Improving HIV Care Engagement Among Ugandan Adolescent Girls and Young Women: The Kisoboka Mukwano Intervention

December 23, 2025 updated by: Ijeoma Ogbonnaya, Arizona State University

Improving HIV Care Engagement Among Ugandan Adolescent Girls and Young Women Through Reductions in Male Partner Alcohol Use and Intimate Partner Violence Risk: The Kisoboka Mukwano Intervention

This study will develop and pilot test a couples-based intervention to help adolescent girls and young women living with HIV (WLHIV (15-24 years) living in Uganda access HIV care and improve the outcomes of their HIV treatment by targeting male partner alcohol use to reduce IPV risk.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In Uganda, adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) are disproportionately affected by HIV and have poor viral suppression rates, increasing their risk of onward transmission. Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major barrier to mitigating the impact of HIV among AGYW. AGYW living with HIV (AGYWLHIV) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) who have experienced IPV have worse medication adherence, viral suppression, and care engagement than those without IPV. Further, male partner alcohol use directly and indirectly increases IPV risk among AGYW in SSA. Thus, an intervention with components that address heavy alcohol use among male partners could decrease AGYW's IPV risk, especially in Uganda, which has the highest alcohol use per capita in SSA. Couples- based interventions have effectively reduced male partner alcohol use, relationship conflict IPV, and improved viral suppression and HIV care engagement; yet, none have been tailored to AGYWLHIV in SSA. The investigators propose to develop and pilot a couples-based intervention that focuses on improving HIV care engagement and ART adherence among AGYWLHIV by reducing heavy alcohol use among male partners and couple IPV risk. Additionally, the investigators will explore the intervention's effects on AGYW viral load for the additional key benefit of treatment as prevention. The study aims are to: 1) Adapt the behavioral components of a brief Motivational Interviewing (MI)-based alcohol intervention to create the proposed Kisoboka Mukwano ("It is possible, my love!") intervention. The intervention will promote strategies for reductions in male partner alcohol use, coping with relationship conflict and stress, changing norms that reduce IPV and support engagement in HIV care and ART adherence among AGYWLHIV, and, thereby, enhance future sustained viral suppression and benefits of treatment as prevention. The intervention will be adapted and tailored to be delivered with heterosexual couples, involve peer navigators, address IPV, and be developmentally appropriate for AGYWLHIV in Uganda. The investigators will develop and refine the intervention in collaboration with an intervention steering committee through: qualitative research with married/cohabiting AGYWLHIV, married/cohabiting men, and key informants and an initial pilot test with 6 couples. 2) The investigators will assess safety, acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary estimates of the potential for the intervention, as compared to the control group, to improve HIV, alcohol, and IPV outcomes. The investigators will examine preliminary effects on AGYW HIV care engagement, AGYW ART adherence, heavy alcohol use among male partners, and couple IPV risk and explore effects on AGYW viral load as well as intermediate outcomes related to intervention components. The investigators will assess these outcomes at baseline and then at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Study findings will be used to guide a subsequent R01 proposal to test the intervention in a larger clinical trial.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
80

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Uganda
      • Kampala, Uganda
        • Makerere Univerisity School of Public Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW)/Female:

  • aged 18-24 or self-reported as emancipated minors aged 15-17,
  • HIV+
  • meets one or more of the following non-engagement criteria: not currently enrolled in an HIV clinic (e.g., never enrolled, dropped out); not currently taking ART; missed 1 or more scheduled HIV care appointments requiring physical presence (e.g., viral load [VL] testing) in the last 12 months; < 90% ART adherence in the last 2 weeks; most recent VL>1000 or expected recent VL test results absent in clinic records despite initiating ART >6 months ago
  • self-report a history of at least one incident of IPV (physical, sexual, and/or emotional) and/or controlling behavior ever perpetrated by their current male partner
  • agree to let research staff contact their male partner.

Male Partners of AGYW/Male:

  • aged 18+ years or emancipated minors
  • report consuming ≥ 6 drinks per occasion at least once or more in the prior 30 days or scores 4 or more on the AUDIT (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test)-C

Couples (each partner (male and female) must independently report):

  • married or living together as if married for ≥6 months
  • planning to stay together for at least another 2 months (intervention period)
  • lived in the Wakiso District area ≥3 months
  • not planning to move from the area within the next 6 months
  • respond similarly (not exact but close) to questions on the study-developed Couple Verification Screening

Exclusion Criteria

AGYW (female):

  • reporting any severe physical IPV experienced in prior 3 months.

Couples (male and female):

  • do not speak Luganda or English
  • do not feel they cannot safely participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Kisoboka Mukwano Intervention (treatment)
A brief couples-based intervention using motivational interviewing, peer navigation, and behavioral economic approaches to target intimate partner violence, alcohol use, and HIV care engagement.
Behavioral: Kisoboka Mukwano ("It is possible, my love!") Intervention
The intervention consists of 5 bi-weekly sessions each lasting 60 to 90 minutes. It uses motivational interviewing, peer navigation, and behavioral economics to promote strategies for economic strengthening, reductions in male partner alcohol use, coping with relationship conflict and stress, changing norms that reduce intimate partner violence and support engagement in HIV care and antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence among adolescent girls and young women living with HIV, and, thereby, enhances future sustained viral suppression and benefits of treatment as prevention.
Active Comparator: Screening & Referral (control)
Brief feedback on intimate partner violence and alcohol use (males), referrals for these conditions, and briefly discuss the importance of HIV care engagement and adherence.
Behavioral: Screening and Referral
Intimate partner violence screening, alcohol screening, and referral

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change from baseline in antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence biomarker (females and HIV+ male partners)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 month follow up
presence of Tenofoivir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) detected in urine
3 and 6 month follow up
change from baseline in self-reported antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence (females and HIV+ male partners)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 month follow up
Self- report of missed ART using the AIDS Clinical Trials Group Adherence (AACTG) measures
3 and 6 month follow up
change from baseline in HIV care engagement (females and HIV+ male partners)
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
HIV clinic visit adherence
3 months, 6 months
change from baseline in phosphatidylethanol (PEth) (male partners)
Time Frame: 6 months
alcohol biomarker (PEth) levels
6 months
change from baseline in heavy drinking (male partners)
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
assessed with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C)
3 months, 6 months
Intimate partner violence (IPV) occurence (males and females)
Time Frame: 6 months
Any incident of IPV perpetration and victimization: physical, sexual, verbal/emotional, intimidation and/or controlling behavior measured using the World Health Organization (WHO) Instrument/ Demographic and Health Data (DHS) Domestic Violence Modules.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fear of intimate partner violence (males and females)
Time Frame: 6 month follow up
Rating of how often one is afraid of their current spouse/partner measured using the WHO Instrument/ DHS Domestic Violence Modules.
6 month follow up

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change from baseline in HIV viral load (females and HIV+ males)
Time Frame: 6 months
(1) Biomarker testing using blood (females) and (2) clinic records (males).
6 months
change from baseline in PrEP adherence (male partners taking PrEP)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 month follow up
self- report of missed PrEP using an adapted version of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group Adherence (AACTG) measures
3 and 6 month follow up
PrEP uptake
Time Frame: through 6 month follow-up
Initiation of PrEP
through 6 month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Arizona State University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
San Diego State University
University of California, San Diego
Makerere University
Reach the Youth Uganda

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Susan M Kiene, PhD, San Diego State University
  • Principal Investigator: Ijeoma Nwabuzor Ogbonnaya, PhD, Arizona State University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 17, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 23, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R34AA030489 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All collected individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the 6-month clinical trial, excluding qualitative data and data collected for formative research.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Two years after the grant end date specified on the first Notice of Award (08-31-2025). Any subject-level data and the associated analyzed data used in a journal publication will be shared at the time of publication, even if the publication occurs before the two-year automatic share date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to data for research purposes will be provided through the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive (NDA) Data Access Committee (DAC). Investigators and institutions seeking data from NDA will be expected to meet data security measures and will be asked to submit a Data Use Certification, which is cosigned by the investigator and the designated Institutional Official(s) at the NIH-recognized sponsoring institution with a current Federal Wide Assurance (FWA).

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings