Clinical Trial Comparing Devices Used for Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation

September 2, 2025 updated by: Inova Health Care Services

A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Rectilinear Biphasic Waveform and Biphasic Truncated Exponential Waveform Shocks for Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation (Zoll vs Lifepak)

The goal of this single center, investigator initiated, open label prospective randomized controlled trial is to compare the efficacy of a single 200J RBW shock and a single 360J BTE shock. The secondary objective of the study is to compare the frequency of adverse events after one or two 200J RBW or 360J BTE shocks

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Data will be derived from approximately 560 patients arriving to Inova sites of care in Atrial Fibrillation (AF) scheduled to undergo either Atrial Fibrillation ablation with expected Direct Current Cardioversion (DCCV) or elective stand-alone AF DCCV. Patients will be included if they are in AF prior to their procedure and are willing to sign the information sheet and comply with the research procedures. Participants will be excluded if they are in a rhythm other than AF on arrival, have not been appropriately anticoagulated with warfarin or direct oral anticoagulant, or have known left atrial appendage thrombus prior to their procedure.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
546

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Virginia
      • Falls Church, Virginia, United States, 22042
        • Inova Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. In AF on presentation with plan for DCCV in either the Electrophysiology lab or DCCV procedure area

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants who are receiving any other investigational agents.
  2. Parents/guardians or participants who, in the opinion of the Investigator, may be non-compliant with study schedules or procedures.
  3. Patients with arrhythmias other than AF
  4. Patients with hemodynamically unstable AF
  5. Patients with untreated hyperthyroidism
  6. Patients with known or suspected pregnancy
  7. Patients without sufficient anticoagulation or a transesophageal echocardiogram or computed tomography scan documenting the absence of intracardiac thrombi

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Output synchronized to 200J using Zoll Rectilinear Biphasic Waveform (RBW) defibrillator
Participants receiving Direct Current Cardioversion (DCCV) using full output Rectilinear Biphasic Waveform (RBW) shocks from a Zoll defibrillator (200 Joules) up to 2 shocks.
Device: Zoll external defibrillator
Patients with AF will be randomized to receive a full output synchronized 200J shock using a RBW waveform from a Zoll defibrillator
Active Comparator: Output synchronized to 360J Lifepak Biphasic Truncated Exponential Waveform (BTE) defibrillator
Participants receiving Direct Current Cardioversion (DCCV) using full output Biphasic Truncated Exponential Waveform (BTE) shocks from a Physiocontrol/Medtronic Lifepak defibrillator (360 Joules) up to 2 shocks.
Device: Lifepak external defibrillator
Patients with AF will be randomized to receive a full output synchronized 360J shock using a BTE waveform from a Lifepak defibrillator
Active Comparator: Zoll defibrillator waveform used after unsuccessful second full output shock.
Participants who received first shock via Zoll that do not have success after a second full output shock will be crossed over to the Lifepak defibrillator waveform and receive up to 2 full output shocks with a minimum of 1 minute between each shock to ascertain the outcome of the immediately prior shock.
Device: Lifepak external defibrillator
Patients with AF will be randomized to receive a full output synchronized 360J shock using a BTE waveform from a Lifepak defibrillator
Active Comparator: Lifepak defibrillator waveform used after unsuccessful second full output shock.
Participants who received first shock via Lifepak that do not have success after a second full output shock will be crossed over to the Zoll defibrillator waveform and receive up to 2 full output shocks with a minimum of 1 minute between each shock to ascertain the outcome of the immediately prior shock.
Device: Zoll external defibrillator
Patients with AF will be randomized to receive a full output synchronized 200J shock using a RBW waveform from a Zoll defibrillator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Number of Participants in Normal Sinus Rhythm (NSR) by ECG After the First DCCV Shock
Time Frame: At least 1 minute after shock delivery
The frequency of NSR by ECG one minute after a single full output DCCV shock is delivered by either a 200J RBW waveform shock from a Zoll Series R defibrillator or 360J BTE waveform shock from a Lifepak 15 defibrillator
At least 1 minute after shock delivery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Number of Participants in Normal Sinus Rhythm (NSR) by ECG After the First or Second DCCV Shock
Time Frame: At least 1 minute after shock delivery
The frequency of NSR by ECG one minute after a first or second full output DCCV shock is delivered using either a 200J RBW waveform shock from a Zoll Series R defibrillator or 360J BTE waveform shock from a Lifepak 15 defibrillator
At least 1 minute after shock delivery
The Frequency of NSR One Minute After the First or Second Full Output DCCV Shock is Delivered by a Zoll Series R RBW Waveform Defibrillator and a Lifepak Series 15/20 BTE Waveform Defibrillator After Crossing Over From the Alternative Defibrillator.
Time Frame: At least 1 minute after shock delivery
The frequency of NSR one minute after the first or second full output DCCV shock is delivered by a Zoll Series R RBW waveform defibrillator and a Lifepak Series 15/20 BTE waveform defibrillator after crossing over from the alternative defibrillator.
At least 1 minute after shock delivery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Inova Health Care Services

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Brett Atwater, MD, Inova Health Care Services

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 21, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 14, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 11, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 2, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • U23-04-5042

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings