Erector Spine Plane (ESP) Block for Analgesia in Pediatric Scoliosis Surgery

July 5, 2023 updated by: Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Postoperative pain after scoliosis correction surgery is severe and usually requires long-term intravenous opioid therapy. Local anesthetic options are limited and include intrathecal opioids and epidural analgesia. However, they are rarely used due to side effects and inconsistent efficacy. The investigators describe an opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia regimen with bilateral erector spinae plane blocks.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis correction is extremely painful and usually requires long-term, high-dose opioid use for adequate perioperative analgesia. Neuromonitoring, i.e., motor-evoked and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs), are the current gold standard for preventing neurological damage. Local anesthesia is essential to multimodal analgesia, but options are limited. Intrathecal or epidural opioid injections of local anesthetics have been reported but are rarely used due to logistical complexity, side effects, and inconsistent analgesic efficacy. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block was first described in 2016 for thoracic neuropathic pain. It is a new interfacial plane technique. Easy to perform on patients without spinal deformities. It was successfully used for surgery in adults. However, even with ultrasound guidance, identifying bone markers in scoliosis patients is challenging. The investigators will treat patients for scoliosis with single-shot bilateral ESP blocks. The investigators aim to provide effective perioperative pain control and achieve intraoperative hemodynamic stability without compromising neuromonitoring.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Poland
    • Wielkopolska
      • Poznań, Wielkopolska, Poland, 61-545
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Spine Diseases and Pediatric Orthopedics, University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients < 18 years old undergoing scoliosis surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refusal to participate
  • > 18 yo
  • Chronic opioid use
  • localized infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: ESB block
Patients will receive preoperative ultrasound-guided bilateral single-injection ESP blocks at one or two levels before incision with 10 mL 0.2% ropivacaine per single injection. Using appropriate sterile precautions, under general anesthesia, an ultrasound (Mindrey TE9) equipped with either a linear 15-6 megahertz (MHz), or a curvilinear 5-2 MHz transducer (habitus-dependent) used to identify the erector spine, transverse process, and paravertebral space. A 22G 0,7x80 mm echogenic block needle (Stimuplex Ultra 360)) is inserted in-plane from the cranial to caudal direction until the needle tip contacts the transverse process. 1-3mL is injected to confirm the proper injection plane by visualizing the spread deep to the erector spinae muscles and superficial to the transverse process. Block is completed with 10mL of 0,2% Ropivacaine. The needle is withdrawn, and the needle entry site is wiped clean.
Drug: Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution
Ultrasound-guided Erector Spine Plane block with 10 mL 0.5% ropivacaine
Experimental: Placebo block
Patients will receive preoperative ultrasound-guided bilateral single-injection ESP blocks at one or two levels before incision with 10 mL 0,9% normal saline per single injection. Using appropriate sterile precautions, under general anesthesia, an ultrasound (Mindrey TE9) equipped with either a linear 15-6 megahertz (MHz), or a curvilinear 5-2 MHz transducer (habitus-dependent) used to identify the erector spine, transverse process, and paravertebral space. A 22G 0,7x80 mm echogenic block needle (Stimuplex Ultra 360)) is inserted in-plane from the cranial to caudal direction until the needle tip contacts the transverse process. 1-3mL is injected to confirm the proper injection plane by visualizing the spread deep to the erector spinae muscles and superficial to the transverse process. Block is completed with 10mL of 0,9% normal saline. The needle is withdrawn, and the needle entry site is wiped clean.
Drug: Normal saline 0.9% Injectable Solution
Ultrasound-guided Erector Spine Plane block with 10 mL 0.9% normal saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain score
Time Frame: Within 30 minutes of emergence from anesthesia
NRS (numerical rating scale) score (0- no pain to 10 worst pain)
Within 30 minutes of emergence from anesthesia
pain score - 60 minutes
Time Frame: Within 60 minutes of emergence from anesthesia
NRS (numerical rating scale) score (0- no pain to 10 worst pain)
Within 60 minutes of emergence from anesthesia
pain score - 90 minutes
Time Frame: Within 90 minutes of emergence from anesthesia
NRS (numerical rating scale) score (0- no pain to 10 worst pain)
Within 90 minutes of emergence from anesthesia
pain score - 120 minutes
Time Frame: Within 120 minutes of emergence from anesthesia
NRS (numerical rating scale) score (0- no pain to 10 worst pain)
Within 120 minutes of emergence from anesthesia
pain score - 6 hours
Time Frame: Within 6 hours of emergence from anesthesia
NRS (numerical rating scale) score (0- no pain to 10 worst pain)
Within 6 hours of emergence from anesthesia
pain score - 12 hours
Time Frame: Within 12 hours of emergence from anesthesia
NRS (numerical rating scale) score (0- no pain to 10 worst pain)
Within 12 hours of emergence from anesthesia
pain score - 24 hours
Time Frame: Within 24 hours of emergence from anesthesia
NRS (numerical rating scale) score (0- no pain to 10 worst pain)
Within 24 hours of emergence from anesthesia
pain score - 48 hours
Time Frame: Within 48 hours of emergence from anesthesia
NRS (numerical rating scale) score (0- no pain to 10 worst pain)
Within 48 hours of emergence from anesthesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
total opioid consumption within first 24 hours
Time Frame: Second day following the procedure
Total morphine milligram equivalents required by patients in the post-anesthesia care unit, prior to discharge from the outpatient surgery center. Following emergence from anesthesia, pain will be assessed in regular intervals, with administration of IV and oral opioids according to numeric rating scale and clinical assessment. Opioid administration stops when patient numerical rating score is <4, when patient endorses manageable pain level, when side effects of opioids are intolerable, or for other concerning clinical conditions as determined by the anesthesiologist of record.
Second day following the procedure
opioid consumption - 48 hours
Time Frame: Within 48 hours of emergence from anesthesia
Total morphine milligram equivalents required by patients in the post-anesthesia care unit, prior to discharge from the outpatient surgery center. Following emergence from anesthesia, pain will be assessed in regular intervals, with administration of IV and oral opioids according to numeric rating scale and clinical assessment. Opioid administration stops when patient numerical rating score is <4, when patient endorses manageable pain level, when side effects of opioids are intolerable, or for other concerning clinical conditions as determined by the anesthesiologist of record.
Within 48 hours of emergence from anesthesia
Nausea and Vomiting
Time Frame: Beginning with emergence from anesthesia and ending with discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit (0-48 hours postoperativly)
This is a yes/no binary outcome measure defined by administration of any antiemetic drug in the post-anesthesia care unit.
Beginning with emergence from anesthesia and ending with discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit (0-48 hours postoperativly)
NLR -12 hours
Time Frame: 12 hours postoperatively
neutrophil/limphocyte ratio
12 hours postoperatively
PLR -12 hours
Time Frame: 12 hours postoperatively
platelet/limphocyte ratio
12 hours postoperatively
NLR - 24 hours
Time Frame: 12 hours postoperatively
neutrophil/limphocyte ratio
12 hours postoperatively
PLR - 24 hours
Time Frame: 12 hours postoperatively
platelet/limphocyte ratio
12 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Małgorzata Domagalska, PhD, Department of Palliative Medicine, University of Medical Sciences
  • Study Chair: Tomasz Kotwicki, Profesor, Department of Spine Diseases and Pediatric Orthopedics, University of Medical Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 8, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 30, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 5, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 673/22

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available after completing the study- December 2024

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings