU) measurement at VerifyNow system
baseline, 2 hours after the first treatment administration and before MD at 14±2 days from study inclusion
Proportion of high platelet reactivity (HPR) and the proportion of low platelet reactivity (LPR) measured through the VerifyNow system
Time Frame: baseline, 2 hours after the first treatment administration, before MD at 14±2 days from study inclusion and at 2 hours after drug MD administration at 14±2 days
The proportion of high platelet reactivity (HPR) defined as PRU > 208, and the proportion of low platelet reactivity (LPR), defined as PRU < 85, measured through the VerifyNow system before first randomized treatment administration (baseline), 2 hours after the first randomized treatment administration, before MD at 14±2 days from study inclusion and at 2 hours after drug MD administration at 14±2 days from study inclusion. PRU at 1 and 2 weeks after P2Y12 inhibitor discontinuation study in patients permanently ceasing treatment.
baseline, 2 hours after the first treatment administration, before MD at 14±2 days from study inclusion and at 2 hours after drug MD administration at 14±2 days
Platelet-derived thrombogenicity at Total Thrombus Formation (T-TAS)
Time Frame: baseline, 2 hours after the first treatment administration, before and after MD at 14±2 days from study inclusion.
Platelet-derived thrombogenicity at Total Thrombus Formation (T-TAS) before first randomized treatment administration (baseline), 2 hours after the first randomized treatment administration, before and after MD at 14±2 days from study inclusion.
baseline, 2 hours after the first treatment administration, before and after MD at 14±2 days from study inclusion.
Adverse clinical event
Time Frame: 14±2 days, 3 and 5 months from study inclusion
Adverse clinical events, assessed at each visit and up to 5 months after randomization. They include: death, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, urgent target vessel revascularization, definite/probable stent thrombosis and net adverse clinical events.
14±2 days, 3 and 5 months from study inclusion
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 5 Months after enrollment
Cost-effectives analysis will be carried out by inputting direct and indirect costs in relation to outcomes assessed.
5 Months after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "G. Martino"

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Gianluca Di Bella
Antonio Micari
Giampiero Vizzari
Giorgio Quadri
Greca Zanda
Ferdinando Varbella

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 12, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 22, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DESC-HBR

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings